Scanned sites / pointroof.com

SEO report for pointroof.com DR 10

The latest Site Spider scan of pointroof.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/pointroof-com/2026-09-11-1351.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-11 13:51:44 UTC, finished 2026-09-11 14:27:22 UTC

Site: https://pointroof.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

83/ 100Good

On September 11, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 250 pages and 1000 assets of pointroof.com, starting from https://pointroof.com/. It scored 83 out of 100, a good result. 9 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by sitemap coverage (152), title tags (88), links to other sites (22); 9 checks passed. Most of the points went to sitemap coverage (−3.7), title tags (−3.5), links to other sites (−3.5). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium and 2 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
250
Assets fetched
1000
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
9 of 27
CoverageJob finished, partial coverage

1,250 of 1,250 discovered URLs were fetched, 1,003 left out by the 5,000-page and 1,000-asset budget. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 300 link destinations on other sites were checked, 20 left unchecked.

  • Title tags88 issues
    88 of 152 pages have title issues. 96 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.5 points
  • Meta descriptions57 issues
    57 of 152 pages have meta description issues. 96 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1.8 points
  • Headings1 issue
    1 of 152 pages have heading issues. 96 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites22 issues
    22 destinations answered with an error, 191 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 20 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
    −3.5 points
  • Redirects2 issues
    3 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responses4 noted
    4 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 2 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability23 issues
    23 of 175 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 73 pages noindex by design.
    −0.9 points
  • Image alt text107 issues
    107 of 801 image references have no alt attribute. 649 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
    −0.8 points
  • Heavy assets4 issues
    4 assets larger than 500 KB among 1000 fetched assets.
    −2.4 points
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage152 issues
    1 sitemap listing 0 URLs: 152 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −3.7 points
  • Internal link counts201 noted
    Internal link counts for 248 pages; 201 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 152 pages have fewer than 200 words. 96 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format5 noted
    5 of 250 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals96 noted
    96 of 248 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives248 noted
    248 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text133 noted
    133 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure34 noted
    34 of 152 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 96 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length11 noted
    9 images over 100 KB; 2 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 248 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 12 response headers recorded across 1250 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 248 pages; 203 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 52 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2347 sites, median 79%, average 78%

pointroof.com scores 83%, higher than 64% of the 2347 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581150%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 7 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 8 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 36 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 69 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 70 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 107 sites79%: 85 sites80%: 107 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 103 sites84%: 107 sites85%: 88 sites86%: 70 sites87%: 73 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 66 sites90%: 35 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 17 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 12 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 5 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 68 sites83% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your website has a strong health score, but several improvements can enhance SEO performance. Focus on fixing redirect issues and optimizing titles and meta descriptions for better visibility.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Redirects can harm user experience and SEO.

    How: Update the URLs to remove unnecessary redirects, particularly the sitemap redirects.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: 404 errors can affect user access and SEO ranking.

    How: Identify and fix the 404 URL by replacing it with the correct link or removing it.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Optimizing Title Tags

    Why: Short and long titles may confuse users and search engines.

    How: Revise titles to stay within 30-60 characters, adding keywords for relevance.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: Meta descriptions impact click-through rates.

    How: Adjust meta descriptions to be between 50-160 characters and engaging.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Add Missing Headings

    Why: Missing headings can hinder content structure and SEO.

    How: Add an H1 tag to the page missing it, ensuring clear content hierarchy.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Update Sitemap Coverage

    Why: Improved sitemap coverage assists in better indexing.

    How: Ensure all crawled pages are included in the sitemap and resubmit it.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website pointroof.com has several security vulnerabilities that could expose users to risks, including interception of requests, clickjacking, and the execution of potentially malicious scripts. Immediate action is recommended to implement critical security headers.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 2 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, initial HTTP requests may be intercepted, risking user data.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Absence of CSP allows scripts and resources to load from untrusted sources, increasing XSS risks.

    Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; script-src 'self';

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without this header, the site is vulnerable to clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Lack of this header may allow browsers to incorrectly interpret file types, exposing security vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Third-Party Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from other domains lack integrity checks, posing a risk if those scripts are compromised.

    Fix: Consider implementing a CSP to manage script sources or validating third-party scripts with Subresource Integrity.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://pointroof.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://pointroof.com/about-us/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://pointroof.com/careers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://pointroof.com/financing/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://pointroof.com/warranty/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://pointroof.com/blog/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://pointroof.com/gallery/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://pointroof.com/referral/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://pointroof.com/faqs/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://pointroof.com/services/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://pointroof.com/services/roof-repair/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://pointroof.com/services/roof-replacement/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 248 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://pointroof.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://pointroof.com/about-us/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://pointroof.com/careers/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://pointroof.com/financing/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://pointroof.com/warranty/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://pointroof.com/blog/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://pointroof.com/gallery/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://pointroof.com/referral/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://pointroof.com/faqs/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://pointroof.com/services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://pointroof.com/services/roof-repair/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://pointroof.com/services/roof-replacement/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://pointroof.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://pointroof.com/about-us/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://pointroof.com/careers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://pointroof.com/financing/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://pointroof.com/warranty/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://pointroof.com/blog/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://pointroof.com/gallery/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://pointroof.com/referral/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://pointroof.com/faqs/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://pointroof.com/services/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://pointroof.com/services/roof-repair/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://pointroof.com/services/roof-replacement/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://pointroof.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://pointroof.com/about-us/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://pointroof.com/careers/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://pointroof.com/financing/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://pointroof.com/warranty/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://pointroof.com/blog/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://pointroof.com/gallery/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://pointroof.com/referral/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://pointroof.com/faqs/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://pointroof.com/services/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://pointroof.com/services/roof-repair/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://pointroof.com/services/roof-replacement/ → no x-content-type-options
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 5 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • www.google.com (37 script tags)
    • cdn.calltrk.com (1 script tag)
    • embed.scheduler.servicetitan.com (1 script tag)
    • static.elfsight.com (1 script tag)
8 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 248 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    37 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of pointroof.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near pointroof.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling pointroof.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own pointroof.com?