Scanned sites / studiobelle.ca

SEO report for studiobelle.ca DR 34

The latest Site Spider scan of studiobelle.ca, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/studiobelle-ca/2026-09-13-0222.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-13 02:22:29 UTC, finished 2026-09-13 02:43:48 UTC. Found on page 2 of brave web search results

Site: https://studiobelle.ca/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

68/ 100Needs work

On September 13, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 87 pages and 374 assets of studiobelle.ca, starting from https://studiobelle.ca/. It scored 68 out of 100, a result that needs work. 12 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (56), meta descriptions (58), heavy assets (74); 8 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−8), meta descriptions (−6.6), heavy assets (−6). 7 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium2 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
87
Assets fetched
374
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
12 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

461 of 462 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 47 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags56 issues
    56 of 60 pages have title issues. 10 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −8 points
  • Meta descriptions58 issues
    58 of 60 pages have meta description issues. 10 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −6.6 points
  • Headings27 issues
    27 of 60 pages have heading issues. 10 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.3 points
  • Broken links8 issues
    8 internal links point at 8 broken URLs.
    −2.3 points
  • Links to other sites2 issues
    2 destinations answered with an error, 21 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 47 destinations checked.
    −0.8 points
  • Redirects10 issues
    9 redirecting URLs, 3 of them chained.
    −0.6 points
  • Non-200 responses8 issues
    22 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 17 of them are pages, 8 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −1.1 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability9 issues
    9 of 60 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 10 pages noindex by design. 9 noindex pages are listed in the sitemap, which asks search engines both to visit and to ignore them.
    −1.3 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 2 image references have no alt attribute. 1 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets74 issues
    74 assets larger than 500 KB among 374 fetched assets. 3 documents over that size are listed but not counted: downloads are not page weight.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages1 issue
    1 page have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.1 points
  • Sitemap coverage25 issues
    2 sitemaps listing 58 URLs: 13 crawled pages missing, 1 listed URL broken or redirecting, 2 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −2.1 points
  • Internal link counts10 noted
    Internal link counts for 70 pages; 10 worth a look.
  • Thin content7 issues
    7 of 60 pages have fewer than 200 words. 10 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.8 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format3 noted
    3 of 87 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 70 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives70 noted
    70 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text2 noted
    2 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure27 noted
    27 of 60 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 10 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt lengthOK
    No image is over 100 KB or carries alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies5 noted
    5 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 70 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 13 response headers recorded across 461 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 70 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 45 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2873 sites, median 80%, average 79%

studiobelle.ca scores 68%, higher than 13% of the 2873 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751500%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 43 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 80 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 132 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 128 sites81%: 125 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 119 sites84%: 130 sites85%: 106 sites86%: 95 sites87%: 96 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 75 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 59 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 29 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 15 sites96%: 18 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 8 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 150 sites68% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

The site has multiple issues impacting SEO, including broken links and title/meta description problems. Prioritizing these fixes will enhance search rankings and user experience.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Improving link structure enhances user experience and SEO.

    How: Update the internal links pointing to broken URLs with the correct URLs.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Redirect Chains

    Why: Reducing redirect chains improves page load speed and SEO efficiency.

    How: Eliminate unnecessary redirects by linking directly to final destinations.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Address Non-200 Responses

    Why: Ensuring every URL is reachable enhances search engine crawlability.

    How: Fix or update URLs that return 404 or non-200 statuses.

    Checks: status-codes

  4. 4

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: Concise and relevant title tags improve rankings and click-through rates.

    How: Shorten title tags to under 60 characters, maintaining key phrases.

    Checks: titles

  5. 5

    Implement Meta Descriptions

    Why: Meta descriptions increase the likelihood of clicks in search results.

    How: Add unique and compelling meta descriptions for pages missing them.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  6. 6

    Fix Sitemap Issues

    Why: Accurate sitemaps improve crawlability and indexing by search engines.

    How: Update the sitemap to remove broken URLs and ensure all pages are listed correctly.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website has several important security headers missing, which can expose it to various attacks such as clickjacking and script vulnerabilities. Implementing the recommended headers will strengthen your site's defenses.

  • 0 high
  • 2 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: Without a Content Security Policy, the site is vulnerable to cross-site scripting and data injection attacks.

    Fix: Add the following HTTP header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  2. 2

    Missing X-Frame-OptionsMedium

    Why it matters: The absence of this header allows clickjacking attacks by letting other sites embed your pages in frames.

    Fix: Add the X-Frame-Options header: X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN;

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  3. 3

    Missing X-Content-Type-OptionsLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers may execute files as scripts regardless of their declared MIME type, potentially leading to security issues.

    Fix: Add the X-Content-Type-Options header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff;

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  4. 4

    Third-party Scripts without SRILow

    Why it matters: Scripts from third-party domains may change unexpectedly, risking site integrity.

    Fix: Consider adding Subresource Integrity (SRI) to the scripts or implement a Content Security Policy to restrict source.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  5. 5

    Sensitive Path in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The robots.txt file exposes a private path that could provide insight to attackers.

    Fix: Restrict access to sensitive paths using proper authentication mechanisms.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 70 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://studiobelle.ca/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://studiobelle.ca/calgaryheadshotsphotographer/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://studiobelle.ca/calgary-top-family-photographer/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://studiobelle.ca/calgaryboudoirphotographer/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://studiobelle.ca/calgary-glamour-photography/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://studiobelle.ca/calgary_maternity_photography/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://studiobelle.ca/couples/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://studiobelle.ca/birthday/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://studiobelle.ca/legacy-portrait-sessions/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://studiobelle.ca/booksession/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://studiobelle.ca/meet-the-team/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://studiobelle.ca/faqs/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://studiobelle.ca/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://studiobelle.ca/calgaryheadshotsphotographer/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://studiobelle.ca/calgary-top-family-photographer/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://studiobelle.ca/calgaryboudoirphotographer/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://studiobelle.ca/calgary-glamour-photography/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://studiobelle.ca/calgary_maternity_photography/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://studiobelle.ca/couples/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://studiobelle.ca/birthday/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://studiobelle.ca/legacy-portrait-sessions/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://studiobelle.ca/booksession/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://studiobelle.ca/meet-the-team/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://studiobelle.ca/faqs/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://studiobelle.ca/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://studiobelle.ca/calgaryheadshotsphotographer/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://studiobelle.ca/calgary-top-family-photographer/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://studiobelle.ca/calgaryboudoirphotographer/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://studiobelle.ca/calgary-glamour-photography/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://studiobelle.ca/calgary_maternity_photography/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://studiobelle.ca/couples/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://studiobelle.ca/birthday/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://studiobelle.ca/legacy-portrait-sessions/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://studiobelle.ca/booksession/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://studiobelle.ca/meet-the-team/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://studiobelle.ca/faqs/ → no x-content-type-options
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (200 script tags)
    • link.msgsndr.com (8 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
7 checks passed, 4 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 70 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 70 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableForms over HTTPS

    No forms were found on the sampled pages.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of studiobelle.ca

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near studiobelle.ca

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling studiobelle.ca from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own studiobelle.ca?