Scanned sites / veprof.com

SEO report for veprof.com DR 32

The latest Site Spider scan of veprof.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/veprof-com/2026-09-08-2359.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-08 23:59:24 UTC, finished 2026-09-09 00:02:38 UTC

Site: https://veprof.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

83/ 100Good

On September 8, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 96 pages and 392 assets of veprof.com, starting from https://veprof.com/. It scored 83 out of 100, a good result. 7 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (82), title tags (59), heavy assets (3); 11 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−6.9), title tags (−6.2), heavy assets (−1.8). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium, 1 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
96
Assets fetched
392
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
7 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

488 of 488 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 10 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags59 issues
    59 of 93 pages have title issues. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −6.2 points
  • Meta descriptions82 issues
    82 of 93 pages have meta description issues. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −6.9 points
  • Headings23 issues
    23 of 93 pages have heading issues. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1.5 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites190 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 4 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 10 destinations checked.
  • Redirects4 noted
    4 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responses4 noted
    4 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 1 of them is a page, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 95 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 1566 image references have no alt attribute. 1295 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets3 issues
    3 assets larger than 500 KB among 392 fetched assets.
    −1.8 points
  • Orphan pages1 issue
    1 page have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage10 issues
    1 sitemap listing 84 URLs: 9 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 1 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.6 points
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 95 pages; none is a dead end or buried.
  • Thin content5 issues
    5 of 93 pages have fewer than 200 words. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.4 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format11 noted
    11 of 96 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals2 noted
    2 of 95 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directivesOK
    No page carries a robots directive; all 95 pages are open to search engines.
  • Anchor text78 noted
    78 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure77 noted
    77 of 93 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length15 noted
    15 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 95 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 10 response headers recorded across 488 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 95 pages; 51 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 76 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2314 sites, median 79%, average 78%

veprof.com scores 83%, higher than 65% of the 2314 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581160%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 8 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 36 sites67%: 34 sites68%: 35 sites69%: 46 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 68 sites72%: 70 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 70 sites75%: 70 sites76%: 86 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 107 sites79%: 85 sites80%: 106 sites81%: 104 sites82%: 116 sites83%: 98 sites84%: 107 sites85%: 86 sites86%: 70 sites87%: 73 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 60 sites90%: 34 sites91%: 44 sites92%: 37 sites93%: 23 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 11 sites96%: 9 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 1 site100%: 70 sites83% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site's health score is good, but improvements are necessary for better SEO performance. Focus on fixing redirects, titles, and adding meta descriptions.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Redirects may hinder crawling efficiency and affect SEO.

    How: Update URLs to direct users straight to the final destination without redirection.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: Non-200 responses can lead to inaccessible content, negatively impacting user experience.

    How: Identify and fix these URLs to return a 200 status.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Improve Title Tags

    Why: 59 pages have title issues, impacting click-through rate and relevance.

    How: Ensure each title is unique, descriptive, and at least 30 characters long.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Update Meta Descriptions

    Why: 79 pages lack effective meta descriptions, crucial for search visibility.

    How: Write concise and engaging descriptions under 160 characters for affected pages.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Add Headings (H1 Tags)

    Why: Missing H1 tags hinder content structure and SEO.

    How: Insert a unique H1 tag for pages lacking one, summarizing the content accurately.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Address Thin Content

    Why: Pages with fewer than 200 words may rank poorly.

    How: Expand content on thin pages to provide more value and context.

    Checks: thin-content

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website veprof.com lacks critical security headers and relies on a vulnerable version of jQuery. This increases risks of interception, script injection, and data exposure. Immediate remediation is advised to enhance security.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 1 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, visitors typing the site URL without HTTPS can be intercepted on initial requests.

    Fix: Implement the HSTS header by adding 'Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains' to your server configuration.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Lack of a CSP allows untrusted content to be loaded, increasing risks of XSS attacks.

    Fix: Add a CSP header, such as 'Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' www.googletagmanager.com;' to enhance security.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Vulnerable JavaScript LibraryMedium

    Why it matters: Using jQuery 1.12.4 exposes the site to known vulnerabilities that could be exploited.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to version 3.5.0 or higher to address known vulnerabilities.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  4. 4

    Third-party Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from other domains can change what runs on your site if compromised.

    Fix: Consider implementing Subresource Integrity (SRI) for scripts or defining them in your CSP to mitigate risks.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  5. 5

    Sensitive Paths Listed in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The 'Disallow' directive in robots.txt can indicate sensitive paths that are public and may require access control.

    Fix: Review the contents of robots.txt and restrict access to sensitive directories via server configuration.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.veprof.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.veprof.com/services → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.veprof.com/portfolio → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.veprof.com/blog → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.veprof.com/contact-us-form → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.veprof.com/careers → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.veprof.com/about-veprof → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.veprof.com/career-c-dev → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.veprof.com/career-fullstack → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.veprof.com/career-sales-manager → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.veprof.com/gstreamer-software-development → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.veprof.com/macos-software-development → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 95 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://www.veprof.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.veprof.com/services → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.veprof.com/portfolio → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.veprof.com/blog → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.veprof.com/contact-us-form → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.veprof.com/careers → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.veprof.com/about-veprof → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.veprof.com/career-c-dev → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.veprof.com/career-fullstack → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.veprof.com/career-sales-manager → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.veprof.com/gstreamer-software-development → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.veprof.com/macos-software-development → no content-security-policy
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 1.12.4. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 1.12.4 in https://www.veprof.com/media/jui/js/jquery.min.js: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /includes/
8 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 95 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 95 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 95 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    16 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of veprof.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near veprof.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling veprof.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own veprof.com?