Scanned sites / www.advocateslaw.com

SEO report for www.advocateslaw.com DR 32

The latest Site Spider scan of www.advocateslaw.com, with 356 scans on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/www-advocateslaw-com/2026-10-29-1134.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-10-29 11:34:01 UTC, finished 2026-10-29 16:35:41 UTC. Found with openstreetmap overpass

Site: https://www.advocateslaw.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

82/ 100Good

On October 29, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 568 pages and 335 assets of www.advocateslaw.com, starting from https://www.advocateslaw.com/. It scored 82 out of 100, a good result. 11 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (10), meta descriptions (302), title tags (200); 9 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), meta descriptions (−4.8), title tags (−4). 13 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium5 medium and 2 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
568
Assets fetched
335
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
11 of 33
CoverageComplete crawl

903 of 903 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 300 link destinations on other sites were checked, 313 left unchecked.

  • Title tags200 issues
    200 of 430 pages have title issues. 71 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4 points
  • Meta descriptions302 issues
    302 of 430 pages have meta description issues. 71 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.8 points
  • Headings3 issues
    3 of 430 pages have heading issues. 71 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Broken links7 issues
    77 internal links point at 7 broken URLs.
    −0.3 points
  • Links to other sites3 issues
    3 destinations answered with an error, 58 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 313 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
    −0.2 points
  • Redirects61 issues
    64 redirecting URLs, 18 of them chained.
    −0.5 points
  • Non-200 responses8 issues
    73 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 67 of them are pages, 8 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.2 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability44 issues
    44 of 450 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 51 pages noindex by design.
    −0.9 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 2382 image references have no alt attribute. 636 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets10 issues
    10 assets larger than 500 KB among 335 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage107 issues
    10 sitemaps listing 340 URLs: 98 crawled pages missing, 8 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 1 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −1.3 points
  • Internal link counts102 noted
    Internal link counts for 500 pages; 102 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 430 pages have fewer than 200 words. 71 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate content8 issues
    1 group of pages with identical HTML.
    −0.1 points
  • URL format18 noted
    18 of 568 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals71 noted
    71 of 501 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives495 noted
    495 pages carry a robots directive; 6 carry none.
  • Anchor text90 noted
    90 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure157 noted
    157 of 430 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 71 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length117 noted
    90 images over 100 KB; 27 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies1 noted
    1 URL answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationOK
    All 501 pages keep their head tags in <head>, once each, under Googlebot's 2 MB.
  • hreflangOK
    No page declares hreflang.
  • Structured data19 noted
    499 of 430 indexable pages carry structured data: WebSite (498), BreadcrumbList (497), ListItem (497), https://www.schema.org/SiteNavigationElement (496), LegalService (307). 19 pages with errors a rich result would fail on.
  • Near duplicates46 noted
    46 pages in 23 groups read almost the same as another page (95% alike or more).
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 501 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positions67 noted
    67 of 430 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
  • Pagination21 noted
    229 pages in pagination sequences; 21 with problems.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    2 cookies set by the site; 13 response headers recorded across 903 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 501 pages; 308 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • Spelling91 noted
    91 words an English dictionary does not know, on 222 pages. Product names and jargon will appear here too.

What changed since the last scan

Score unchanged

www.advocateslaw.com scored 82 out of 100 in both of its last two scans. That is a steady score, not an unchanged site: 48 findings changed between the two scans. Across 100 scans on record the score has ended up where it started, at 82.

  • Pages: 1 new
  • Broken links: 1 gone
  • Page status codes: 1 changed
  • Internal links to the page: 45 changed
  1. 2026-10-28 03:10:03 UTC82/100568 pages
  2. 2026-10-28 06:14:16 UTC82/100568 pages
  3. 2026-10-28 10:09:25 UTC82/100568 pages
  4. 2026-10-28 21:10:07 UTC82/100568 pages
  5. 2026-10-29 03:33:24 UTC82/100568 pages
  6. 2026-10-29 08:32:08 UTC82/100568 pages
  7. 2026-10-29 09:27:50 UTC82/100568 pages
  8. 2026-10-29 09:35:26 UTC82/100568 pages
  9. 2026-10-29 11:32:50 UTC82/100568 pages
  10. 2026-10-29 11:34:01 UTC82/100568 pages

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2343 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.advocateslaw.com scores 82%, higher than 59% of the 2343 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0591170%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 4 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 69 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 70 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 107 sites79%: 84 sites80%: 108 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 117 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 108 sites85%: 88 sites86%: 70 sites87%: 73 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 65 sites90%: 36 sites91%: 46 sites92%: 39 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 12 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 5 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 68 sites82% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

The site has several technical issues impacting SEO, primarily broken links, redirects, and issues with title tags and meta descriptions. Addressing these will enhance user experience and improve rankings.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: 77 internal broken links can harm user experience and SEO.

    How: Identify and update or remove broken links on affected pages.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Redirect Chains

    Why: 64 redirecting URLs with 18 chained redirects can slow down site performance.

    How: Simplify redirects to allow direct access to final URLs, minimizing hops.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Address Title Tag Issues

    Why: 200 pages with title issues can confuse search engines and affect rankings.

    How: Review and optimize title tags for relevance and length for all affected pages.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: 302 pages missing or with issues in meta descriptions fail to attract clicks.

    How: Write and optimize unique meta descriptions for all affected pages.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Fix Heading Issues

    Why: 3 pages with multiple H1s can mislead search engines about page structure.

    How: Standardize page headings to ensure a single H1 per page.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Shrink Heavy Assets

    Why: 10 heavy assets can slow page loading times, affecting user experience.

    How: Compress or optimize assets over 500 KB for better performance.

    Checks: heavy-assets

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website has several significant security issues, including missing security headers and using an outdated JavaScript library. Implementing recommended headers and updating libraries will enhance protection against various attacks. Address these findings promptly to safeguard user data.

  • 0 high
  • 5 medium
  • 2 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users can be intercepted when navigating to the site via HTTP.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Lack of CSP allows potentially harmful scripts to run from any source.

    Fix: Implement CSP header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-OptionsMedium

    Why it matters: Absence of this header allows clickjacking by allowing the site to be framed elsewhere.

    Fix: Add header: X-Frame-Options: DENY

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Cookies Lack Protective FlagsMedium

    Why it matters: Cookies missing Secure, HttpOnly, and SameSite flags are vulnerable to attacks.

    Fix: Set cookie flags: Secure; HttpOnly; SameSite=Lax

    Evidence: Cookie flags

  5. 5

    Outdated jQuery LibraryMedium

    Why it matters: Using jQuery 3.2.1 exposes the site to known vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Update jQuery to at least version 3.5.0 to fix identified vulnerabilities.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  6. 6

    Missing X-Content-Type-OptionsLow

    Why it matters: Without this option, browsers may misinterpret files, leading to potential attacks.

    Fix: Set header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  7. 7

    Missing Referrer PolicyLow

    Why it matters: In the absence of this policy, sensitive URL information may be leaked.

    Fix: Add header: Referrer-Policy: no-referrer

    Evidence: Referrer policy

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/seattle/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 501 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/seattle/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/seattle/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/seattle/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/seattle/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/seattle/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no permissions-policy
  • FoundCookie flagsMedium

    702 of 704 cookies are missing protective flags. Without HttpOnly a script can read the cookie; without Secure it travels over plain HTTP; without SameSite it is sent on cross-site requests.

    • 29 Oct 2026 12:04:02 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 29 Oct 2026 15:21:25 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/sitemap.xml) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 29 Oct 2026 12:04:21 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/seattle/) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 29 Oct 2026 12:05:04 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 29 Oct 2026 12:05:09 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 29 Oct 2026 12:05:26 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 29 Oct 2026 12:06:04 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 29 Oct 2026 12:06:10 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 29 Oct 2026 12:06:27 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 29 Oct 2026 12:07:07 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 29 Oct 2026 12:07:13 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 29 Oct 2026 12:07:29 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 3.2.1. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 3.2.1 in https://www.advocateslaw.com/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/js/placeholders.jq…: CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • NoteSoftware version disclosure

    Responses name the framework in an X-Powered-By header but hide the version.

    • server: cloudflare (903 responses)
    • x-powered-by: WP Engine (563 responses)
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • widget.reviewability.com (3 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 8 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
5 checks passed
  • OKHTTPS

    All 501 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    79 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of www.advocateslaw.com

Sites scoring near www.advocateslaw.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.advocateslaw.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.advocateslaw.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.advocateslaw.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.