Scanned sites / cleanline.ca / 2026-09-10-1411

cleanline.ca scan from 2026-09-10 14:11:07 UTC DR 17

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-10-1411

Scanned 2026-09-10 14:11:07 UTC, finished 2026-09-10 18:25:38 UTC

Site: https://cleanline.ca/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

83/ 100Good

On September 10, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 335 pages and 249 assets of cleanline.ca, starting from https://cleanline.ca/. It scored 83 out of 100, a good result. 10 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (14), meta descriptions (156), title tags (114); 7 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), meta descriptions (−4), title tags (−3.6). 10 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium and 1 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
335
Assets fetched
249
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
10 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

584 of 590 discovered URLs were fetched, 6 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 133 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags114 issues
    114 of 216 pages have title issues. 98 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.6 points
  • Meta descriptions156 issues
    156 of 216 pages have meta description issues. 98 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4 points
  • Headings19 issues
    19 of 216 pages have heading issues. 98 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.4 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites11 issues
    11 destinations answered with an error, 70 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 133 destinations checked.
    −1.4 points
  • Redirects22 issues
    21 redirecting URLs, 1 of them chained.
    −0.3 points
  • Non-200 responses22 noted
    22 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 21 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability1 issue
    1 of 218 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 96 pages noindex by design.
  • Image alt text27 issues
    27 of 379 image references have no alt attribute. 6 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
    −0.4 points
  • Heavy assets14 issues
    14 assets larger than 500 KB among 249 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages1 issue
    1 page have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage27 issues
    5 sitemaps listing 191 URLs: 26 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 1 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.5 points
  • Internal link counts110 noted
    Internal link counts for 314 pages; 110 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 216 pages have fewer than 200 words. 98 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format102 noted
    102 of 335 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals98 noted
    98 of 314 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives314 noted
    314 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text141 noted
    141 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure34 noted
    34 of 216 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 98 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length10 noted
    10 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies1 noted
    1 URL answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 314 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 16 response headers recorded across 584 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 314 pages; 271 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 47 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2316 sites, median 79%, average 78%

cleanline.ca scores 83%, higher than 65% of the 2316 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581150%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 8 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 35 sites69%: 46 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 68 sites72%: 70 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 86 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 105 sites81%: 104 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 108 sites85%: 85 sites86%: 69 sites87%: 74 sites88%: 60 sites89%: 61 sites90%: 33 sites91%: 46 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 22 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 11 sites96%: 9 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 1 site100%: 70 sites83% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site has a good health score, but several issues need fixing to enhance SEO. Prioritize correcting redirects and non-200 responses, followed by title and meta description improvements. Address alt text for images and ensure orphan pages are linked.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: 21 URLs redirect, including 1 chained, affecting user experience and SEO.

    How: Update URLs to link directly instead of redirecting. Fix or remove unnecessary redirects.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: 22 URLs return non-200 statuses which can harm SEO visibility.

    How: Check server or CMS settings to ensure these pages return a 2xx response, or remove them.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: 114 pages have title issues, impacting search rankings.

    How: Shorten long title tags to under 60 characters to improve clarity.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: 49 pages have meta description issues, affecting click-through rates.

    How: Create unique, concise meta descriptions under 160 characters for better engagement.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Add Alt Text to Images

    Why: 27 images lack alt attributes which can limit SEO potential.

    How: Add relevant alt text for descriptive purposes, improving accessibility and search visibility.

    Checks: images-alt

  6. 6

    Link Orphan Page

    Why: 1 orphan page lacks internal links, decreasing its visibility.

    How: Add internal links pointing to this page from relevant content to improve discoverability.

    Checks: orphan-pages

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website cleanline.ca has several security issues that need to be addressed, including missing critical HTTP headers and the use of outdated libraries. Immediate actions are recommended to enhance security and protect user data.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 1 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, connections initiated without HTTPS can be intercepted.

    Fix: Add the header `Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains`.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Outdated JavaScript Libraries Vulnerable to AttacksMedium

    Why it matters: Using vulnerable versions of jQuery can expose the site to potential exploitation.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to version 3.5.0 or higher.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  3. 3

    Leaked Google API Key FoundMedium

    Why it matters: The API key in public code can lead to unauthorized access if not secured properly.

    Fix: Restrict the API key in the Google Cloud console by setting HTTP referrer restrictions.

    Evidence: Keys and secrets in page code

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers may incorrectly interpret content types.

    Fix: Add the header `X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff`.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    218 of 314 HTML pages send strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://cleanline.ca/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fcleanline.ca%2Fwhat-cant-i-put-down-my-garbage-disposal%2F → no strict-transport-security
    • https://cleanline.ca/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fcleanline.ca%2F5-common-spring-plumbing-problems%2F → no strict-transport-security
    • https://cleanline.ca/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fcleanline.ca%2Ffall-plumbing-tips%2F → no strict-transport-security
    • https://cleanline.ca/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fcleanline.ca%2Fhow-to-choose-a-water-heater%2F → no strict-transport-security
    • https://cleanline.ca/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fcleanline.ca%2F9-common-septic-tank-problems%2F → no strict-transport-security
    • https://cleanline.ca/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fcleanline.ca%2Fwhat-to-look-for-in-a-commercial-plumber%2F → no strict-transport-security
    • https://cleanline.ca/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fcleanline.ca%2Fhow-to-clean-your-garbage-disposal%2F → no strict-transport-security
    • https://cleanline.ca/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fcleanline.ca%2Fhow-to-improve-the-flow-of-your-drains%2F → no strict-transport-security
    • https://cleanline.ca/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fcleanline.ca%2Fhow-to-determine-sizing-for-your-commercial-… → no strict-transport-security
    • https://cleanline.ca/wp-login.php?action=lostpassword → no strict-transport-security
    • https://cleanline.ca/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fcleanline.ca%2Fsigns-of-high-water-pressure-in-your-house%2F → no strict-transport-security
    • https://cleanline.ca/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fcleanline.ca%2Fcan-you-put-coffee-grounds-down-the-sink%2F → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    218 of 314 HTML pages send x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://cleanline.ca/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fcleanline.ca%2Fwhat-cant-i-put-down-my-garbage-disposal%2F → no x-content-type-options
    • https://cleanline.ca/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fcleanline.ca%2F5-common-spring-plumbing-problems%2F → no x-content-type-options
    • https://cleanline.ca/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fcleanline.ca%2Ffall-plumbing-tips%2F → no x-content-type-options
    • https://cleanline.ca/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fcleanline.ca%2Fhow-to-choose-a-water-heater%2F → no x-content-type-options
    • https://cleanline.ca/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fcleanline.ca%2F9-common-septic-tank-problems%2F → no x-content-type-options
    • https://cleanline.ca/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fcleanline.ca%2Fwhat-to-look-for-in-a-commercial-plumber%2F → no x-content-type-options
    • https://cleanline.ca/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fcleanline.ca%2Fhow-to-clean-your-garbage-disposal%2F → no x-content-type-options
    • https://cleanline.ca/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fcleanline.ca%2Fhow-to-improve-the-flow-of-your-drains%2F → no x-content-type-options
    • https://cleanline.ca/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fcleanline.ca%2Fhow-to-determine-sizing-for-your-commercial-… → no x-content-type-options
    • https://cleanline.ca/wp-login.php?action=lostpassword → no x-content-type-options
    • https://cleanline.ca/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fcleanline.ca%2Fsigns-of-high-water-pressure-in-your-house%2F → no x-content-type-options
    • https://cleanline.ca/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fcleanline.ca%2Fcan-you-put-coffee-grounds-down-the-sink%2F → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    2 libraries with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 1.7.0, jQuery 3.1.1. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 1.7.0 in https://cleanline.ca/wp-content/themes/salient/js/build/third-party/hoverintent…: CVE-2012-6708 (selector XSS), CVE-2015-9251, CVE-2019-11358, CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023; fixed in 3.5.0
    • jQuery 3.1.1 in https://cleanline.ca/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/js/placeholders.jquery.min…: CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • FoundKeys and secrets in page codeMedium

    1 credential-like value found in code served to every visitor: Google API key.

    • Google API key AIzaSy…aA (39 chars) in https://cleanline.ca/: browser keys are expected in pages, but must be restricted by HTTP referrer and API in the Google Cloud console
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 3 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • cdn.trustindex.io (2 script tags)
    • cdn.callrail.com (40 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
7 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 314 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set on 96 of 314 pages.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 314 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    27 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near cleanline.ca

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling cleanline.ca from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own cleanline.ca?