Scanned sites / www.advocateslaw.com / 2026-10-25-1004

www.advocateslaw.com scan from 2026-10-25 10:04:23 UTC DR 32

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-10-25-1004

Scanned 2026-10-25 10:04:23 UTC, finished 2026-10-25 13:43:46 UTC. Found with openstreetmap overpass

Site: https://www.advocateslaw.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

82/ 100Good

On October 25, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 562 pages and 336 assets of www.advocateslaw.com, starting from https://www.advocateslaw.com/. It scored 82 out of 100, a good result. 11 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (10), meta descriptions (292), title tags (190); 9 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), meta descriptions (−4.8), title tags (−3.9). 13 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium4 medium and 2 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
562
Assets fetched
336
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
11 of 33
CoverageComplete crawl

898 of 898 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 300 link destinations on other sites were checked, 289 left unchecked.

  • Title tags190 issues
    190 of 420 pages have title issues. 71 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.9 points
  • Meta descriptions292 issues
    292 of 420 pages have meta description issues. 71 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.8 points
  • Headings5 issues
    5 of 420 pages have heading issues. 71 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.1 points
  • Broken links7 issues
    77 internal links point at 7 broken URLs.
    −0.3 points
  • Links to other sites3 issues
    3 destinations answered with an error, 66 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 289 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
    −0.2 points
  • Redirects66 issues
    68 redirecting URLs, 22 of them chained.
    −0.5 points
  • Non-200 responses8 issues
    77 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 71 of them are pages, 8 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.2 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability44 issues
    44 of 440 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 51 pages noindex by design.
    −0.9 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 2341 image references have no alt attribute. 636 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets10 issues
    10 assets larger than 500 KB among 336 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage107 issues
    10 sitemaps listing 330 URLs: 98 crawled pages missing, 8 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 1 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −1.3 points
  • Internal link counts102 noted
    Internal link counts for 491 pages; 102 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 420 pages have fewer than 200 words. 71 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate content8 issues
    1 group of pages with identical HTML.
    −0.1 points
  • URL format17 noted
    17 of 562 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals71 noted
    71 of 491 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives485 noted
    485 pages carry a robots directive; 6 carry none.
  • Anchor text90 noted
    90 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure158 noted
    158 of 420 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 71 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length117 noted
    90 images over 100 KB; 27 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies1 noted
    1 URL answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationOK
    All 491 pages keep their head tags in <head>, once each, under Googlebot's 2 MB.
  • hreflangOK
    No page declares hreflang.
  • Structured data19 noted
    489 of 420 indexable pages carry structured data: WebSite (488), BreadcrumbList (487), ListItem (487), https://www.schema.org/SiteNavigationElement (486), LegalService (307). 19 pages with errors a rich result would fail on.
  • Near duplicates46 noted
    46 pages in 23 groups read almost the same as another page (95% alike or more).
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 491 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positions67 noted
    67 of 420 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
  • Pagination21 noted
    229 pages in pagination sequences; 21 with problems.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    1 cookie set by the site; 13 response headers recorded across 898 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 491 pages; 293 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • Spelling85 noted
    85 words an English dictionary does not know, on 222 pages. Product names and jargon will appear here too.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2315 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.advocateslaw.com scores 82%, higher than 60% of the 2315 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0571140%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 8 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 36 sites67%: 34 sites68%: 35 sites69%: 46 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 68 sites72%: 70 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 86 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 106 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 114 sites83%: 98 sites84%: 107 sites85%: 85 sites86%: 70 sites87%: 74 sites88%: 58 sites89%: 62 sites90%: 35 sites91%: 44 sites92%: 37 sites93%: 23 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 11 sites96%: 9 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 1 site100%: 70 sites82% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Your website has some significant issues that need addressing, including broken links and meta description problems. By fixing them, you can enhance user experience and SEO performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: 77 internal links lead to broken URLs, hurting user experience.

    How: Identify the broken URLs and either remove the links or redirect them to relevant existing pages.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Reduce Redirect Chains

    Why: 22 URLs have chained redirects, which can affect page performance.

    How: Minimize redirects by pointing directly to the final destination URLs whenever possible.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Address Non-200 Status Codes

    Why: 77 URLs return non-200 responses, indicating accessibility issues.

    How: Examine the URLs for errors, rectify or remove irrelevant pages, and ensure assets load properly.

    Checks: status-codes

  4. 4

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: 190 pages have title issues, which affects discoverability.

    How: Revise titles to be unique, relevant, and within 60 characters for better SEO.

    Checks: titles

  5. 5

    Revise Meta Descriptions

    Why: 292 pages have meta description issues, impacting click-through rates.

    How: Create unique meta descriptions for these pages to attract more clicks from search results.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  6. 6

    Shrink Heavy Assets

    Why: 10 assets exceed 500 KB, affecting site speed.

    How: Compress the images and stylesheet files to reduce load times.

    Checks: heavy-assets

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website has several critical security vulnerabilities that need immediate attention. Key issues include the absence of HTTP Strict Transport Security, a Content Security Policy, and Clickjacking protection. Additionally, the use of outdated JavaScript libraries poses potential risks. Addressing these issues will enhance the site's security and protect users from various attacks.

  • 0 high
  • 4 medium
  • 2 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, your site is vulnerable to man-in-the-middle attacks if users don't type 'https://'.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Lack of CSP means no restrictions on where content can load, increasing XSS risk.

    Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing Clickjacking ProtectionMedium

    Why it matters: Without prevention, your site can be embedded in iframes, potentially tricking users.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Outdated JavaScript Library (jQuery)Medium

    Why it matters: Using jQuery 3.2.0 exposes the site to known vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to version 3.5.0 or later.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  5. 5

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers may execute files as scripts, creating risks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  6. 6

    Missing Referrer PolicyLow

    Why it matters: Lack of a Referrer Policy can leak users' navigation paths to external sites.

    Fix: Add the header: Referrer-Policy: no-referrer

    Evidence: Referrer policy

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/car-accident-attorney/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 491 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/car-accident-attorney/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/car-accident-attorney/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/car-accident-attorney/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/car-accident-attorney/ → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/car-accident-attorney/ → no permissions-policy
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 3.2.0. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 3.2.0 in https://www.advocateslaw.com/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/js/placeholders.jq…: CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • NoteSoftware version disclosure

    Responses name the framework in an X-Powered-By header but hide the version.

    • server: cloudflare (898 responses)
    • x-powered-by: WP Engine (553 responses)
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • widget.reviewability.com (3 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 8 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
6 checks passed
  • OKHTTPS

    All 491 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKCookie flags

    All 1 cookie carry Secure, HttpOnly and SameSite flags.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    79 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.advocateslaw.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.advocateslaw.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.advocateslaw.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.advocateslaw.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.