Scanned sites / www.nursesend.com / 2026-09-13-0912

www.nursesend.com scan from 2026-09-13 09:12:24 UTC DR 0

A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.nursesend.com.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-13-0912

Scanned 2026-09-13 09:12:24 UTC, finished 2026-09-13 15:41:10 UTC. Found on page 3 of brave web search results

Site: https://www.nursesend.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

86/ 100Good

On September 13, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 4730 pages and 89 assets of www.nursesend.com, starting from https://www.nursesend.com/. It scored 86 out of 100, a good result. 13 of 26 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (47), title tags (1,920), meta descriptions (1,851); 7 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), title tags (−4.2), meta descriptions (−3.2). 6 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 11 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium1 medium, 1 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
4730
Assets fetched
89
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
13 of 26
CoverageJob finished, partial coverage

4,819 of 5,089 discovered URLs were fetched, 270 blocked by robots.txt, 214,880 left out by the 5,000-page and 1,000-asset budget. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 300 link destinations on other sites were checked, 498 left unchecked.

  • Title tags1,920 issues
    1920 of 2241 pages have title issues. 2333 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.2 points
  • Meta descriptions1,851 issues
    1851 of 2241 pages have meta description issues. 2333 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.2 points
  • Headings1 issue
    1 of 2241 pages have heading issues. 2333 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Broken links54 issues
    59 internal links point at 54 broken URLs.
    −0.2 points
  • Links to other sites4 issues
    4 destinations answered with an error, 118 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 498 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
  • Redirects102 issues
    103 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.1 points
  • Non-200 responses54 issues
    157 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 156 of them are pages, 54 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.1 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability1 issue
    1 of 2242 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 2332 pages noindex by design.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 16 image references have no alt attribute.
  • Heavy assets47 issues
    47 assets larger than 500 KB among 89 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages7 issues
    7 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage274 issues
    49 sitemaps listing 210,882+ URLs (first 5,000 entries read): 268 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 6 reachable only via the sitemap. 208,909 listed URLs not crawled within the 5000-page budget.
    −0.4 points
  • Internal link counts241 noted
    Internal link counts for 500 pages; 241 worth a look.
  • Thin content1 issue
    1 of 2241 pages have fewer than 200 words. 2333 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate content3 issues
    1 group of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format30 noted
    30 of 4730 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals2 noted
    2 of 4574 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives4,470 noted
    4470 pages carry a robots directive; 104 carry none.
  • Anchor textOK
    Every internal link has descriptive, followed anchor text.
  • Title and heading structure1,778 noted
    1778 of 2241 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 2333 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt lengthOK
    No image is over 100 KB or carries alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies85 noted
    85 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 4574 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 14 response headers recorded across 4819 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 4574 pages; 4511 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2342 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.nursesend.com scores 86%, higher than 77% of the 2342 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581160%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 70 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 70 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 107 sites79%: 85 sites80%: 107 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 116 sites83%: 100 sites84%: 106 sites85%: 87 sites86%: 71 sites87%: 73 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 65 sites90%: 36 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 12 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 5 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 68 sites86% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site has a few critical SEO issues needing attention, particularly broken links and title tag problems. Addressing these will enhance user experience and search engine ranking.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: 59 internal links point to broken URLs, impacting user experience and SEO.

    How: Identify broken links and update or remove the internal links directing to them.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: 157 URLs did not return a 2xx response, hindering accessibility and indexing.

    How: Review these URLs and ensure they return a proper response or update links accordingly.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Update Title Tags

    Why: 1920 pages have title issues, which affects search visibility.

    How: Revise titles to ensure they meet optimal length (30-60 characters) and are unique.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Revise Meta Descriptions

    Why: 96 pages have meta description issues, which can impact click-through rates in search results.

    How: Edit meta descriptions to be under 160 characters and unique for each page.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Improve Sitemap Coverage

    Why: 268 crawled pages are missing from sitemaps, reducing indexing efficiency.

    How: Update the sitemap to include these pages or verify their indexing status.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

  6. 6

    Address Orphan Pages

    Why: 7 pages are not linked internally and are difficult for search engines to discover.

    How: Add internal links to these orphan pages from relevant content to enhance navigation.

    Checks: orphan-pages

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The site lacks a Content-Security-Policy, exposing it to risks from malicious scripts. Additionally, the server version is publicly disclosed, providing attackers with potential knowledge of vulnerabilities. Consider implementing security headers to enhance protection.

  • 0 high
  • 1 medium
  • 1 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: A CSP helps prevent various attacks, including Cross-Site Scripting (XSS), by controlling resource loading.

    Fix: Add a Content-Security-Policy header, e.g., Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; script-src 'self';

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  2. 2

    Server Version DisclosureLow

    Why it matters: Revealing server version can assist attackers in identifying known vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Hide server version by configuring the web server: ServerTokens Prod; ServerSignature Off.

    Evidence: Software version disclosure

  3. 3

    Sensitive Paths Listed in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The public robots.txt could guide attackers to sensitive areas of the site.

    Fix: Restrict access to /wp-admin/, /login/, and /admin/ through proper authentication and permissions.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 4574 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://www.nursesend.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.nursesend.com/hire-nurses/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.nursesend.com/locations/new-york/new-york/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.nursesend.com/locations/california/los-angeles/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.nursesend.com/locations/illinois/chicago/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.nursesend.com/locations/texas/houston/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.nursesend.com/locations/texas/dallas/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.nursesend.com/locations/texas/san-antonio/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.nursesend.com/locations/florida/miami/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.nursesend.com/locations/georgia/atlanta/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.nursesend.com/locations/massachusetts/boston/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.nursesend.com/locations/california/san-francisco/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundSoftware version disclosureLow

    Responses reveal the exact server or framework version, which lets an attacker look up known vulnerabilities for it without guessing.

    • server: Apache/2.4.66 (Debian) (4819 responses)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 3 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /login/
    • Disallow: /admin/
9 checks passed, 4 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 4574 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 4574 HTML pages.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 4574 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 4574 HTML pages.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    1 form found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKThird-party scripts

    The sampled pages load no scripts from other domains.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    No recognisable library versions were found in the sampled scripts.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.nursesend.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.nursesend.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.nursesend.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.nursesend.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.