Scanned sites / riverstonewellness.ca

SEO report for riverstonewellness.ca DR 12

The latest Site Spider scan of riverstonewellness.ca, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/riverstonewellness-ca/2026-09-11-1546.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-11 15:46:53 UTC, finished 2026-09-11 15:49:31 UTC

Site: https://riverstonewellness.ca/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

83/ 100Good

On September 11, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 106 pages and 148 assets of riverstonewellness.ca, starting from https://riverstonewellness.ca/. It scored 83 out of 100, a good result. 8 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (12), meta descriptions (49), sitemap coverage (40); 11 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), meta descriptions (−4), sitemap coverage (−2.4). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium, 1 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
106
Assets fetched
148
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
8 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

254 of 254 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 122 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags21 issues
    21 of 80 pages have title issues. 18 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.1 points
  • Meta descriptions49 issues
    49 of 80 pages have meta description issues. 18 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4 points
  • Headings8 issues
    8 of 80 pages have heading issues. 18 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.5 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites3 issues
    3 destinations answered with an error, 52 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 122 destinations checked.
    −1.2 points
  • Redirects8 issues
    10 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.3 points
  • Non-200 responses12 noted
    12 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 8 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability5 issues
    5 of 84 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 14 pages noindex by design.
    −0.5 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 0 image references have no alt attribute.
  • Heavy assets12 issues
    12 assets larger than 500 KB among 148 fetched assets. 6 documents over that size are listed but not counted: downloads are not page weight.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage40 issues
    1 sitemap listing 40 URLs: 39 crawled pages missing, 1 listed URL broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −2.4 points
  • Internal link counts16 noted
    Internal link counts for 98 pages; 16 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 80 pages have fewer than 200 words. 18 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format5 noted
    5 of 106 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals18 noted
    18 of 98 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives98 noted
    98 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text3 noted
    3 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure22 noted
    22 of 80 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 18 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt lengthOK
    No image is over 100 KB or carries alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 98 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 11 response headers recorded across 254 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 98 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 76 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2347 sites, median 79%, average 78%

riverstonewellness.ca scores 83%, higher than 64% of the 2347 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581150%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 7 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 69 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 70 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 107 sites79%: 85 sites80%: 107 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 103 sites84%: 107 sites85%: 88 sites86%: 70 sites87%: 73 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 66 sites90%: 35 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 17 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 12 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 5 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 68 sites83% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site's health is good, but there are several SEO improvements needed. Focus on fixing redirects, 404 errors, and enhancing title tags and meta descriptions. Improving indexability and sitemap coverage will boost your site's visibility.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: 10 URLs redirect, causing potential traffic loss.

    How: Update or remove the redundant redirects to point directly to the final URL.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: 12 URLs return errors, impacting user experience and SEO.

    How: Identify these URLs and fix the issues causing the non-200 responses by either correcting links or removing them.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: 21 pages have long title tags affecting click-through rates.

    How: Revise titles to be under 60 characters and ensure they are concise and relevant.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: 32 pages have problematic meta descriptions, impacting search visibility.

    How: Rewrite meta descriptions to be unique, under 155 characters, and aligned with the content.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Correct Heading Issues

    Why: 8 pages are missing H1 tags, hindering SEO structure.

    How: Add relevant H1 tags to these pages to enhance their hierarchy and SEO.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Enhance Sitemap Coverage

    Why: Sitemap lists 1 URL incorrectly and misses 39 pages.

    How: Update the sitemap to include all crawled pages and ensure URLs are correctly formatted.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website has several important security headers missing, which could expose it to various risks. Implementing HTTP Strict Transport Security and Content Security Policies is crucial for protecting against potential attacks. Additionally, adding X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options will help secure your site further. Review your robots.txt for sensitive paths as well.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 1 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users typing the URL without https:// may be intercepted.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Absence of CSP allows unrestricted loading of scripts and other resources, increasing risk of attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    No Clickjacking ProtectionMedium

    Why it matters: Lack of X-Frame-Options allows your pages to be embedded in frames, risking clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Missing MIME Sniffing ProtectionLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers might misinterpret files, leading to potential script execution.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Sensitive Paths in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The public robots.txt file lists private paths which could guide attackers.

    Fix: Consider restricting access with proper authentication and not exposing sensitive paths.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://riverstonewellness.ca/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://riverstonewellness.ca/about/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://riverstonewellness.ca/about/meet-the-staff/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://riverstonewellness.ca/about/prices/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://riverstonewellness.ca/about/reviews/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://riverstonewellness.ca/blog/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://riverstonewellness.ca/about/direct-billing/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://riverstonewellness.ca/about/cancellation-policy/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://riverstonewellness.ca/about/download-forms/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://riverstonewellness.ca/services/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://riverstonewellness.ca/massage-therapy-edmonton/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://riverstonewellness.ca/massage-therapy-edmonton/matrix-repatterning/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 98 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://riverstonewellness.ca/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://riverstonewellness.ca/about/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://riverstonewellness.ca/about/meet-the-staff/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://riverstonewellness.ca/about/prices/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://riverstonewellness.ca/about/reviews/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://riverstonewellness.ca/blog/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://riverstonewellness.ca/about/direct-billing/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://riverstonewellness.ca/about/cancellation-policy/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://riverstonewellness.ca/about/download-forms/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://riverstonewellness.ca/services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://riverstonewellness.ca/massage-therapy-edmonton/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://riverstonewellness.ca/massage-therapy-edmonton/matrix-repatterning/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://riverstonewellness.ca/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://riverstonewellness.ca/about/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://riverstonewellness.ca/about/meet-the-staff/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://riverstonewellness.ca/about/prices/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://riverstonewellness.ca/about/reviews/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://riverstonewellness.ca/blog/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://riverstonewellness.ca/about/direct-billing/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://riverstonewellness.ca/about/cancellation-policy/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://riverstonewellness.ca/about/download-forms/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://riverstonewellness.ca/services/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://riverstonewellness.ca/massage-therapy-edmonton/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://riverstonewellness.ca/massage-therapy-edmonton/matrix-repatterning/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://riverstonewellness.ca/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://riverstonewellness.ca/about/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://riverstonewellness.ca/about/meet-the-staff/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://riverstonewellness.ca/about/prices/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://riverstonewellness.ca/about/reviews/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://riverstonewellness.ca/blog/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://riverstonewellness.ca/about/direct-billing/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://riverstonewellness.ca/about/cancellation-policy/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://riverstonewellness.ca/about/download-forms/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://riverstonewellness.ca/services/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://riverstonewellness.ca/massage-therapy-edmonton/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://riverstonewellness.ca/massage-therapy-edmonton/matrix-repatterning/ → no x-content-type-options
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 3 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /cgi-bin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-includes/
7 checks passed, 4 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 98 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKThird-party scripts

    The sampled pages load no scripts from other domains.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableForms over HTTPS

    No forms were found on the sampled pages.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of riverstonewellness.ca

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near riverstonewellness.ca

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling riverstonewellness.ca from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own riverstonewellness.ca?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming riverstonewellness.ca. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.