Scanned sites / bing.com / 2026-09-22-1501

bing.com scan from 9/22/2026, 3:01:10 PM

Scan 2026-09-22-1501

Scanned 9/22/2026, 3:01:10 PM, finished 9/22/2026, 4:14:20 PM. Found with 42backlinks.com tool directory

Not a full crawl. The site rate-limited the crawler (25 requests answered 429), so the scan finished early with 4996 URLs left unfetched. Results cover what was crawled.

Site: https://bing.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

69/ 100Needs workNot a full crawl

On September 22, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 952 pages and 52 assets of bing.com, starting from https://bing.com/. It scored 69 out of 100, a result that needs work. 10 of 14 checks found something to fix, led by image alt text (8533), indexability (503), sitemap coverage (478); 4 checks passed. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium, 3 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
952
Assets fetched
52
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
10 of 14
  • Title tags475 issues
    475 of 478 pages have title issues. 384 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Meta descriptions475 issues
    475 of 478 pages have meta description issues. 384 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Headings475 issues
    475 of 478 pages have heading issues. 384 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Redirects65 issues
    68 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responsesOK
    68 URLs did not return a 2xx response.
  • Rate limited24 issues
    24 URLs (24 pages) answered HTTP 429 on every try, so the crawler backed off and moved on without analysing them. A site that throttles crawlers this hard can throttle search engines too.
  • Indexability503 issues
    503 of 556 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 306 pages noindex by design.
  • Image alt text8533 issues
    8533 of 9965 image references have no alt attribute. 96 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assetsOK
    0 assets larger than 500 KB among the 52 heaviest.
  • Orphan pages14 issues
    14 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage478 issues
    1 sitemap listing 0 URLs: 478 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
  • Thin content315 issues
    315 of 478 pages have fewer than 200 words. 384 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

1176 sites, median 82%, average 80%

bing.com scores 69%, higher than 12% of the 1176 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

030590%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 0 sites10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 0 sites15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 1 site36%: 1 site37%: 0 sites38%: 0 sites39%: 0 sites40%: 0 sites41%: 0 sites42%: 0 sites43%: 0 sites44%: 0 sites45%: 2 sites46%: 1 site47%: 1 site48%: 1 site49%: 0 sites50%: 3 sites51%: 4 sites52%: 2 sites53%: 1 site54%: 3 sites55%: 1 site56%: 2 sites57%: 3 sites58%: 7 sites59%: 3 sites60%: 6 sites61%: 9 sites62%: 12 sites63%: 4 sites64%: 9 sites65%: 10 sites66%: 9 sites67%: 15 sites68%: 28 sites69%: 15 sites70%: 26 sites71%: 24 sites72%: 25 sites73%: 27 sites74%: 33 sites75%: 27 sites76%: 40 sites77%: 41 sites78%: 35 sites79%: 35 sites80%: 49 sites81%: 56 sites82%: 53 sites83%: 48 sites84%: 59 sites85%: 51 sites86%: 47 sites87%: 51 sites88%: 57 sites89%: 39 sites90%: 57 sites91%: 39 sites92%: 24 sites93%: 19 sites94%: 14 sites95%: 9 sites96%: 11 sites97%: 4 sites98%: 3 sites99%: 1 site100%: 17 sites69% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Your website has significant issues requiring attention, including numerous redirects, non-200 responses, and missing meta tags and headings. Addressing these can improve SEO performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: 68 URLs are redirecting, affecting user experience and crawl efficiency.

    How: Identify and update links to point directly to the final destination URLs, avoiding unnecessary redirects.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: 68 URLs are not returning 2xx responses, potentially leading to user frustration or missed content.

    How: Check the non-200 URLs and correct their configuration issues, ensuring they return a valid response.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Address Rate Limiting

    Why: 24 URLs are rate-limited, hindering search engine crawlers from accessing them.

    How: Review server configurations to allow adequate access for crawlers, or adjust rate-limits accordingly.

    Checks: rate-limited

  4. 4

    Implement Title Tags

    Why: 475 pages have title issues, which can impact search rankings and click-through rates.

    How: Create unique, descriptive title tags for affected pages, ensuring they are under 60 characters.

    Checks: titles

  5. 5

    Add Meta Descriptions

    Why: 475 pages lack proper meta descriptions, essential for search appearance.

    How: Write concise meta descriptions for each page, keeping them under 160 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  6. 6

    Fix Headings Structure

    Why: 475 pages have heading issues, which can confuse users and search engines.

    How: Assign appropriate H1 tags to each page and structure subsequent headings logically.

    Checks: headings

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The security assessment of Bing identified concerns primarily around transport security and clickjacking protections. Recommendations include enabling HTTP Strict Transport Security and adding X-Frame-Options headers. Additionally, cookie flags and permissions policies require attention to enhance overall site security.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 3 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, initial requests can be vulnerable to interception.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    No X-Frame-Options to Prevent ClickjackingMedium

    Why it matters: Lack of this header exposes the site to clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY or use a CSP frame-ancestors directive.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  3. 3

    Missing Cookie FlagsMedium

    Why it matters: Cookies without proper flags can be vulnerable to attacks.

    Fix: Set HttpOnly on 'MUID', Secure and SameSite on all cookies.

    Evidence: Cookie flags

  4. 4

    Missing MIME Sniffing ProtectionLow

    Why it matters: Lack of this header may allow external scripts to execute improperly.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Mixed Content IssuesLow

    Why it matters: Loading resources over HTTP on HTTPS pages can lead to security warnings.

    Fix: Change resource URLs to HTTPS to resolve mixed content.

    Evidence: Mixed content

  6. 6

    Third-Party Scripts without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from other domains could introduce vulnerabilities if compromised.

    Fix: Implement Content Security Policy to limit third-party resources.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  7. 7

    Lack of Permissions PolicyInfo

    Why it matters: Not restricting browser features increases risk if scripts are compromised.

    Fix: Add the header: Permissions-Policy: fullscreen=(self), geolocation=()

    Evidence: Permissions policy

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    179 of 862 HTML pages send strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.bing.com/copilotsearch?q=&FORM=CSSCOP → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.bing.com/maps?q=&FORM=HDRSC4 → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.bing.com/news/search?q=&FORM=HDRSC6 → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.bing.com/images?FORM=HDRSC2 → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.bing.com/videos?FORM=HDRSC2 → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.bing.com/rebates/history?filters=blackjack&FORM=MG0AUG&ocid=MG0AUG&toWww=1&redig=50BB5282DBF8462BAAD1A93D37… → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.bing.com/rebates/faq?filters=blackjack&FORM=MG0AUG&ocid=MG0AUG&toWww=1&redig=B0BB3BE213644643BC96BE53EA1B9A… → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=2c23a7f19a11af3ddaabd87ed0a7899ff985b9f442d135010f11d594e5f81bdeJmltdHM9MTc5MDAzNTIwMA&p… → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.bing.com/copilotsearch?q=Bing+AI&FORM=CSSCOP → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=4787afb80e1ebfd60f209ca40ff4a3cc06bfb0ed30f3f586046c20368a768645JmltdHM9MTc5MDAzNTIwMA&p… → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=4be4649de2348d02e5697f59a126a353c82961bba5cebc9468a52a321b076e3cJmltdHM9MTc5MDAzNTIwMA&p… → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=56643b4366c8edf041f853c76c3ec7b4df27519f084fecbed7da82052c2949a0JmltdHM9MTc5MDAzNTIwMA&p… → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    35 of 862 HTML pages send x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.bing.com/shop/deals/cashback → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.bing.com/shop/deals/cashback?setlang=fr&sid=209C9E9E0B77626108A989420AB66331 → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.bing.com/search?q=Bing+AI&FORM=HDRSC1 → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.bing.com/copilotsearch?q=&FORM=CSSCOP → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.bing.com/news/search?q=&FORM=HDRSC6 → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.bing.com/shop/deals/cashback?FORM=SHOPTB&entryPoint=msn → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.bing.com/shop/collections?collectionpage=true&FORM=SHOPTB&entryPoint=msn → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.bing.com/images?FORM=HDRSC2 → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.bing.com/videos?FORM=HDRSC2 → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.bing.com/shop/?FORM=SHOPTB → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.bing.com/shop/deals?FORM=SHOPTB&entryPoint=msn&ocid=SHOPTB → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.bing.com/rebates/history?filters=blackjack&FORM=MG0AUG&ocid=MG0AUG&toWww=1&redig=50BB5282DBF8462BAAD1A93D37… → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.bing.com/?toWww=1&redig=8B50EA78C0A44849884AE86E0CBE329A → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.bing.com/shop/deals/cashback → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.bing.com/?FORM=Z9FD1 → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.bing.com/shop/deals/cashback?setlang=fr&sid=209C9E9E0B77626108A989420AB66331 → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.bing.com/search?q=Bing+AI&FORM=HDRSC1 → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.bing.com/copilotsearch?q=&FORM=CSSCOP → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.bing.com/maps?q=&FORM=HDRSC4 → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.bing.com/news/search?q=&FORM=HDRSC6 → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.bing.com/shop/deals/cashback?FORM=SHOPTB&entryPoint=msn → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.bing.com/shop/collections?collectionpage=true&FORM=SHOPTB&entryPoint=msn → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.bing.com/images?FORM=HDRSC2 → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.bing.com/videos?FORM=HDRSC2 → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    621 of 862 HTML pages send permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=2c23a7f19a11af3ddaabd87ed0a7899ff985b9f442d135010f11d594e5f81bdeJmltdHM9MTc5MDAzNTIwMA&p… → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=4787afb80e1ebfd60f209ca40ff4a3cc06bfb0ed30f3f586046c20368a768645JmltdHM9MTc5MDAzNTIwMA&p… → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=4be4649de2348d02e5697f59a126a353c82961bba5cebc9468a52a321b076e3cJmltdHM9MTc5MDAzNTIwMA&p… → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=56643b4366c8edf041f853c76c3ec7b4df27519f084fecbed7da82052c2949a0JmltdHM9MTc5MDAzNTIwMA&p… → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=055adea71fd1b7f18cef781e0918e92f05192ad5c8cd92bdd0d25c052270d89cJmltdHM9MTc5MDAzNTIwMA&p… → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=8da9ef0eee24e6cfad62593baf29565e22c6f02e50831f7f71583fe7aa9007f8JmltdHM9MTc5MDAzNTIwMA&p… → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=608a94ea2e96b8031796513fd1ade6957e607a81a38d9e9de63cebb339bc5aa5JmltdHM9MTc5MDAzNTIwMA&p… → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=bda8b958844b021f6cc07f32f172abe45faae3cadbc188be8013804ab93b3584JmltdHM9MTc5MDAzNTIwMA&p… → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=d07374f60d4c17ae71c9e03ce691ce9b1122888ec72bd84f4831e762e96ac868JmltdHM9MTc5MDAzNTIwMA&p… → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=0492cd03100d03fbd5640a81df663f69e790ba0969a79c7a20d2aff416ff0554JmltdHM9MTc5MDAzNTIwMA&p… → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=db14fb1e5343bb1ff9face58b776878173b85a7d009177c49cf0b257c9d84090JmltdHM9MTc5MDAzNTIwMA&p… → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=8329595ed6d86299bfe35f1315a8ca8d1b36e71085be59ee62702e8da70cebf9JmltdHM9MTc5MDAzNTIwMA&p… → no permissions-policy
  • FoundCookie flagsMedium

    14 of 15 cookies are missing protective flags. Without HttpOnly a script can read the cookie; without Secure it travels over plain HTTP; without SameSite it is sent on cross-site requests.

    • MUID (set by https://bing.com/) lacks HttpOnly
    • MUIDB (set by https://bing.com/) lacks Secure, SameSite
    • _EDGE_S (set by https://bing.com/) lacks Secure, SameSite
    • _EDGE_V (set by https://bing.com/) lacks Secure, SameSite
    • SRCHD (set by https://www.bing.com/?toWww=1&redig=8B50EA78C0A44849884AE86E0CBE329A) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • SRCHUID (set by https://www.bing.com/?toWww=1&redig=8B50EA78C0A44849884AE86E0CBE329A) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • SRCHUSR (set by https://www.bing.com/?toWww=1&redig=8B50EA78C0A44849884AE86E0CBE329A) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • SRCHHPGUSR (set by https://www.bing.com/?toWww=1&redig=8B50EA78C0A44849884AE86E0CBE329A) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • _SS (set by https://www.bing.com/?toWww=1&redig=8B50EA78C0A44849884AE86E0CBE329A) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • ULC (set by https://www.bing.com/?toWww=1&redig=8B50EA78C0A44849884AE86E0CBE329A) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • _HPVN (set by https://www.bing.com/?toWww=1&redig=8B50EA78C0A44849884AE86E0CBE329A) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • MMCASM (set by https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=&FORM=HDRSC2) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
  • FoundMixed contentLow

    192 resources on HTTPS pages are loaded over plain HTTP.

    • https://www.bing.com/search?q=Bing+AI&FORM=HDRSC1 loads image http://www.bing.com/sa/simg/facebook_sharing_5.png
    • https://www.bing.com/images?FORM=HDRSC2 loads image http://www.bing.com/sa/simg/facebook_sharing_5.png
    • https://www.bing.com/search?q=IA+Bing&FORM=HDRSC1 loads image http://www.bing.com/sa/simg/facebook_sharing_5.png
    • https://www.bing.com/search?q=Bing+AI&FORM=HDRSC1&setlang=fr&sid=1F5A… loads image http://www.bing.com/sa/simg/facebook_sharing_5.png
    • https://www.bing.com/search?q=Bing+AI&FPIG=EADF2A2394A84191A1C75B475B… loads image http://www.bing.com/sa/simg/facebook_sharing_5.png
    • https://www.bing.com/search?q=Bing+AI&FPIG=EADF2A2394A84191A1C75B475B… loads image http://www.bing.com/sa/simg/facebook_sharing_5.png
    • https://www.bing.com/search?q=Bing+AI&FPIG=EADF2A2394A84191A1C75B475B… loads image http://www.bing.com/sa/simg/facebook_sharing_5.png
    • https://www.bing.com/search?q=Bing+AI&FORM=000017&qpvt=Bing+AI loads image http://www.bing.com/sa/simg/facebook_sharing_5.png
    • https://www.bing.com/search?q=Bing+AI&filters=ex1%3a%22ez1%22&FORM=00… loads image http://www.bing.com/sa/simg/facebook_sharing_5.png
    • https://www.bing.com/search?q=Bing+AI&filters=ex1%3a%22ez2%22&FORM=00… loads image http://www.bing.com/sa/simg/facebook_sharing_5.png
    • https://www.bing.com/search?q=Bing+AI&filters=ex1%3a%22ez3%22&FORM=00… loads image http://www.bing.com/sa/simg/facebook_sharing_5.png
    • https://www.bing.com/search?q=Bing+AI&filters=ex1%3a%22ez5_20353_2071… loads image http://www.bing.com/sa/simg/facebook_sharing_5.png
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • r.bing.com (91 script tags)
8 checks passed, 1 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 862 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set on 621 of 862 pages.

  • OKReferrer policy

    A referrer policy is set through a <meta name="referrer"> tag.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    No Server or X-Powered-By header is sent.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    17 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    No recognisable library versions were found in the sampled scripts.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near bing.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling bing.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own bing.com?

bing.com scan 2026-09-22-1501 | DIY SEO Hub