Scanned sites / studiobelle.ca / 2026-09-13-0222
studiobelle.ca scan from 2026-09-13 02:22:29 UTC DR 34
DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.
Scan 2026-09-13-0222
Scanned 2026-09-13 02:22:29 UTC, finished 2026-09-13 02:43:48 UTC. Found on page 2 of brave web search results
Site: https://studiobelle.ca/
Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.
On September 13, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 87 pages and 374 assets of studiobelle.ca, starting from https://studiobelle.ca/. It scored 68 out of 100, a result that needs work. 12 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (56), meta descriptions (58), heavy assets (74); 8 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−8), meta descriptions (−6.6), heavy assets (−6). 7 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.
Security review: Medium2 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓
- Pages crawled
- 87
- Assets fetched
- 374
- Status
- Completed
- Checks with issues
- 12 of 27
461 of 462 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 47 link destinations on other sites were checked.
- Title tags56 issues56 of 60 pages have title issues. 10 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−8 points
- Meta descriptions58 issues58 of 60 pages have meta description issues. 10 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−6.6 points
- Headings27 issues27 of 60 pages have heading issues. 10 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−2.3 points
- Broken links8 issues8 internal links point at 8 broken URLs.−2.3 points
- Links to other sites2 issues2 destinations answered with an error, 21 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 47 destinations checked.−0.8 points
- Redirects10 issues9 redirecting URLs, 3 of them chained.−0.6 points
- Non-200 responses8 issues22 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 17 of them are pages, 8 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.−1.1 points
- Rate limitedOKThe site did not rate limit the crawler.
- Indexability9 issues9 of 60 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 10 pages noindex by design. 9 noindex pages are listed in the sitemap, which asks search engines both to visit and to ignore them.−1.3 points
- Image alt textOK0 of 2 image references have no alt attribute. 1 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
- Heavy assets74 issues74 assets larger than 500 KB among 374 fetched assets. 3 documents over that size are listed but not counted: downloads are not page weight.−6 points
- Orphan pages1 issue1 page have no internal links pointing at them.−0.1 points
- Sitemap coverage25 issues2 sitemaps listing 58 URLs: 13 crawled pages missing, 1 listed URL broken or redirecting, 2 reachable only via the sitemap.−2.1 points
- Internal link counts10 notedInternal link counts for 70 pages; 10 worth a look.
- Thin content7 issues7 of 60 pages have fewer than 200 words. 10 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−0.8 points
- Duplicate contentOK0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
- URL format3 noted3 of 87 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
- CanonicalsOK0 of 70 pages have a canonical worth checking.
- Robots directives70 noted70 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
- Anchor text2 noted2 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
- Title and heading structure27 noted27 of 60 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 10 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Image weight and alt lengthOKNo image is over 100 KB or carries alt text over 100 characters.
- Response anomalies5 noted5 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
- HTML and head validationNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- hreflangNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- Structured dataNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- Near duplicatesNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- Soft 404sOKNone of 70 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
- AccessibilityNot checkedNot checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
- Link positionsNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
- PaginationNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- Headers and cookiesOK0 cookies set by the site; 13 response headers recorded across 461 URLs.
- Orphans in searchNot checkedNot checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
- Link ScoreOKLink Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 70 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
- JavaScript renderingNot checkedNot checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
- PageSpeed Insights5 notedMobile performance 45 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
- SpellingNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
Where this scan sits among all scanned sites
2873 sites, median 80%, average 79%
studiobelle.ca scores 68%, higher than 13% of the 2873 scanned sites. See the full ranking.
Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).
Internal link map
Loading the link map...
Fix plan
Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findingsWritten from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.
The site has multiple issues impacting SEO, including broken links and title/meta description problems. Prioritizing these fixes will enhance search rankings and user experience.
- 1
Fix Broken Links
Why: Improving link structure enhances user experience and SEO.
How: Update the internal links pointing to broken URLs with the correct URLs.
Checks: broken-links
- 2
Resolve Redirect Chains
Why: Reducing redirect chains improves page load speed and SEO efficiency.
How: Eliminate unnecessary redirects by linking directly to final destinations.
Checks: redirects
- 3
Address Non-200 Responses
Why: Ensuring every URL is reachable enhances search engine crawlability.
How: Fix or update URLs that return 404 or non-200 statuses.
Checks: status-codes
- 4
Optimize Title Tags
Why: Concise and relevant title tags improve rankings and click-through rates.
How: Shorten title tags to under 60 characters, maintaining key phrases.
Checks: titles
- 5
Implement Meta Descriptions
Why: Meta descriptions increase the likelihood of clicks in search results.
How: Add unique and compelling meta descriptions for pages missing them.
Checks: meta-descriptions
- 6
Fix Sitemap Issues
Why: Accurate sitemaps improve crawlability and indexing by search engines.
How: Update the sitemap to remove broken URLs and ensure all pages are listed correctly.
Checks: sitemap-coverage
Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.
Security review
Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawlYour website has several important security headers missing, which can expose it to various attacks such as clickjacking and script vulnerabilities. Implementing the recommended headers will strengthen your site's defenses.
- 0 high
- 2 medium
- 2 low
- 1 info
- 1
Missing Content Security PolicyMedium
Why it matters: Without a Content Security Policy, the site is vulnerable to cross-site scripting and data injection attacks.
Fix: Add the following HTTP header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';
Evidence: Content Security Policy
- 2
Missing X-Frame-OptionsMedium
Why it matters: The absence of this header allows clickjacking attacks by letting other sites embed your pages in frames.
Fix: Add the X-Frame-Options header: X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN;
Evidence: Clickjacking protection
- 3
Missing X-Content-Type-OptionsLow
Why it matters: Without this header, browsers may execute files as scripts regardless of their declared MIME type, potentially leading to security issues.
Fix: Add the X-Content-Type-Options header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff;
Evidence: MIME sniffing protection
- 4
Third-party Scripts without SRILow
Why it matters: Scripts from third-party domains may change unexpectedly, risking site integrity.
Fix: Consider adding Subresource Integrity (SRI) to the scripts or implement a Content Security Policy to restrict source.
Evidence: Third-party scripts
- 5
Sensitive Path in robots.txtInfo
Why it matters: The robots.txt file exposes a private path that could provide insight to attackers.
Fix: Restrict access to sensitive paths using proper authentication mechanisms.
Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt
What the checks found
- FoundContent Security PolicyMedium
None of the 70 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.
- https://studiobelle.ca/ → no content-security-policy
- https://studiobelle.ca/calgaryheadshotsphotographer/ → no content-security-policy
- https://studiobelle.ca/calgary-top-family-photographer/ → no content-security-policy
- https://studiobelle.ca/calgaryboudoirphotographer/ → no content-security-policy
- https://studiobelle.ca/calgary-glamour-photography/ → no content-security-policy
- https://studiobelle.ca/calgary_maternity_photography/ → no content-security-policy
- https://studiobelle.ca/couples/ → no content-security-policy
- https://studiobelle.ca/birthday/ → no content-security-policy
- https://studiobelle.ca/legacy-portrait-sessions/ → no content-security-policy
- https://studiobelle.ca/booksession/ → no content-security-policy
- https://studiobelle.ca/meet-the-team/ → no content-security-policy
- https://studiobelle.ca/faqs/ → no content-security-policy
- FoundClickjacking protectionMedium
No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.
- https://studiobelle.ca/ → no x-frame-options
- https://studiobelle.ca/calgaryheadshotsphotographer/ → no x-frame-options
- https://studiobelle.ca/calgary-top-family-photographer/ → no x-frame-options
- https://studiobelle.ca/calgaryboudoirphotographer/ → no x-frame-options
- https://studiobelle.ca/calgary-glamour-photography/ → no x-frame-options
- https://studiobelle.ca/calgary_maternity_photography/ → no x-frame-options
- https://studiobelle.ca/couples/ → no x-frame-options
- https://studiobelle.ca/birthday/ → no x-frame-options
- https://studiobelle.ca/legacy-portrait-sessions/ → no x-frame-options
- https://studiobelle.ca/booksession/ → no x-frame-options
- https://studiobelle.ca/meet-the-team/ → no x-frame-options
- https://studiobelle.ca/faqs/ → no x-frame-options
- FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow
No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.
- https://studiobelle.ca/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://studiobelle.ca/calgaryheadshotsphotographer/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://studiobelle.ca/calgary-top-family-photographer/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://studiobelle.ca/calgaryboudoirphotographer/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://studiobelle.ca/calgary-glamour-photography/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://studiobelle.ca/calgary_maternity_photography/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://studiobelle.ca/couples/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://studiobelle.ca/birthday/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://studiobelle.ca/legacy-portrait-sessions/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://studiobelle.ca/booksession/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://studiobelle.ca/meet-the-team/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://studiobelle.ca/faqs/ → no x-content-type-options
- NoteThird-party scripts
Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)
- www.googletagmanager.com (200 script tags)
- link.msgsndr.com (8 script tags)
- NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt
robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
7 checks passed, 4 not applicable
- OKHTTPS
All 70 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.
- OKHTTP Strict Transport Security
strict-transport-security is set on all 70 HTML pages.
- OKSoftware version disclosure
The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.
- OKMixed content
No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.
- OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries
1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.
- OKKeys and secrets in page code
No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.
- OKExposed files and listings
None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.
- Not applicableReferrer policy
This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.
- Not applicablePermissions policy
This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.
- Not applicableCookie flags
This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.
- Not applicableForms over HTTPS
No forms were found on the sampled pages.
A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.
Sites scoring near studiobelle.ca
Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.
- protechsteel.comDR 2668/100 · rank 2459 · 35 pages
- dopl.idaho.govDR 9068/100 · rank 2459 · 793 pages
- southboisept.comDR 268/100 · rank 2459 · 6 pages
- crystalmadsen.comDR 1568/100 · rank 2459 · 635 pages
- venncoffeeroasters.comDR 568/100 · rank 2459 · 17 pages
- sklandscapingservices.comDR 068/100 · rank 2459 · 19 pages
DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.
This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling studiobelle.ca from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.
Own studiobelle.ca?
- Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
- Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming studiobelle.ca. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.