Scanned sites / www.nursesend.com

SEO report for www.nursesend.com DR 0

The latest Site Spider scan of www.nursesend.com, with 3 scans on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/www-nursesend-com/2026-10-03-0547.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-10-03 05:47:44 UTC, finished 2026-10-03 10:03:39 UTC. Found on page 3 of brave web search results

Site: https://www.nursesend.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

86/ 100Good

On October 3, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 4730 pages and 89 assets of www.nursesend.com, starting from https://www.nursesend.com/. It scored 86 out of 100, a good result. 12 of 26 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (47), title tags (1,924), meta descriptions (1,855); 8 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), title tags (−4.2), meta descriptions (−3.2). 6 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 11 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium1 medium, 1 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
4730
Assets fetched
89
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
12 of 26
CoverageJob finished, partial coverage

4,819 of 5,089 discovered URLs were fetched, 270 blocked by robots.txt, 214,877 left out by the 5,000-page and 1,000-asset budget. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 300 link destinations on other sites were checked, 503 left unchecked.

  • Title tags1,924 issues
    1924 of 2245 pages have title issues. 2335 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.2 points
  • Meta descriptions1,855 issues
    1855 of 2245 pages have meta description issues. 2335 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.2 points
  • Headings1 issue
    1 of 2245 pages have heading issues. 2335 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Broken links51 issues
    56 internal links point at 51 broken URLs.
    −0.2 points
  • Links to other sites5 issues
    5 destinations answered with an error, 119 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 503 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
  • Redirects99 issues
    100 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.1 points
  • Non-200 responses51 issues
    151 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 150 of them are pages, 51 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.1 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability1 issue
    1 of 2246 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 2334 pages noindex by design.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 16 image references have no alt attribute.
  • Heavy assets47 issues
    47 assets larger than 500 KB among 89 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages7 issues
    7 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage274 issues
    49 sitemaps listing 210,882+ URLs (first 5,000 entries read): 268 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 6 reachable only via the sitemap. 208,905 listed URLs not crawled within the 5000-page budget.
    −0.4 points
  • Internal link counts240 noted
    Internal link counts for 500 pages; 240 worth a look.
  • Thin content1 issue
    1 of 2245 pages have fewer than 200 words. 2335 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format30 noted
    30 of 4730 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals2 noted
    2 of 4580 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives4,476 noted
    4476 pages carry a robots directive; 104 carry none.
  • Anchor textOK
    Every internal link has descriptive, followed anchor text.
  • Title and heading structure1,782 noted
    1782 of 2245 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 2335 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt lengthOK
    No image is over 100 KB or carries alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies85 noted
    85 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 4580 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 17 response headers recorded across 4819 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 4580 pages; 4517 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

What changed since the last scan

Score unchanged

www.nursesend.com scored 86 out of 100 in both of its last two scans. That is a steady score, not an unchanged site: 77 findings changed between the two scans. The two crawls did not cover the same ground, so part of the difference is coverage rather than change. 6 URLs the earlier crawl reached were not reached this time. Across 3 scans on record the score has ended up where it started, at 86.

  • Pages: 6 new
  • Broken links: 3 not re-checked
  • Page status codes: 6 gone
  • Redirects: 3 not re-checked
  • Internal links to the page: 64 changed
  • Crawl depth: 1 changed
  • 6 URLs from the earlier crawl were not reached this time
  • Crawl coverage differed between the two scans; some differences may be coverage rather than change
  1. 2026-09-13 09:12:24 UTC86/1004,730 pages
  2. 2026-10-01 00:56:43 UTC86/1004,730 pages
  3. 2026-10-03 05:47:44 UTC86/1004,730 pages

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2340 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.nursesend.com scores 86%, higher than 77% of the 2340 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581160%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 70 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 70 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 107 sites79%: 85 sites80%: 107 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 116 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 106 sites85%: 87 sites86%: 71 sites87%: 73 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 64 sites90%: 36 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 12 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 5 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 68 sites86% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis (rules v4). The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

The website has several critical issues that need attention, especially regarding broken links, redirects, and missing metadata. Prioritizing these fixes will enhance user experience and potentially improve SEO performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: 56 internal links point to non-existent pages, causing user frustration.

    How: Identify broken links on affected pages and update or remove them.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Redirects

    Why: 100 redirecting URLs can lead to poor user experience and lost link equity.

    How: Consolidate and remove unnecessary redirects, ensuring all pages load correctly.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Address Non-200 Responses

    Why: 151 URLs returning non-2xx responses can harm accessibility and SEO.

    How: Review and correct URL statuses to ensure all pages and assets return 200 responses.

    Checks: status-codes

  4. 4

    Improve Title Tags

    Why: 1924 pages have title issues affecting search visibility.

    How: Revise titles to be unique, concise, and relevant, adhering to length best practices.

    Checks: titles

  5. 5

    Enhance Meta Descriptions

    Why: 1855 pages lack compelling meta descriptions, impacting click-through rates.

    How: Create unique meta descriptions for each page to improve relevance and draw in users.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  6. 6

    Optimize Heavy Assets

    Why: 47 assets exceed 500 KB, which impacts page loading speed.

    How: Compress large images and media files to improve loading times across pages.

    Evidence: 3.9 KB of image, loaded by 4580 pages, so every visitor to any of them downloads it.

    4,580 pages affected

    Depends on: If it is a download rather than part of the page, weight matters less; move it out of the page instead.

    Checks: heavy-assets

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website lacks a Content Security Policy, leaving it vulnerable to certain attacks. It also discloses server software versions, which could aid attackers. Sensitive paths are listed in robots.txt, exposing them to potential probing. Addressing these issues is crucial for improving security.

  • 0 high
  • 1 medium
  • 1 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: Without a Content Security Policy, the site is vulnerable to script injection attacks.

    Fix: Implement a Content Security Policy in your HTTP headers to restrict sources of scripts and other content.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  2. 2

    Software Version DisclosureLow

    Why it matters: Revealing exact server and framework versions can assist attackers in exploiting known vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Remove or customize the 'Server' and 'X-Powered-By' headers in your server configuration to prevent version leakage.

    Evidence: Software version disclosure

  3. 3

    Sensitive Paths in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: Listing paths like /wp-admin/ and /admin/ in robots.txt exposes them publicly, which could attract unwanted attention.

    Fix: Restrict access to sensitive paths using real authentication and authorization controls instead of relying on robots.txt.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 4580 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://www.nursesend.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.nursesend.com/hire-nurses/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.nursesend.com/locations/new-york/new-york/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.nursesend.com/locations/california/los-angeles/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.nursesend.com/locations/illinois/chicago/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.nursesend.com/locations/texas/houston/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.nursesend.com/locations/texas/dallas/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.nursesend.com/locations/texas/san-antonio/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.nursesend.com/locations/florida/miami/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.nursesend.com/locations/georgia/atlanta/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.nursesend.com/locations/massachusetts/boston/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.nursesend.com/locations/california/san-francisco/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundSoftware version disclosureLow

    Responses reveal the exact server or framework version, which lets an attacker look up known vulnerabilities for it without guessing.

    • server: Apache/2.4.66 (Debian) (4819 responses)
    • x-powered-by: PHP/8.3.30 (41 responses)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 3 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /login/
    • Disallow: /admin/
11 checks passed, 2 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 4580 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 4580 HTML pages.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 4580 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 4580 HTML pages.

  • OKReferrer policy

    referrer-policy is set on all 4580 HTML pages.

  • OKPermissions policy

    permissions-policy is set on all 4580 HTML pages.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    1 form found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKThird-party scripts

    The sampled pages load no scripts from other domains.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    The crawl set no cookies, so there are no cookie flags to check.

  • Not applicableVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    No recognisable library versions were found in the sampled scripts.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of www.nursesend.com

Sites scoring near www.nursesend.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.nursesend.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.nursesend.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.nursesend.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.