Scanned sites / www.advocateslaw.com / 2026-10-20-1413

www.advocateslaw.com scan from 2026-10-20 14:13:52 UTC DR 32

A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.advocateslaw.com.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-10-20-1413

Scanned 2026-10-20 14:13:52 UTC, finished 2026-10-20 18:46:07 UTC. Found with openstreetmap overpass

Site: https://www.advocateslaw.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

81/ 100Good

On October 20, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 520 pages and 335 assets of www.advocateslaw.com, starting from https://www.advocateslaw.com/. It scored 81 out of 100, a good result. 12 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (11), meta descriptions (274), title tags (185); 8 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), meta descriptions (−4.7), title tags (−3.9). 13 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium4 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
520
Assets fetched
335
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
12 of 33
CoverageComplete crawl

855 of 855 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 300 link destinations on other sites were checked, 289 left unchecked.

  • Title tags185 issues
    185 of 397 pages have title issues. 72 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.9 points
  • Meta descriptions274 issues
    274 of 397 pages have meta description issues. 72 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.7 points
  • Headings4 issues
    4 of 397 pages have heading issues. 72 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.1 points
  • Broken links7 issues
    77 internal links point at 7 broken URLs.
    −0.3 points
  • Links to other sites2 issues
    2 destinations answered with an error, 65 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 289 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
    −0.2 points
  • Redirects45 issues
    48 redirecting URLs, 19 of them chained.
    −0.4 points
  • Non-200 responses8 issues
    57 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 51 of them are pages, 8 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.2 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability45 issues
    45 of 418 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 51 pages noindex by design.
    −1 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 2370 image references have no alt attribute. 774 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets11 issues
    11 assets larger than 500 KB among 335 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages8 issues
    8 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.1 points
  • Sitemap coverage129 issues
    9 sitemaps listing 284 URLs: 117 crawled pages missing, 3 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 9 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −1.7 points
  • Internal link counts108 noted
    Internal link counts for 469 pages; 108 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 397 pages have fewer than 200 words. 72 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate content8 issues
    1 group of pages with identical HTML.
    −0.1 points
  • URL format15 noted
    15 of 520 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals72 noted
    72 of 469 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives458 noted
    458 pages carry a robots directive; 11 carry none.
  • Anchor text93 noted
    93 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure183 noted
    183 of 397 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 72 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length118 noted
    91 images over 100 KB; 27 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies1 noted
    1 URL answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationOK
    All 469 pages keep their head tags in <head>, once each, under Googlebot's 2 MB.
  • hreflangOK
    No page declares hreflang.
  • Structured data19 noted
    467 of 397 indexable pages carry structured data: WebSite (466), BreadcrumbList (465), ListItem (465), https://www.schema.org/SiteNavigationElement (464), LegalService (309). 19 pages with errors a rich result would fail on.
  • Near duplicates74 noted
    74 pages in 37 groups read almost the same as another page (95% alike or more).
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 469 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positions70 noted
    70 of 389 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
  • Pagination23 noted
    234 pages in pagination sequences; 23 with problems.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    1 cookie set by the site; 13 response headers recorded across 855 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 469 pages; 263 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • Spelling85 noted
    85 words an English dictionary does not know, on 225 pages. Product names and jargon will appear here too.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2298 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.advocateslaw.com scores 81%, higher than 55% of the 2298 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581150%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 0 sites10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 16 sites59%: 7 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 36 sites67%: 34 sites68%: 35 sites69%: 46 sites70%: 43 sites71%: 68 sites72%: 70 sites73%: 67 sites74%: 71 sites75%: 71 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 91 sites78%: 105 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 106 sites81%: 108 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 95 sites84%: 107 sites85%: 83 sites86%: 70 sites87%: 72 sites88%: 61 sites89%: 60 sites90%: 33 sites91%: 45 sites92%: 36 sites93%: 21 sites94%: 15 sites95%: 10 sites96%: 9 sites97%: 10 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 0 sites100%: 70 sites81% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

The site has several technical issues impacting SEO, primarily broken links, redirects, and missing meta descriptions. Addressing these will enhance user experience and search visibility.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Improving broken links enhances user experience and helps maintain site authority.

    How: Identify the 77 internal links pointing at broken URLs and update or remove them.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Optimize Redirects

    Why: Reducing chained redirects improves page load times and user experience.

    How: Shorten the 48 redirecting URLs to direct to final destinations with no chains.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Fix Non-200 Responses

    Why: Resolving non-200 responses ensures all users can access content without errors.

    How: Address the 51 URLs that do not return a 2xx response for better accessibility.

    Checks: status-codes

  4. 4

    Add Missing Meta Descriptions

    Why: Providing unique meta descriptions increases click-through rates from search results.

    How: Write meta descriptions for the 122 pages currently lacking them.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Fix Title Tag Issues

    Why: Optimizing title tags increases relevancy in search results.

    How: Revise the 185 title tags that have issues, ensuring they are unique and within recommended lengths.

    Checks: titles

  6. 6

    Fix Heading Issues

    Why: Proper heading structure enhances readability and SEO.

    How: Correct heading issues on the 4 pages having multiple H1s to ensure valid structure.

    Checks: headings

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website has key security vulnerabilities, including missing HTTP Headers that protect against various attacks. It's crucial to implement these measures to enhance user safety and privacy. Prioritize fixing these issues promptly.

  • 0 high
  • 4 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, visitors using HTTP can be intercepted on their first request.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Lack of CSP allows unrestricted loading of scripts and resources, increasing XSS risk.

    Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; script-src 'self';

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options (Clickjacking Protection)Medium

    Why it matters: Without X-Frame-Options, your site can be embedded in invisible frames on other sites.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Vulnerable JavaScript Library (jQuery)Medium

    Why it matters: jQuery version 3.1.3 has known vulnerabilities that may be exploitable depending on usage.

    Fix: Upgrade to jQuery version 3.5.0 or later.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  5. 5

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options (MIME Sniffing Protection)Low

    Why it matters: Absence of this header allows browsers to misinterpret file types, posing a risk.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  6. 6

    Missing Referrer PolicyLow

    Why it matters: Without a referrer policy, full URLs including query strings leak when users navigate.

    Fix: Add the header: Referrer-Policy: no-referrer

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  7. 7

    Missing Permissions PolicyInfo

    Why it matters: This policy limits browser features that could be exploited if scripts are injected.

    Fix: Add the header: Permissions-Policy: geolocation=(), microphone=(), camera=()

    Evidence: Permissions policy

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 469 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no permissions-policy
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 3.1.3. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 3.1.3 in https://www.advocateslaw.com/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/js/placeholders.jq…: CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • NoteSoftware version disclosure

    Responses name the framework in an X-Powered-By header but hide the version.

    • server: cloudflare (855 responses)
    • x-powered-by: WP Engine (512 responses)
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • widget.reviewability.com (3 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 8 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
6 checks passed
  • OKHTTPS

    All 469 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKCookie flags

    All 1 cookie carry Secure, HttpOnly and SameSite flags.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    79 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.advocateslaw.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.advocateslaw.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.advocateslaw.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.advocateslaw.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.