Scanned sites / bing.com / 2026-10-01-1758

bing.com scan from 10/1/2026, 5:58:51 PM

Scan 2026-10-01-1758

Scanned 10/1/2026, 5:58:51 PM, finished 10/2/2026, 12:44:05 AM. Found with 42backlinks.com tool directory

Not a full crawl. The site rate-limited the crawler (25 requests answered 429), so the scan finished early with 4578 URLs left unfetched. Results cover what was crawled.

Site: https://bing.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

78/ 100GoodNot a full crawl

On October 1, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 1370 pages and 52 assets of bing.com, starting from https://bing.com/. It scored 78 out of 100, a good result. 11 of 16 checks found something to fix, led by image alt text (19,087), indexability (485), title tags (453); 3 checks passed. Most of the points went to image alt text (−5.5), indexability (−3.7), title tags (−3.5). 2 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
1370
Assets fetched
52
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
11 of 16
CoverageJob finished, partial coverage

1,422 of 6,000 discovered URLs were fetched, 53,183 left out by the 5,000-page and 1,000-asset budget, 4,578 skipped when the crawl was cut short. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 300 link destinations on other sites were checked, 2837 left unchecked.

  • Title tags453 issues
    453 of 457 pages have title issues. 851 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.5 points
  • Meta descriptions455 issues
    455 of 457 pages have meta description issues. 851 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.8 points
  • Headings444 issues
    444 of 457 pages have heading issues. 851 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites3 issues
    3 destinations answered with an error, 64 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 2837 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
    −0.1 points
  • Redirects37 issues
    40 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.1 points
  • Non-200 responses40 noted
    40 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 38 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limited24 issues
    24 URLs (24 pages) answered HTTP 429 on every try, so the crawler backed off and moved on without analysing them. A site that throttles crawlers this hard can throttle search engines too.
    −0.1 points
  • Indexability485 issues
    485 of 536 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 772 pages noindex by design.
    −3.7 points
  • Image alt text19,087 issues
    19087 of 20652 image references have no alt attribute. 100 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
    −5.5 points
  • Heavy assetsOK
    0 assets larger than 500 KB among 52 fetched assets.
  • Orphan pages12 issues
    12 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage457 issues
    1 sitemap listing 0 URLs: 457 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −2.1 points
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 500 pages.
  • Thin content318 issues
    318 of 457 pages have fewer than 200 words. 851 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1.9 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

1669 sites, median 80%, average 79%

bing.com scores 78%, higher than 39% of the 1669 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0511010%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 0 sites10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 0 sites15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 2 sites38%: 2 sites39%: 0 sites40%: 2 sites41%: 0 sites42%: 0 sites43%: 1 site44%: 0 sites45%: 3 sites46%: 2 sites47%: 3 sites48%: 2 sites49%: 5 sites50%: 3 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 7 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 6 sites55%: 4 sites56%: 5 sites57%: 6 sites58%: 11 sites59%: 6 sites60%: 9 sites61%: 11 sites62%: 15 sites63%: 15 sites64%: 10 sites65%: 18 sites66%: 19 sites67%: 31 sites68%: 26 sites69%: 24 sites70%: 36 sites71%: 37 sites72%: 48 sites73%: 44 sites74%: 46 sites75%: 54 sites76%: 66 sites77%: 60 sites78%: 77 sites79%: 61 sites80%: 81 sites81%: 101 sites82%: 80 sites83%: 77 sites84%: 73 sites85%: 57 sites86%: 59 sites87%: 53 sites88%: 56 sites89%: 49 sites90%: 32 sites91%: 34 sites92%: 22 sites93%: 11 sites94%: 13 sites95%: 7 sites96%: 6 sites97%: 7 sites98%: 2 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 54 sites78% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Several issues need addressing, particularly with indexability, titles, and meta descriptions. Prioritize fixing the sitemap for better site structure.

  1. 1

    Resolve Sitemap Coverage

    Why: 457 pages are not listed in the sitemap, reducing their discoverability.

    How: Update the sitemap to include all relevant URLs, ensuring completeness and correctness.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

  2. 2

    Fix Indexability Issues

    Why: A significant number of pages (485) have indexability warnings, potentially impacting visibility.

    How: Verify affected pages and ensure they have canonical and viewport meta tags as necessary.

    Checks: indexability

  3. 3

    Add Title Tags

    Why: 453 pages (99%) have title issues, which affects search engine ranking.

    How: Create unique title tags for all affected pages based on their content.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Write Meta Descriptions

    Why: 455 pages (99%) lack meta descriptions, which impacts click-through rates.

    How: Draft unique meta descriptions for each affected page, summarizing their content concisely.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Add Headings (H1)

    Why: 444 pages lack H1 headings, crucial for SEO and user navigation.

    How: Add relevant H1 headings to each affected page that accurately reflect their content.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Address Rate Limiting

    Why: 24 pages are rate-limited, preventing proper crawling.

    How: Adjust your server settings to allow a reasonable number of requests from crawlers.

    Checks: rate-limited

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The security review of Bing.com reveals several vulnerabilities related to HTTP headers and cookie protections. Key issues include the absence of HTTP Strict Transport Security and clickjacking protections, alongside missing cookie flags on critical cookies. Addressing these issues will enhance the site's resilience against attacks.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, visitors can be intercepted when accessing the site without HTTPS.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Clickjacking ProtectionMedium

    Why it matters: Without X-Frame-Options, the site can be embedded in malicious frames.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  3. 3

    Lacking Cookie FlagsMedium

    Why it matters: Missing flags like HttpOnly and Secure on cookies can expose them to theft or misuse.

    Fix: Set HttpOnly and Secure flags for MUID and others. Example: Set-Cookie: MUID=<value>; HttpOnly; Secure; SameSite=Lax

    Evidence: Cookie flags

  4. 4

    No MIME Sniffing ProtectionLow

    Why it matters: Absence of X-Content-Type-Options may allow browsers to improperly interpret content.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Mixed Content on HTTPS PagesLow

    Why it matters: Resources loaded over HTTP can compromise security on HTTPS pages.

    Fix: Ensure all resources are loaded over HTTPS.

    Evidence: Mixed content

  6. 6

    Missing Permissions PolicyInfo

    Why it matters: Without a permissions policy, unauthorized features could be accessed by injected scripts.

    Fix: Add the header: Permissions-Policy: camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=()

    Evidence: Permissions policy

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    163 of 1308 HTML pages send strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.bing.com/copilotsearch?q=&FORM=CSSCOP → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.bing.com/maps?q=&FORM=HDRSC4 → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.bing.com/news/search?q=&FORM=HDRSC6 → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.bing.com/images?FORM=HDRSC2 → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.bing.com/videos?FORM=HDRSC2 → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.bing.com/rebates/history?filters=blackjack&FORM=MG0AUG&ocid=MG0AUG&toWww=1&redig=8A56B086DD004B94B9888585FD… → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.bing.com/rebates/faq?filters=blackjack&FORM=MG0AUG&ocid=MG0AUG&toWww=1&redig=92ABFA22101F4EAFBA54904F74FD9C… → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.bing.com/copilotsearch?q=Bing+AI&FORM=CSSCOP → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=9b8eb8c226044b409e3755b6ddf9de1e7a890bbae5bb5fdd6349b751e1b6b797JmltdHM9MTc5MDgxMjgwMA&p… → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=aa9b18d58edfa0eda981f16fb8a59ab8531f96b37ce390fa5b37e9a57b9ae4f4JmltdHM9MTc5MDgxMjgwMA&p… → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=6b34627a11c3121a6ca4c102a9055dda578cda0ec6dfe14143e1688a0e5f9561JmltdHM9MTc5MDgxMjgwMA&p… → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=b5882f56973c1e0fe6806fbb987ce10fc20138a0334a8a9267e4d62b8683f3f2JmltdHM9MTc5MDgxMjgwMA&p… → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    32 of 1308 HTML pages send x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.bing.com/shop/deals/cashback → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.bing.com/shop/deals/cashback?setlang=fr&sid=2751409253C265D81866577752036409 → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.bing.com/search?q=Bing+AI&FORM=HDRSC1 → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.bing.com/copilotsearch?q=&FORM=CSSCOP → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.bing.com/news/search?q=&FORM=HDRSC6 → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.bing.com/shop/deals/cashback?FORM=SHOPTB&entryPoint=msn → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.bing.com/shop/collections?collectionpage=true&FORM=SHOPTB&entryPoint=msn → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.bing.com/images?FORM=HDRSC2 → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.bing.com/videos?FORM=HDRSC2 → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.bing.com/shop/?FORM=SHOPTB → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.bing.com/shop/deals?FORM=SHOPTB&entryPoint=msn&ocid=SHOPTB → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.bing.com/rebates/history?filters=blackjack&FORM=MG0AUG&ocid=MG0AUG&toWww=1&redig=8A56B086DD004B94B9888585FD… → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.bing.com/?toWww=1&redig=1EC4884BDC664647A36713FF43CEE6C0 → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.bing.com/shop/deals/cashback → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.bing.com/?FORM=Z9FD1 → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.bing.com/shop/deals/cashback?setlang=fr&sid=2751409253C265D81866577752036409 → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.bing.com/search?q=Bing+AI&FORM=HDRSC1 → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.bing.com/copilotsearch?q=&FORM=CSSCOP → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.bing.com/maps?q=&FORM=HDRSC4 → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.bing.com/news/search?q=&FORM=HDRSC6 → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.bing.com/shop/deals/cashback?FORM=SHOPTB&entryPoint=msn → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.bing.com/shop/collections?collectionpage=true&FORM=SHOPTB&entryPoint=msn → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.bing.com/images?FORM=HDRSC2 → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.bing.com/videos?FORM=HDRSC2 → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    1074 of 1308 HTML pages send permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=9b8eb8c226044b409e3755b6ddf9de1e7a890bbae5bb5fdd6349b751e1b6b797JmltdHM9MTc5MDgxMjgwMA&p… → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=aa9b18d58edfa0eda981f16fb8a59ab8531f96b37ce390fa5b37e9a57b9ae4f4JmltdHM9MTc5MDgxMjgwMA&p… → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=6b34627a11c3121a6ca4c102a9055dda578cda0ec6dfe14143e1688a0e5f9561JmltdHM9MTc5MDgxMjgwMA&p… → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=b5882f56973c1e0fe6806fbb987ce10fc20138a0334a8a9267e4d62b8683f3f2JmltdHM9MTc5MDgxMjgwMA&p… → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=c824938200a4679f309b6dc60db647dcf4047c0cab7dab2821ec5db3d77feaeeJmltdHM9MTc5MDgxMjgwMA&p… → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=c46c878523cf09d40857157ee6dfe8a95df0ec9ab1ed2eacb2f9ae593e111494JmltdHM9MTc5MDgxMjgwMA&p… → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=5abf9218152bd1ce89b3d4b4b899b1fee170ea3d8b9f8e2ffbddfdd4d13880f1JmltdHM9MTc5MDgxMjgwMA&p… → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=a8f3d32da4f098e067c0af8b9436fd4b588cfed1ff68dd832af5a4c88d9ebc5eJmltdHM9MTc5MDgxMjgwMA&p… → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=39e67237afef8400422252b3dc3014bedc4c7ae0c169cf9601827ef5e68573a9JmltdHM9MTc5MDgxMjgwMA&p… → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=928b14a9d946c1b05a2903186aef8542758441d78600db9bfdd691ff2a0d898dJmltdHM9MTc5MDgxMjgwMA&p… → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=a2e9115e3a21131007eebd7f0cd6c357ab67ebb9df73e6c718f03fbb80e3b76dJmltdHM9MTc5MDgxMjgwMA&p… → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=1e6f037e3fec2af4317d768c7be25c5d5472d384bbf9cb9fa91ba954b8106cf4JmltdHM9MTc5MDgxMjgwMA&p… → no permissions-policy
  • FoundCookie flagsMedium

    14 of 15 cookies are missing protective flags. Without HttpOnly a script can read the cookie; without Secure it travels over plain HTTP; without SameSite it is sent on cross-site requests.

    • MUID (set by https://bing.com/) lacks HttpOnly
    • MUIDB (set by https://bing.com/) lacks Secure, SameSite
    • _EDGE_S (set by https://bing.com/) lacks Secure, SameSite
    • _EDGE_V (set by https://bing.com/) lacks Secure, SameSite
    • SRCHD (set by https://www.bing.com/?toWww=1&redig=1EC4884BDC664647A36713FF43CEE6C0) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • SRCHUID (set by https://www.bing.com/?toWww=1&redig=1EC4884BDC664647A36713FF43CEE6C0) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • SRCHUSR (set by https://www.bing.com/?toWww=1&redig=1EC4884BDC664647A36713FF43CEE6C0) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • SRCHHPGUSR (set by https://www.bing.com/?toWww=1&redig=1EC4884BDC664647A36713FF43CEE6C0) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • _SS (set by https://www.bing.com/?toWww=1&redig=1EC4884BDC664647A36713FF43CEE6C0) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • ULC (set by https://www.bing.com/?toWww=1&redig=1EC4884BDC664647A36713FF43CEE6C0) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • _HPVN (set by https://www.bing.com/?toWww=1&redig=1EC4884BDC664647A36713FF43CEE6C0) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • MMCASM (set by https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=&FORM=HDRSC2) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
  • FoundMixed contentLow

    181 resources on HTTPS pages are loaded over plain HTTP.

    • https://www.bing.com/search?q=Bing+AI&FORM=HDRSC1 loads image http://www.bing.com/sa/simg/facebook_sharing_5.png
    • https://www.bing.com/images?FORM=HDRSC2 loads image http://www.bing.com/sa/simg/facebook_sharing_5.png
    • https://www.bing.com/search?q=IA+Bing&FORM=HDRSC1 loads image http://www.bing.com/sa/simg/facebook_sharing_5.png
    • https://www.bing.com/search?q=Bing+AI&FORM=HDRSC1&setlang=fr&sid=29E8… loads image http://www.bing.com/sa/simg/facebook_sharing_5.png
    • https://www.bing.com/search?q=Bing+AI&FPIG=ED2B04B4D233441098082298BF… loads image http://www.bing.com/sa/simg/facebook_sharing_5.png
    • https://www.bing.com/search?q=Bing+AI&FPIG=ED2B04B4D233441098082298BF… loads image http://www.bing.com/sa/simg/facebook_sharing_5.png
    • https://www.bing.com/search?q=Bing+AI&FPIG=ED2B04B4D233441098082298BF… loads image http://www.bing.com/sa/simg/facebook_sharing_5.png
    • https://www.bing.com/search?q=Bing+AI&FORM=000017&qpvt=Bing+AI loads image http://www.bing.com/sa/simg/facebook_sharing_5.png
    • https://www.bing.com/search?q=Bing+AI&filters=ex1%3a%22ez1%22&FORM=00… loads image http://www.bing.com/sa/simg/facebook_sharing_5.png
    • https://www.bing.com/search?q=Bing+AI&filters=ex1%3a%22ez2%22&FORM=00… loads image http://www.bing.com/sa/simg/facebook_sharing_5.png
    • https://www.bing.com/search?q=Bing+AI&filters=ex1%3a%22ez3%22&FORM=00… loads image http://www.bing.com/sa/simg/facebook_sharing_5.png
    • https://www.bing.com/search?q=Bing+AI&filters=ex1%3a%22ez5_20362_2072… loads image http://www.bing.com/sa/simg/facebook_sharing_5.png
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • r.bing.com (91 script tags)
8 checks passed, 1 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 1308 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set on 1074 of 1308 pages.

  • OKReferrer policy

    A referrer policy is set through a <meta name="referrer"> tag.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    No Server or X-Powered-By header is sent.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    18 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    No recognisable library versions were found in the sampled scripts.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near bing.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling bing.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own bing.com?

bing.com scan 2026-10-01-1758 | DIY SEO Hub