Scanned sites / sklandscapingservices.com

SEO report for sklandscapingservices.com DR 0

The latest Site Spider scan of sklandscapingservices.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/sklandscapingservices-com/2026-09-12-0917.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-12 09:17:11 UTC, finished 2026-09-12 10:50:56 UTC

Site: https://sklandscapingservices.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

68/ 100Needs work

On September 12, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 19 pages and 272 assets of sklandscapingservices.com, starting from https://sklandscapingservices.com/. It scored 68 out of 100, a result that needs work. 8 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (18), title tags (12), heavy assets (72); 8 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−7.6), title tags (−6.3), heavy assets (−6). 11 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
19
Assets fetched
272
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
8 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

291 of 292 discovered URLs were fetched, 1 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 12 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags12 issues
    12 of 18 pages have title issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −6.3 points
  • Meta descriptions18 issues
    18 of 18 pages have meta description issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −7.6 points
  • Headings18 issues
    18 of 18 pages have heading issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −5.7 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites21 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 2 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 10 destinations checked.
  • Redirects1 noted
    1 redirecting URL, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responses1 noted
    1 URL did not return a 2xx response. 0 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability2 issues
    2 of 18 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 1 page noindex by design.
    −1.1 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 110 image references have no alt attribute. 59 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets72 issues
    72 assets larger than 500 KB among 272 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages4 issues
    4 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.8 points
  • Sitemap coverage4 issues
    5 sitemaps listing 18 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 4 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −1.3 points
  • Internal link counts1 noted
    Internal link counts for 19 pages; 1 worth a look.
  • Thin content7 issues
    7 of 18 pages have fewer than 200 words. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −2.9 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format1 noted
    1 of 19 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals3 noted
    3 of 19 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives19 noted
    19 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text2 noted
    2 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure11 noted
    11 of 18 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length34 noted
    34 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 19 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 11 response headers recorded across 291 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 19 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 59 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2873 sites, median 80%, average 79%

sklandscapingservices.com scores 68%, higher than 13% of the 2873 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751500%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 43 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 80 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 132 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 128 sites81%: 125 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 119 sites84%: 130 sites85%: 106 sites86%: 95 sites87%: 96 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 75 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 59 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 29 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 15 sites96%: 18 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 8 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 150 sites68% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Several SEO issues need attention, particularly with title tags, meta descriptions, and orphan pages. Prioritizing these can significantly enhance your site's SEO performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Redirects can confuse search engines and users.

    How: Update the sitemap URL to the final URL (https://sklandscapingservices.com/wp-sitemap.xml).

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Update Title Tags

    Why: Short title tags limit visibility in search engine results.

    How: Extend titles to 50-60 characters for affected pages (e.g., About, Contact).

    Checks: titles

  3. 3

    Create Meta Descriptions

    Why: Missing meta descriptions lead to less attractive search results.

    How: Write unique, relevant meta descriptions for all pages, ideally 50-160 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  4. 4

    Resolve Heading Issues

    Why: Multiple H1 tags can mislead search engines about page structure.

    How: Adjust pages to ensure only one H1 tag per page, using H2s for subheadings.

    Checks: headings

  5. 5

    Address Orphan Pages

    Why: Orphan pages can hinder user navigation and SEO value.

    How: Add internal links to orphan pages from other relevant pages.

    Checks: orphan-pages

  6. 6

    Enhance Thin Content

    Why: Pages with low word count may not be valued by search engines.

    How: Add valuable content to thin pages (e.g., Services, Our Work) to exceed 200 words.

    Checks: thin-content

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website has several important security headers missing, exposing it to risks such as interception and content injection. Implementing simple changes to HTTP headers can significantly enhance your security posture.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, visitors can be intercepted when accessing the site without HTTPS.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Lack of CSP allows attackers to load malicious scripts or styles.

    Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-OptionsMedium

    Why it matters: Without this, your pages can be embedded in frames by other sites, risking clickjacking.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-OptionsLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers may incorrectly execute files as scripts.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Third-Party Scripts without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Without SRI, scripts from external domains can be manipulated.

    Fix: Consider adding a CSP or verifying the external scripts' integrity.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  6. 6

    Sensitive Path in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: Publicly accessible paths in robots.txt can be used by attackers to find sensitive areas.

    Fix: Implement proper access control for sensitive directories like /wp-admin/.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://sklandscapingservices.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://sklandscapingservices.com/contact/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://sklandscapingservices.com/about/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://sklandscapingservices.com/landscaping/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://sklandscapingservices.com/hardscaping/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://sklandscapingservices.com/pavers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://sklandscapingservices.com/property-cleanups/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://sklandscapingservices.com/commercial-maintenance/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://sklandscapingservices.com/trimming-and-pruning/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://sklandscapingservices.com/fencing/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://sklandscapingservices.com/spokane/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://sklandscapingservices.com/services/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 19 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://sklandscapingservices.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://sklandscapingservices.com/contact/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://sklandscapingservices.com/about/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://sklandscapingservices.com/landscaping/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://sklandscapingservices.com/hardscaping/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://sklandscapingservices.com/pavers/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://sklandscapingservices.com/property-cleanups/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://sklandscapingservices.com/commercial-maintenance/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://sklandscapingservices.com/trimming-and-pruning/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://sklandscapingservices.com/fencing/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://sklandscapingservices.com/spokane/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://sklandscapingservices.com/services/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://sklandscapingservices.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://sklandscapingservices.com/contact/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://sklandscapingservices.com/about/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://sklandscapingservices.com/landscaping/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://sklandscapingservices.com/hardscaping/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://sklandscapingservices.com/pavers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://sklandscapingservices.com/property-cleanups/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://sklandscapingservices.com/commercial-maintenance/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://sklandscapingservices.com/trimming-and-pruning/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://sklandscapingservices.com/fencing/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://sklandscapingservices.com/spokane/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://sklandscapingservices.com/services/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://sklandscapingservices.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://sklandscapingservices.com/contact/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://sklandscapingservices.com/about/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://sklandscapingservices.com/landscaping/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://sklandscapingservices.com/hardscaping/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://sklandscapingservices.com/pavers/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://sklandscapingservices.com/property-cleanups/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://sklandscapingservices.com/commercial-maintenance/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://sklandscapingservices.com/trimming-and-pruning/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://sklandscapingservices.com/fencing/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://sklandscapingservices.com/spokane/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://sklandscapingservices.com/services/ → no x-content-type-options
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (19 script tags)
    • www.google.com (19 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
7 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 19 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    21 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of sklandscapingservices.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near sklandscapingservices.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling sklandscapingservices.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own sklandscapingservices.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming sklandscapingservices.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.