Scanned sites / bing.com / 2026-09-25-1615

bing.com scan from 9/25/2026, 4:15:27 PM

Scan 2026-09-25-1615

Scanned 9/25/2026, 4:15:27 PM, finished 9/25/2026, 5:20:22 PM. Found with 42backlinks.com tool directory

Not a full crawl. The site rate-limited the crawler (25 requests answered 429), so the scan finished early with 5026 URLs left unfetched. Results cover what was crawled.

Site: https://bing.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

68/ 100Needs workNot a full crawl

On September 25, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 922 pages and 52 assets of bing.com, starting from https://bing.com/. It scored 68 out of 100, a result that needs work. 10 of 14 checks found something to fix, led by image alt text (7518), indexability (500), sitemap coverage (491); 4 checks passed. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
922
Assets fetched
52
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
10 of 14
  • Title tags487 issues
    487 of 491 pages have title issues. 367 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Meta descriptions488 issues
    488 of 491 pages have meta description issues. 367 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Headings490 issues
    490 of 491 pages have heading issues. 367 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Redirects40 issues
    43 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responsesOK
    43 URLs did not return a 2xx response.
  • Rate limited23 issues
    23 URLs (23 pages) answered HTTP 429 on every try, so the crawler backed off and moved on without analysing them. A site that throttles crawlers this hard can throttle search engines too.
  • Indexability500 issues
    500 of 552 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 306 pages noindex by design.
  • Image alt text7518 issues
    7518 of 8370 image references have no alt attribute. 97 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assetsOK
    0 assets larger than 500 KB among the 52 heaviest.
  • Orphan pages13 issues
    13 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage491 issues
    1 sitemap listing 0 URLs: 491 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
  • Thin content323 issues
    323 of 491 pages have fewer than 200 words. 367 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

1265 sites, median 82%, average 80%

bing.com scores 68%, higher than 10% of the 1265 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

033660%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 0 sites10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 0 sites15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 1 site36%: 1 site37%: 0 sites38%: 0 sites39%: 0 sites40%: 0 sites41%: 0 sites42%: 0 sites43%: 0 sites44%: 0 sites45%: 2 sites46%: 2 sites47%: 1 site48%: 1 site49%: 0 sites50%: 3 sites51%: 4 sites52%: 4 sites53%: 4 sites54%: 4 sites55%: 2 sites56%: 2 sites57%: 3 sites58%: 8 sites59%: 4 sites60%: 7 sites61%: 9 sites62%: 12 sites63%: 4 sites64%: 9 sites65%: 10 sites66%: 11 sites67%: 16 sites68%: 29 sites69%: 14 sites70%: 26 sites71%: 25 sites72%: 29 sites73%: 28 sites74%: 33 sites75%: 29 sites76%: 41 sites77%: 42 sites78%: 39 sites79%: 38 sites80%: 51 sites81%: 57 sites82%: 56 sites83%: 53 sites84%: 60 sites85%: 53 sites86%: 51 sites87%: 57 sites88%: 61 sites89%: 44 sites90%: 66 sites91%: 40 sites92%: 25 sites93%: 21 sites94%: 18 sites95%: 10 sites96%: 11 sites97%: 4 sites98%: 3 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 23 sites68% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Your site has several critical issues affecting its SEO performance, including numerous title, meta description, and heading problems. High redirect and non-200 response counts are also notable. Addressing these issues will enhance user experience and search engine visibility.

  1. 1

    Fix 301 Redirects

    Why: 43 URLs redirect, reducing accessibility for crawlers and users.

    How: Review each redirect, maintaining only necessary ones and updating linked sources.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: 43 URLs failing to return a 2xx response can harm user experience.

    How: Identify faulty pages, either fixing issues or removing them.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Address Rate Limiting

    Why: 23 URLs are rate limited, hindering crawler analysis and search indexing.

    How: Optimize server configurations to allow crawlers better access.

    Checks: rate-limited

  4. 4

    Update Title Tags

    Why: 487 pages have title issues, affecting search ranking.

    How: Ensure every page has a unique, relevant title under 60 characters.

    Checks: titles

  5. 5

    Add Meta Descriptions

    Why: 488 pages miss meta descriptions, reducing click-through rates.

    How: Create unique, compelling meta descriptions for each page, under 160 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  6. 6

    Improve Headings Structure

    Why: 490 pages have heading issues, disrupting content hierarchy.

    How: Ensure each page has a proper H1 and appropriate subheadings.

    Checks: headings

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The security review for bing.com identified missing security headers and cookie flags that could expose users to risks such as interception and clickjacking. Immediate attention is needed to implement HTTP Strict Transport Security and X-Frame-Options across all pages, as well as to secure cookie attributes.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, a user typing the site manually may be intercepted on their first request.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing X-Frame-OptionsMedium

    Why it matters: Without this header, pages can be embedded in frames potentially leading to clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  3. 3

    Cookies Missing Security FlagsMedium

    Why it matters: Cookies without security flags can be accessed via scripts and used in cross-site requests, posing a significant risk.

    Fix: Set HttpOnly and Secure flags on cookies. For example: Set-Cookie: MUID=...; HttpOnly; Secure; SameSite=Strict.

    Evidence: Cookie flags

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-OptionsLow

    Why it matters: Absence of this header may allow browsers to interpret files in a potentially dangerous way.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Mixed Content IssuesLow

    Why it matters: Loading resources over HTTP on HTTPS pages can lead to security vulnerabilities and user trust issues.

    Fix: Change links to HTTPS, e.g., use https://www.bing.com/sa/simg/facebook_sharing_5.png.

    Evidence: Mixed content

  6. 6

    Missing Permissions-Policy HeaderInfo

    Why it matters: This header limits features that can be exploited by malicious scripts injected into the site.

    Fix: Add the header: Permissions-Policy: geolocation=(self), microphone=(), camera=().

    Evidence: Permissions policy

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    165 of 858 HTML pages send strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.bing.com/copilotsearch?q=&FORM=CSSCOP → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.bing.com/maps?q=&FORM=HDRSC4 → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.bing.com/news/search?q=&FORM=HDRSC6 → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.bing.com/images?FORM=HDRSC2 → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.bing.com/videos?FORM=HDRSC2 → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.bing.com/rebates/history?filters=blackjack&FORM=MG0AUG&ocid=MG0AUG&toWww=1&redig=A3CF002941EE4DF0B3E8C57C9C… → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.bing.com/rebates/faq?filters=blackjack&FORM=MG0AUG&ocid=MG0AUG&toWww=1&redig=4C083343687148C8A0768A726CD735… → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=98cd5f1fa5dd865e1c359fa556fb758f0207920bc253df439c771cc9cd030e3fJmltdHM9MTc5MDI5NDQwMA&p… → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.bing.com/copilotsearch?q=Bing+AI&FORM=CSSCOP → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=49d684c1f325b9132047bae28e34ee61e2a661664b26d6c8b66586b902e7411dJmltdHM9MTc5MDI5NDQwMA&p… → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=d5eaed1e86066686a116089888d4968076561496a5b2d6a9512d69bd657787ddJmltdHM9MTc5MDI5NDQwMA&p… → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=dc608666c2297089f6964124f8b0d1b24f7853601655eb7d26fc906e7ef99073JmltdHM9MTc5MDI5NDQwMA&p… → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    33 of 858 HTML pages send x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.bing.com/shop/deals/cashback → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.bing.com/shop/deals/cashback?setlang=fr&sid=186A8875E8BD6EBF2A8B9FAAE9C26F64 → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.bing.com/search?q=Bing+AI&FORM=HDRSC1 → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.bing.com/copilotsearch?q=&FORM=CSSCOP → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.bing.com/news/search?q=&FORM=HDRSC6 → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.bing.com/shop/deals/cashback?FORM=SHOPTB&entryPoint=msn → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.bing.com/shop/collections?collectionpage=true&FORM=SHOPTB&entryPoint=msn → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.bing.com/images?FORM=HDRSC2 → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.bing.com/videos?FORM=HDRSC2 → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.bing.com/shop/?FORM=SHOPTB → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.bing.com/shop/deals?FORM=SHOPTB&entryPoint=msn&ocid=SHOPTB → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.bing.com/rebates/history?filters=blackjack&FORM=MG0AUG&ocid=MG0AUG&toWww=1&redig=A3CF002941EE4DF0B3E8C57C9C… → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.bing.com/?toWww=1&redig=3BE3BC194355428392856AAC626C5729 → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.bing.com/shop/deals/cashback → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.bing.com/?FORM=Z9FD1 → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.bing.com/shop/deals/cashback?setlang=fr&sid=186A8875E8BD6EBF2A8B9FAAE9C26F64 → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.bing.com/search?q=Bing+AI&FORM=HDRSC1 → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.bing.com/copilotsearch?q=&FORM=CSSCOP → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.bing.com/maps?q=&FORM=HDRSC4 → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.bing.com/news/search?q=&FORM=HDRSC6 → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.bing.com/shop/deals/cashback?FORM=SHOPTB&entryPoint=msn → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.bing.com/shop/collections?collectionpage=true&FORM=SHOPTB&entryPoint=msn → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.bing.com/images?FORM=HDRSC2 → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.bing.com/videos?FORM=HDRSC2 → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    606 of 858 HTML pages send permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=98cd5f1fa5dd865e1c359fa556fb758f0207920bc253df439c771cc9cd030e3fJmltdHM9MTc5MDI5NDQwMA&p… → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=49d684c1f325b9132047bae28e34ee61e2a661664b26d6c8b66586b902e7411dJmltdHM9MTc5MDI5NDQwMA&p… → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=d5eaed1e86066686a116089888d4968076561496a5b2d6a9512d69bd657787ddJmltdHM9MTc5MDI5NDQwMA&p… → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=dc608666c2297089f6964124f8b0d1b24f7853601655eb7d26fc906e7ef99073JmltdHM9MTc5MDI5NDQwMA&p… → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=7d5df0691bb2cf30e2b0eb47364b05ad3e22cfee1d19c465efeb9fadafc30920JmltdHM9MTc5MDI5NDQwMA&p… → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=18cfcce5717362effa48f36d12ee13bd8d2486b34dbe01f4cfc3bc6035994516JmltdHM9MTc5MDI5NDQwMA&p… → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=79def07700bd84c2ffcfcc042acced31e33f0014be24606ccc501f65e86e9cb5JmltdHM9MTc5MDI5NDQwMA&p… → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=5f919ed9371e11c98f5e26848b561ada967d1a1c0df126e9ff5dbf3875bc492fJmltdHM9MTc5MDI5NDQwMA&p… → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=25dcd21b07a67cf0983c3f9aaa0efef25252e610d269b04e887470ae33dde5eaJmltdHM9MTc5MDI5NDQwMA&p… → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=98cba8a92c7bb16a09ebcd3c22fa2a3f3e8956ee56e1db9bc09ebbe5b1eb2d97JmltdHM9MTc5MDI5NDQwMA&p… → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=d3ca0ce377c12dcb23f3439f7ac060a7683e690de96d109cb787b44fdedbc997JmltdHM9MTc5MDI5NDQwMA&p… → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=38cc7500b0a6e4e4c46f88e2da37ecf1757e7bbf341b02e5777c6f73442b2f4dJmltdHM9MTc5MDI5NDQwMA&p… → no permissions-policy
  • FoundCookie flagsMedium

    14 of 15 cookies are missing protective flags. Without HttpOnly a script can read the cookie; without Secure it travels over plain HTTP; without SameSite it is sent on cross-site requests.

    • MUID (set by https://bing.com/) lacks HttpOnly
    • MUIDB (set by https://bing.com/) lacks Secure, SameSite
    • _EDGE_S (set by https://bing.com/) lacks Secure, SameSite
    • _EDGE_V (set by https://bing.com/) lacks Secure, SameSite
    • SRCHD (set by https://www.bing.com/?toWww=1&redig=3BE3BC194355428392856AAC626C5729) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • SRCHUID (set by https://www.bing.com/?toWww=1&redig=3BE3BC194355428392856AAC626C5729) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • SRCHUSR (set by https://www.bing.com/?toWww=1&redig=3BE3BC194355428392856AAC626C5729) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • SRCHHPGUSR (set by https://www.bing.com/?toWww=1&redig=3BE3BC194355428392856AAC626C5729) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • _SS (set by https://www.bing.com/?toWww=1&redig=3BE3BC194355428392856AAC626C5729) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • ULC (set by https://www.bing.com/?toWww=1&redig=3BE3BC194355428392856AAC626C5729) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • _HPVN (set by https://www.bing.com/?toWww=1&redig=3BE3BC194355428392856AAC626C5729) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • MMCASM (set by https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=&FORM=HDRSC2) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
  • FoundMixed contentLow

    197 resources on HTTPS pages are loaded over plain HTTP.

    • https://www.bing.com/search?q=Bing+AI&FORM=HDRSC1 loads image http://www.bing.com/sa/simg/facebook_sharing_5.png
    • https://www.bing.com/images?FORM=HDRSC2 loads image http://www.bing.com/sa/simg/facebook_sharing_5.png
    • https://www.bing.com/search?q=IA+Bing&FORM=HDRSC1 loads image http://www.bing.com/sa/simg/facebook_sharing_5.png
    • https://www.bing.com/search?q=Bing+AI&FORM=HDRSC1&setlang=fr&sid=1BFD… loads image http://www.bing.com/sa/simg/facebook_sharing_5.png
    • https://www.bing.com/search?q=Bing+AI&FPIG=F450F7D784A044F3B5F66C604C… loads image http://www.bing.com/sa/simg/facebook_sharing_5.png
    • https://www.bing.com/search?q=Bing+AI&FPIG=F450F7D784A044F3B5F66C604C… loads image http://www.bing.com/sa/simg/facebook_sharing_5.png
    • https://www.bing.com/search?q=Bing+AI&FPIG=F450F7D784A044F3B5F66C604C… loads image http://www.bing.com/sa/simg/facebook_sharing_5.png
    • https://www.bing.com/search?q=Bing+AI&FORM=000017&qpvt=Bing+AI loads image http://www.bing.com/sa/simg/facebook_sharing_5.png
    • https://www.bing.com/search?q=Bing+AI&filters=ex1%3a%22ez1%22&FORM=00… loads image http://www.bing.com/sa/simg/facebook_sharing_5.png
    • https://www.bing.com/search?q=Bing+AI&filters=ex1%3a%22ez2%22&FORM=00… loads image http://www.bing.com/sa/simg/facebook_sharing_5.png
    • https://www.bing.com/search?q=Bing+AI&filters=ex1%3a%22ez3%22&FORM=00… loads image http://www.bing.com/sa/simg/facebook_sharing_5.png
    • https://www.bing.com/search?q=Bing+AI&filters=ex1%3a%22ez5_20356_2072… loads image http://www.bing.com/sa/simg/facebook_sharing_5.png
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • r.bing.com (86 script tags)
8 checks passed, 1 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 858 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set on 606 of 858 pages.

  • OKReferrer policy

    A referrer policy is set through a <meta name="referrer"> tag.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    No Server or X-Powered-By header is sent.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    16 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    No recognisable library versions were found in the sampled scripts.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near bing.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling bing.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own bing.com?

bing.com scan 2026-09-25-1615 | DIY SEO Hub