Scanned sites / dopl.idaho.gov

SEO report for dopl.idaho.gov DR 90

The latest Site Spider scan of dopl.idaho.gov, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/dopl-idaho-gov/2026-09-13-2317.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-13 23:17:26 UTC, finished 2026-09-14 01:06:29 UTC. Found on page 2 of brave web search results

Site: https://dopl.idaho.gov/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

68/ 100Needs work

On September 13, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 793 pages and 2317 assets of dopl.idaho.gov, starting from https://dopl.idaho.gov/. It scored 68 out of 100, a result that needs work. 12 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (627), meta descriptions (631), sitemap coverage (631); 6 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−9.9), meta descriptions (−8), sitemap coverage (−6). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium4 medium and 1 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
793
Assets fetched
2317
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
12 of 27
CoverageJob finished, partial coverage

3,110 of 3,118 discovered URLs were fetched, 98 left out by the 5,000-page and 1,000-asset budget. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 300 link destinations on other sites were checked, 716 left unchecked.

  • Title tags627 issues
    627 of 631 pages have title issues.
    −9.9 points
  • Meta descriptions631 issues
    631 of 631 pages have meta description issues.
    −8 points
  • Headings9 issues
    9 of 631 pages have heading issues.
    −0.1 points
  • Broken links11 issues
    12 internal links point at 11 broken URLs.
    −0.3 points
  • Links to other sites77 issues
    77 destinations answered with an error, 164 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 716 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
    −4 points
  • Redirects150 issues
    151 redirecting URLs, 3 of them chained.
    −1 points
  • Non-200 responses12 issues
    164 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 162 of them are pages, 12 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.2 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability1 issue
    1 of 631 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 7 image references have no alt attribute. 1 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets3 issues
    3 assets larger than 500 KB among 2317 fetched assets. 200 documents over that size are listed but not counted: downloads are not page weight.
    −1.8 points
  • Orphan pages50 issues
    50 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.3 points
  • Sitemap coverage631 issues
    1 sitemap listing 0 URLs: 631 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −6 points
  • Internal link counts188 noted
    Internal link counts for 500 pages; 188 worth a look.
  • Thin content1 issue
    1 of 631 pages have fewer than 200 words.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format88 noted
    88 of 793 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals1 noted
    1 of 631 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives630 noted
    630 pages carry a robots directive; 1 carries none.
  • Anchor text9 noted
    9 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure474 noted
    474 of 631 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
  • Image weight and alt length2 noted
    0 images over 100 KB; 2 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies60 noted
    60 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 631 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 12 response headers recorded across 3110 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 631 pages; 189 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 47 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2873 sites, median 80%, average 79%

dopl.idaho.gov scores 68%, higher than 13% of the 2873 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751500%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 43 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 80 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 132 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 128 sites81%: 125 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 119 sites84%: 130 sites85%: 106 sites86%: 95 sites87%: 96 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 75 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 59 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 29 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 15 sites96%: 18 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 8 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 150 sites68% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site has several significant SEO issues impacting performance and user experience. Addressing broken links, redirects, title and meta description issues will enhance visibility and functionality.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: 12 internal links are broken, leading to 404 errors, affecting user experience.

    How: Update or remove links pointing to broken URLs as listed in the broken-links report.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Redirects

    Why: 151 URLs are redirecting, some are chained, causing unnecessary delays.

    How: Eliminate unnecessary redirects by redirecting directly to the final URL and remove chains.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Correct Title Tags

    Why: 627 pages have title issues which hinder search optimization.

    How: Ensure each page has a unique title under 60 characters that accurately describes the page content.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Add Meta Descriptions

    Why: 631 pages lack meta descriptions, limiting click-through rates from search engines.

    How: Create unique meta descriptions under 160 characters for each page summarizing the content.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Address Heading Structure

    Why: 9 pages are missing H1 tags, which is crucial for SEO.

    How: Add a concise H1 tag to each page that clearly represents its primary topic.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Review Sitemap Coverage

    Why: 1 sitemap covering 0 URLs means many pages aren't indexed.

    How: Create a valid sitemap that includes all 631 crawled pages and submit it to search engines.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The site lacks important security headers, exposing users to various risks like interception and clickjacking. Additionally, vulnerable JavaScript libraries are present. Immediate action is needed to implement security headers and update libraries.

  • 0 high
  • 4 medium
  • 1 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users accessing the site via HTTP can be intercepted.

    Fix: Add 'Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload' to HTTP response headers.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: The absence of CSP allows unrestricted loading of scripts and styles, increasing XSS risks.

    Fix: Implement a CSP header, for example: 'Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';'.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without this header, the site is vulnerable to clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add 'X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN' to the HTTP response headers.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Vulnerable JavaScript LibrariesMedium

    Why it matters: Using outdated jQuery versions exposes the site to known vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to version 3.5.0 or higher to mitigate risks.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  5. 5

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Lack of this header may allow browsers to incorrectly interpret file types.

    Fix: Add 'X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff' to the HTTP response headers.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://dopl.idaho.gov/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://dopl.idaho.gov/contact/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://dopl.idaho.gov/ala/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://dopl.idaho.gov/bld/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://dopl.idaho.gov/con/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://dopl.idaho.gov/dpb/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://dopl.idaho.gov/wwp/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://dopl.idaho.gov/ele/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://dopl.idaho.gov/elev/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://dopl.idaho.gov/geo/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://dopl.idaho.gov/hvac/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://dopl.idaho.gov/lpg/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 631 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://dopl.idaho.gov/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://dopl.idaho.gov/contact/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://dopl.idaho.gov/ala/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://dopl.idaho.gov/bld/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://dopl.idaho.gov/con/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://dopl.idaho.gov/dpb/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://dopl.idaho.gov/wwp/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://dopl.idaho.gov/ele/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://dopl.idaho.gov/elev/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://dopl.idaho.gov/geo/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://dopl.idaho.gov/hvac/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://dopl.idaho.gov/lpg/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://dopl.idaho.gov/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://dopl.idaho.gov/contact/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://dopl.idaho.gov/ala/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://dopl.idaho.gov/bld/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://dopl.idaho.gov/con/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://dopl.idaho.gov/dpb/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://dopl.idaho.gov/wwp/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://dopl.idaho.gov/ele/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://dopl.idaho.gov/elev/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://dopl.idaho.gov/geo/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://dopl.idaho.gov/hvac/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://dopl.idaho.gov/lpg/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://dopl.idaho.gov/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://dopl.idaho.gov/contact/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://dopl.idaho.gov/ala/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://dopl.idaho.gov/bld/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://dopl.idaho.gov/con/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://dopl.idaho.gov/dpb/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://dopl.idaho.gov/wwp/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://dopl.idaho.gov/ele/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://dopl.idaho.gov/elev/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://dopl.idaho.gov/geo/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://dopl.idaho.gov/hvac/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://dopl.idaho.gov/lpg/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    2 libraries with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 1.9.1, jQuery 2.5.21. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 1.9.1 in https://dopl.idaho.gov/wp-content/themes/Webmaster-Alternate/js/bootstrap.min.j…: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
    • jQuery 2.5.21 in https://dopl.idaho.gov/wp-content/plugins/search-filter-pro/public/assets/js/ch…: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • connect.facebook.net (40 script tags)
    • www.google.com (40 script tags)
7 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 631 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    160 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of dopl.idaho.gov

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near dopl.idaho.gov

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling dopl.idaho.gov from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own dopl.idaho.gov?