Scanned sites / bing.com

SEO report for bing.com DR 93

The latest Site Spider scan of bing.com, with 12 scans on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/bing-com/2026-10-17-0414.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-10-17 04:14:38 UTC, finished 2026-10-17 05:08:08 UTC. Found with 42backlinks.com tool directory

Not a full crawl. The site rate-limited the crawler (25 requests answered 429), so the scan finished early with 4335 URLs left unfetched. Results cover what was crawled.

Site: https://bing.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

79/ 100GoodNot a full crawl

On October 17, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 1643 pages and 22 assets of bing.com, starting from https://bing.com/. It scored 79 out of 100, a good result. 11 of 26 checks found something to fix, led by indexability (622), title tags (560), meta descriptions (609); 6 checks passed. Most of the points went to indexability (−4.2), title tags (−3.8), meta descriptions (−3.3). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 11 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: not available for this scan.

Pages crawled
1643
Assets fetched
22
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
11 of 26
CoverageJob finished, partial coverage

1,665 of 6,000 discovered URLs were fetched, 108,459 left out by the 5,000-page and 1,000-asset budget, 4,335 skipped when the crawl was cut short. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 300 link destinations on other sites were checked, 6968 left unchecked.

  • Title tags560 issues
    560 of 610 pages have title issues. 878 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.8 points
  • Meta descriptions609 issues
    609 of 610 pages have meta description issues. 878 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.3 points
  • Headings606 issues
    606 of 610 pages have heading issues. 878 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.4 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites19 issues
    19 destinations answered with an error, 68 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 6968 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
    −0.5 points
  • Redirects130 issues
    133 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.3 points
  • Non-200 responses133 noted
    133 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 131 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limited24 issues
    24 URLs (24 pages) answered HTTP 429 on every try, so the crawler backed off and moved on without analysing them. A site that throttles crawlers this hard can throttle search engines too.
    −0.1 points
  • Indexability622 issues
    622 of 762 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 726 pages noindex by design.
    −4.2 points
  • Image alt text12,461 issues
    12461 of 26658 image references have no alt attribute. 781 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
    −2.8 points
  • Heavy assetsOK
    0 assets larger than 500 KB among 22 fetched assets.
  • Orphan pages10 issues
    10 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage610 issues
    1 sitemap listing 0 URLs: 610 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −2.5 points
  • Internal link counts352 noted
    Internal link counts for 500 pages; 352 worth a look.
  • Thin content218 issues
    218 of 610 pages have fewer than 200 words. 878 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1.2 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format1,632 noted
    1632 of 1643 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals1,484 noted
    1484 of 1488 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives757 noted
    757 pages carry a robots directive; 731 carry none.
  • Anchor text1,127 noted
    1127 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure133 noted
    133 of 610 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 878 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length1,015 noted
    0 images over 100 KB; 1015 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 1488 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookies15 noted
    16 cookies set by the site, 15 missing a protective flag; 15 response headers recorded across 1665 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 1488 pages; 1447 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

What changed since the last scan

-2 points

bing.com lost 2 points since the previous scan, moving from 81 to 79 out of 100. 1,480 findings changed. The two crawls did not cover the same ground, so part of the difference is coverage rather than change. 1,110 URLs the earlier crawl reached were not reached this time. The crawl reached 121 fewer pages than last time, 1643 in total, so some of the change is a change in what was crawled. Across 12 scans on record it is up 8 points overall.

  • Pages: 866 new, 1 gone, 966 not re-checked
  • Page status codes: 118 new, 139 gone, 1 changed
  • Redirects: 106 new, 7 changed, 126 not re-checked
  • Titles: 16 changed
  • Internal links to the page: 225 changed
  • Crawl depth: 1 changed
  • 1110 URLs from the earlier crawl were not reached this time
  • Crawl coverage differed between the two scans; some differences may be coverage rather than change
  1. 2026-09-19 13:50:52 UTC70/1001,001 pages
  2. 2026-09-22 15:01:10 UTC69/100952 pages
  3. 2026-09-25 16:15:27 UTC68/100922 pages
  4. 2026-09-28 17:21:16 UTC70/100933 pages
  5. 2026-10-01 17:58:51 UTC78/1001,370 pages
  6. 2026-10-05 00:45:47 UTC75/1001,238 pages
  7. 2026-10-08 01:32:47 UTC70/1001,001 pages
  8. 2026-10-11 02:04:30 UTC82/1002,038 pages
  9. 2026-10-14 03:08:35 UTC81/1001,764 pages
  10. 2026-10-17 04:14:38 UTC79/1001,643 pages

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2284 sites, median 79%, average 78%

bing.com scores 79%, higher than 47% of the 2284 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0571140%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 0 sites10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 16 sites59%: 7 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 36 sites67%: 34 sites68%: 35 sites69%: 45 sites70%: 41 sites71%: 68 sites72%: 70 sites73%: 65 sites74%: 70 sites75%: 71 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 104 sites79%: 87 sites80%: 107 sites81%: 106 sites82%: 114 sites83%: 95 sites84%: 107 sites85%: 84 sites86%: 67 sites87%: 71 sites88%: 62 sites89%: 61 sites90%: 33 sites91%: 44 sites92%: 34 sites93%: 20 sites94%: 14 sites95%: 10 sites96%: 9 sites97%: 9 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 0 sites100%: 70 sites79% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Earlier scans of bing.com

Sites scoring near bing.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling bing.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own bing.com?