Scanned sites / www.tsoralhealth.com / 2026-11-09-2309

www.tsoralhealth.com scan from 2026-11-09 23:09:50 UTC DR 4

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-11-09-2309

Scanned 2026-11-09 23:09:50 UTC, finished 2026-11-09 23:10:49 UTC. Found with openstreetmap overpass

Site: https://www.tsoralhealth.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

82/ 100Good

On November 9, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 43 pages and 87 assets of www.tsoralhealth.com, starting from https://www.tsoralhealth.com/. It scored 82 out of 100, a good result. 8 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (25), image alt text (4), title tags (8); 15 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−6.7), image alt text (−4.8), title tags (−2.7). 10 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Low2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
43
Assets fetched
87
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
8 of 33
CoverageComplete crawl

130 of 131 discovered URLs were fetched, 1 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 28 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags8 issues
    8 of 29 pages have title issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −2.7 points
  • Meta descriptions25 issues
    25 of 29 pages have meta description issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −6.7 points
  • Headings1 issue
    1 of 29 pages have heading issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −0.2 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites25 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 24 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 28 destinations checked.
  • Redirects15 issues
    13 redirecting URLs, 4 of them chained.
    −2 points
  • Non-200 responses14 noted
    14 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 13 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 29 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 1 page noindex by design.
  • Image alt text4 issues
    4 of 5 image references have no alt attribute.
    −4.8 points
  • Heavy assetsOK
    0 assets larger than 500 KB among 87 fetched assets.
  • Orphan pages4 issues
    4 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.5 points
  • Sitemap coverage5 issues
    1 sitemap listing 28 URLs: 1 crawled page missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 4 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −1 points
  • Internal link counts1 noted
    Internal link counts for 30 pages; 1 worth a look.
  • Thin content2 issues
    2 of 29 pages have fewer than 200 words. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −0.5 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL formatOK
    All 43 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 30 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives30 noted
    30 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text2 noted
    2 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure16 noted
    16 of 29 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
  • Image weight and alt lengthOK
    No image is over 100 KB or carries alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationOK
    All 30 pages keep their head tags in <head>, once each, under Googlebot's 2 MB.
  • hreflangOK
    No page declares hreflang.
  • Structured data29 noted
    30 of 29 indexable pages carry structured data: BreadcrumbList (30), ListItem (30), Organization (30), WebSite (30), AggregateRating (30). 29 pages with errors a rich result would fail on.
  • Near duplicatesOK
    No near duplicates among 29 pages with enough text to compare.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 30 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positions13 noted
    13 of 25 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
  • Pagination1 noted
    2 pages in pagination sequences; 1 with problems.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 17 response headers recorded across 130 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 30 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • Spelling28 noted
    28 words an English dictionary does not know, on 19 pages. Product names and jargon will appear here too.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2884 sites, median 80%, average 79%

www.tsoralhealth.com scores 82%, higher than 56% of the 2884 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0761510%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 10 sites55%: 10 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 43 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 53 sites70%: 47 sites71%: 80 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 82 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 131 sites79%: 113 sites80%: 128 sites81%: 125 sites82%: 133 sites83%: 119 sites84%: 130 sites85%: 105 sites86%: 95 sites87%: 95 sites88%: 82 sites89%: 74 sites90%: 56 sites91%: 59 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 30 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 16 sites96%: 19 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 8 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 151 sites82% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Your site's health score is good, but there are a few key issues to address, particularly with redirects and meta descriptions, that can significantly enhance user experience and SEO performance. Prioritize these fixes.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Chained redirects slow down page loading and can hurt SEO.

    How: Eliminate unnecessary redirects by updating internal links to point directly to final URLs.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: Pages returning non-200 statuses can lead to poor user experience and lower SEO rankings.

    How: Identify and fix the 14 URLs not returning a 2xx response and ensure they correctly load.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Update Title Tags

    Why: Title tags are critical for SEO and first impressions; issues may hinder ranking.

    How: Revise 8 pages’ title tags to ensure they fit best practices (50-60 characters).

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: Meta descriptions help improve click-through rates; many pages are missing this critical element.

    How: Craft and implement meta descriptions for 25 pages where they are currently missing.

    Evidence: 18 pages have no meta description at all.

    18 pages affected

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Add Headings

    Why: Proper heading structures improve readability and SEO.

    How: Add an H1 tag to the one page currently missing it.

    Evidence: One page: missing h1.

    1 page affected

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Link Orphan Pages

    Why: Orphan pages are hard for users and search engines to find, impacting visibility.

    How: Create internal links to the 4 orphan pages to improve navigation and Indexability.

    Checks: orphan-pages

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The site has some low-severity security issues, including revealing server details and using third-party scripts without Subresource Integrity. Additionally, the robots.txt exposes sensitive paths that may require better access control. Fixes are recommended to enhance security.

  • 0 high
  • 0 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Server Version DisclosureLow

    Why it matters: The server and framework version information can be used by attackers to find known vulnerabilities.

    Fix: To mitigate this, consider removing the `x-powered-by` header or setting it to a blank value.

    Evidence: Software version disclosure

  2. 2

    Third-Party Scripts Without Subresource Integrity (SRI)Low

    Why it matters: Using scripts from external domains without SRI increases the risk of malicious alterations if those sources are compromised.

    Fix: Implement Subresource Integrity on external scripts, or define a Content-Security-Policy that restricts which external domains can load scripts.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  3. 3

    Sensitive Paths in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The robots.txt file lists a sensitive path, which could help an attacker identify areas to probe.

    Fix: Consider restricting access to sensitive paths with proper authentication instead of relying solely on robots.txt.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundSoftware version disclosureLow

    Responses reveal the exact server or framework version, which lets an attacker look up known vulnerabilities for it without guessing.

    • server: cloudflare (130 responses)
    • x-powered-by: WP Rocket/3.21.1 (2 responses)
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 4 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (30 script tags)
    • ajax.googleapis.com (30 script tags)
    • www.google.com (31 script tags)
    • form.jotform.com (1 script tag)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
10 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 30 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 30 HTML pages.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 30 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 30 HTML pages.

  • OKReferrer policy

    referrer-policy is set on all 30 HTML pages.

  • OKPermissions policy

    permissions-policy is set on all 30 HTML pages.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    The crawl set no cookies, so there are no cookie flags to check.

  • Not applicableForms over HTTPS

    No forms were found on the sampled pages.

  • Not applicableVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    No recognisable library versions were found in the sampled scripts.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.tsoralhealth.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.tsoralhealth.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.tsoralhealth.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.tsoralhealth.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.