Scanned sites / www.advocateslaw.com / 2026-10-23-1600

www.advocateslaw.com scan from 2026-10-23 16:00:30 UTC DR 32

A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.advocateslaw.com.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-10-23-1600

Scanned 2026-10-23 16:00:30 UTC, finished 2026-10-23 19:13:59 UTC. Found with openstreetmap overpass

Site: https://www.advocateslaw.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

82/ 100Good

On October 23, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 522 pages and 335 assets of www.advocateslaw.com, starting from https://www.advocateslaw.com/. It scored 82 out of 100, a good result. 11 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (10), meta descriptions (256), title tags (164); 9 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), meta descriptions (−4.5), title tags (−3.6). 13 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium4 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
522
Assets fetched
335
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
11 of 33
CoverageComplete crawl

857 of 857 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 300 link destinations on other sites were checked, 289 left unchecked.

  • Title tags164 issues
    164 of 384 pages have title issues. 72 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.6 points
  • Meta descriptions256 issues
    256 of 384 pages have meta description issues. 72 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.5 points
  • Headings5 issues
    5 of 384 pages have heading issues. 72 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.1 points
  • Broken links7 issues
    82 internal links point at 7 broken URLs.
    −0.3 points
  • Links to other sites2 issues
    2 destinations answered with an error, 64 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 289 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
    −0.2 points
  • Redirects61 issues
    63 redirecting URLs, 22 of them chained.
    −0.5 points
  • Non-200 responses8 issues
    72 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 66 of them are pages, 8 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.2 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability45 issues
    45 of 405 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 51 pages noindex by design.
    −1 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 2189 image references have no alt attribute. 636 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets10 issues
    10 assets larger than 500 KB among 335 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage108 issues
    9 sitemaps listing 284 URLs: 104 crawled pages missing, 3 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 1 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −1.4 points
  • Internal link counts102 noted
    Internal link counts for 456 pages; 102 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 384 pages have fewer than 200 words. 72 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate content8 issues
    1 group of pages with identical HTML.
    −0.1 points
  • URL format15 noted
    15 of 522 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals72 noted
    72 of 456 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives444 noted
    444 pages carry a robots directive; 12 carry none.
  • Anchor text92 noted
    92 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure157 noted
    157 of 384 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 72 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length117 noted
    90 images over 100 KB; 27 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies1 noted
    1 URL answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationOK
    All 456 pages keep their head tags in <head>, once each, under Googlebot's 2 MB.
  • hreflangOK
    No page declares hreflang.
  • Structured data19 noted
    454 of 384 indexable pages carry structured data: WebSite (453), BreadcrumbList (452), ListItem (452), https://www.schema.org/SiteNavigationElement (451), LegalService (310). 19 pages with errors a rich result would fail on.
  • Near duplicates46 noted
    46 pages in 23 groups read almost the same as another page (95% alike or more).
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 456 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positions70 noted
    70 of 384 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
  • Pagination24 noted
    235 pages in pagination sequences; 24 with problems.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    1 cookie set by the site; 13 response headers recorded across 857 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 456 pages; 250 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • Spelling85 noted
    85 words an English dictionary does not know, on 214 pages. Product names and jargon will appear here too.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2311 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.advocateslaw.com scores 82%, higher than 60% of the 2311 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581160%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 16 sites59%: 8 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 36 sites67%: 34 sites68%: 35 sites69%: 46 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 68 sites72%: 70 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 69 sites75%: 71 sites76%: 86 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 85 sites80%: 105 sites81%: 106 sites82%: 116 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 107 sites85%: 87 sites86%: 68 sites87%: 73 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 60 sites90%: 34 sites91%: 44 sites92%: 37 sites93%: 22 sites94%: 15 sites95%: 11 sites96%: 10 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 1 site100%: 70 sites82% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Your site has a good score, but there are key issues with broken links, redirects, and title/meta descriptions that need addressing. Prioritize fixing these for improved user experience and SEO.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: 82 internal links are broken, impacting user experience and SEO.

    How: Identify and remove or update broken links found in the crawl results.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Reduce Redirect Chains

    Why: Chaining redirects waste search engine crawl time and degrade performance.

    How: Eliminate unnecessary redirects, consolidating to a single URL when possible.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Address Non-200 Responses

    Why: 72 URLs have issues that prevent them from loading properly.

    How: Review and fix the status of non-200 response URLs, ensuring they return 200 OK.

    Checks: status-codes

  4. 4

    Update Title Tags

    Why: 164 pages have title tag issues that negatively influence SEO.

    How: Rework titles to be unique, relevant, and user-friendly, following SEO best practices.

    Checks: titles

  5. 5

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: 256 pages lack effective meta descriptions, leading to poor click-through rates.

    How: Craft unique meta descriptions for each page, summarizing content accurately.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  6. 6

    Optimize Heavy Assets

    Why: Multiple assets over 500 KB can slow down your site.

    How: Compress and optimize heavy images and stylesheets to improve load times.

    Checks: heavy-assets

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website has several critical security issues that need to be addressed to improve protection against potential attacks. Key areas of concern include missing security headers and the use of a vulnerable JavaScript library. Taking actions to implement recommended security measures will enhance your site's resilience.

  • 0 high
  • 4 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, visitors may be intercepted during their first request without HTTPS, posing security risks.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: A lack of CSP allows unrestricted sources for scripts, styles, and frames, increasing vulnerability to XSS attacks.

    Fix: Add a Content-Security-Policy header to restrict sources as needed, e.g., Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-OptionsMedium

    Why it matters: This omission allows your pages to be embedded in frames, which could lead to clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY or X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Vulnerable JavaScript Library (jQuery 3.2.0)Medium

    Why it matters: The current version of jQuery has known vulnerabilities that could be exploited based on usage.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to at least version 3.5.0 to mitigate these vulnerabilities.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  5. 5

    Missing X-Content-Type-OptionsLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers may misinterpret file types and execute malicious scripts.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  6. 6

    Missing Referrer-PolicyLow

    Why it matters: Not having a Referrer-Policy exposes users' full URLs, including sensitive information.

    Fix: Add the header: Referrer-Policy: no-referrer or Referrer-Policy: same-origin

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  7. 7

    Missing Permissions-PolicyInfo

    Why it matters: This policy can limit browser features and reduce potential impacts of malicious scripts.

    Fix: Add the header: Permissions-Policy: geolocation=(self), microphone=()

    Evidence: Permissions policy

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/car-accident-attorney/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 456 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/car-accident-attorney/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/car-accident-attorney/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/car-accident-attorney/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/car-accident-attorney/ → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/car-accident-attorney/ → no permissions-policy
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 3.2.0. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 3.2.0 in https://www.advocateslaw.com/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/js/placeholders.jq…: CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • NoteSoftware version disclosure

    Responses name the framework in an X-Powered-By header but hide the version.

    • server: cloudflare (857 responses)
    • x-powered-by: WP Engine (512 responses)
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • widget.reviewability.com (3 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 8 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
6 checks passed
  • OKHTTPS

    All 456 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKCookie flags

    All 1 cookie carry Secure, HttpOnly and SameSite flags.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    79 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.advocateslaw.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.advocateslaw.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.advocateslaw.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.advocateslaw.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.