Scanned sites / www.tsoralhealth.com / 2026-11-08-2044

www.tsoralhealth.com scan from 2026-11-08 20:44:50 UTC DR 4

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-11-08-2044

Scanned 2026-11-08 20:44:50 UTC, finished 2026-11-08 20:46:02 UTC. Found with openstreetmap overpass

Site: https://www.tsoralhealth.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

82/ 100Good

On November 8, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 43 pages and 80 assets of www.tsoralhealth.com, starting from https://www.tsoralhealth.com/. It scored 82 out of 100, a good result. 8 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (25), image alt text (3), title tags (8); 15 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−6.7), image alt text (−4.5), title tags (−2.7). 10 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Low2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
43
Assets fetched
80
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
8 of 33
CoverageComplete crawl

123 of 124 discovered URLs were fetched, 1 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 28 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags8 issues
    8 of 29 pages have title issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −2.7 points
  • Meta descriptions25 issues
    25 of 29 pages have meta description issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −6.7 points
  • Headings1 issue
    1 of 29 pages have heading issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −0.2 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites26 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 25 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 28 destinations checked.
  • Redirects15 issues
    13 redirecting URLs, 4 of them chained.
    −2 points
  • Non-200 responses14 noted
    14 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 13 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 29 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 1 page noindex by design.
  • Image alt text3 issues
    3 of 4 image references have no alt attribute.
    −4.5 points
  • Heavy assetsOK
    0 assets larger than 500 KB among 80 fetched assets.
  • Orphan pages4 issues
    4 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.5 points
  • Sitemap coverage5 issues
    1 sitemap listing 28 URLs: 1 crawled page missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 4 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −1 points
  • Internal link counts1 noted
    Internal link counts for 30 pages; 1 worth a look.
  • Thin content2 issues
    2 of 29 pages have fewer than 200 words. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −0.5 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL formatOK
    All 43 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 30 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives30 noted
    30 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text2 noted
    2 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure16 noted
    16 of 29 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
  • Image weight and alt lengthOK
    No image is over 100 KB or carries alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationOK
    All 30 pages keep their head tags in <head>, once each, under Googlebot's 2 MB.
  • hreflangOK
    No page declares hreflang.
  • Structured data29 noted
    30 of 29 indexable pages carry structured data: BreadcrumbList (30), ListItem (30), Organization (30), WebSite (30), AggregateRating (30). 29 pages with errors a rich result would fail on.
  • Near duplicatesOK
    No near duplicates among 29 pages with enough text to compare.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 30 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positions13 noted
    13 of 25 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
  • Pagination1 noted
    2 pages in pagination sequences; 1 with problems.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 17 response headers recorded across 123 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 30 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • Spelling28 noted
    28 words an English dictionary does not know, on 19 pages. Product names and jargon will appear here too.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2877 sites, median 80%, average 79%

www.tsoralhealth.com scores 82%, higher than 56% of the 2877 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0761510%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 6 sites52%: 9 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 10 sites55%: 10 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 43 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 53 sites70%: 47 sites71%: 80 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 82 sites74%: 83 sites75%: 86 sites76%: 94 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 132 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 128 sites81%: 124 sites82%: 133 sites83%: 119 sites84%: 131 sites85%: 105 sites86%: 95 sites87%: 95 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 75 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 59 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 28 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 15 sites96%: 19 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 8 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 151 sites82% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

The site shows good health but has key areas for improvement. Focus on fixing redirects, enhancing titles and meta descriptions, and addressing orphan pages for better performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirect Issues

    Why: Chained redirects can slow down site performance and confuse search engines.

    How: Update URLs to direct to final destinations without multiple hops, e.g., use direct links instead of redirect chains.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Address Missing Meta Descriptions

    Why: Meta descriptions aid in click-through rates by providing summary on search results.

    How: Write concise, relevant meta descriptions for 18 pages with missing entries to improve visibility.

    Evidence: 18 pages have no meta description at all.

    18 pages affected

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  3. 3

    Improve Title Tag Length

    Why: Title tags exceeding 60 characters may be truncated in search results, impacting readability.

    How: Optimize title tags that are either too long or too short to meet best practices without exceeding 60 characters.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Fix Orphan Pages

    Why: Orphan pages are inaccessible via site navigation, limiting their visibility and indexing potential.

    How: Add internal links from relevant pages to the four orphan pages to make them accessible.

    Checks: orphan-pages

  5. 5

    Add H1 to Missing Page

    Why: Pages without an H1 may confuse search engines about the page's main topic.

    How: Insert an appropriate H1 heading on the page missing this essential element.

    Evidence: One page: missing h1.

    1 page affected

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Add Alt Text to Images

    Why: Images without alt text impact accessibility and SEO, as search engines need context about the image.

    How: Provide descriptive alt text for the three images that currently lack it.

    Checks: images-alt

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

This security review identifies key vulnerabilities related to server version disclosure and third-party script usage. Addressing these issues will help mitigate potential security risks and improve the site's overall security posture.

  • 0 high
  • 0 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Server Version DisclosureLow

    Why it matters: Exposes exact versions of server and framework, making it easier for attackers to exploit known vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Remove or modify the 'Server' and 'X-Powered-By' headers to prevent version disclosure. For example, set 'Server: [your server name]' and remove 'X-Powered-By'.

    Evidence: Software version disclosure

  2. 2

    Third-Party Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Running scripts from external domains without Subresource Integrity (SRI) increases risk if any third-party site is compromised.

    Fix: Implement SRI for necessary scripts or, alternatively, use a Content-Security-Policy that restricts script execution to trusted sources.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  3. 3

    Sensitive Paths in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: Lists a potentially private path (/wp-admin/) that can inform attackers about the site's structure.

    Fix: Restrict access to sensitive paths using proper access controls instead of relying on robots.txt.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundSoftware version disclosureLow

    Responses reveal the exact server or framework version, which lets an attacker look up known vulnerabilities for it without guessing.

    • server: cloudflare (123 responses)
    • x-powered-by: WP Rocket/3.21.1 (2 responses)
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 4 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (30 script tags)
    • ajax.googleapis.com (30 script tags)
    • www.google.com (31 script tags)
    • form.jotform.com (1 script tag)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
10 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 30 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 30 HTML pages.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 30 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 30 HTML pages.

  • OKReferrer policy

    referrer-policy is set on all 30 HTML pages.

  • OKPermissions policy

    permissions-policy is set on all 30 HTML pages.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    The crawl set no cookies, so there are no cookie flags to check.

  • Not applicableForms over HTTPS

    No forms were found on the sampled pages.

  • Not applicableVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    No recognisable library versions were found in the sampled scripts.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.tsoralhealth.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.tsoralhealth.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.tsoralhealth.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.tsoralhealth.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.