Scanned sites / www.roastlocal.com

SEO report for www.roastlocal.com DR 17

The latest Site Spider scan of www.roastlocal.com, with 7 scans on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/www-roastlocal-com/2026-10-03-1300.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-10-03 13:00:06 UTC, finished 2026-10-04 06:18:47 UTC. Found on page 4 of brave web search results

Site: https://www.roastlocal.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

86/ 100Good

On October 3, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 4997 pages and 992 assets of www.roastlocal.com, starting from https://www.roastlocal.com/. It scored 86 out of 100, a good result. 9 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (20), thin content (1,957), sitemap coverage (1,711); 10 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), thin content (−3.1), sitemap coverage (−2.1). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium1 medium and 1 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
4997
Assets fetched
992
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
9 of 27
CoverageJob finished, partial coverage

5,989 of 6,000 discovered URLs were fetched, 11 blocked by robots.txt, 192,023 left out by the 5,000-page and 1,000-asset budget. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 300 link destinations on other sites were checked, 4739 left unchecked.

  • Title tags279 issues
    279 of 4991 pages have title issues. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.6 points
  • Meta descriptions687 issues
    687 of 4991 pages have meta description issues. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1.1 points
  • Headings1 issue
    1 of 4991 pages have heading issues. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites2 issues
    2 destinations answered with an error, 19 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 4739 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
  • Redirects1 issue
    4 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responses7 noted
    7 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 4 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 4993 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 12357 image references have no alt attribute.
  • Heavy assets20 issues
    20 assets larger than 500 KB among 992 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages1,692 issues
    1692 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −1.4 points
  • Sitemap coverage1,711 issues
    1 sitemap listing 5,000+ URLs (first 5,000 entries read): 15 crawled pages missing, 4 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 1692 reachable only via the sitemap. 20 listed URLs not crawled within the 5000-page budget.
    −2.1 points
  • Internal link counts38 noted
    Internal link counts for 500 pages; 38 worth a look.
  • Thin content1,957 issues
    1957 of 4991 pages have fewer than 200 words. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.1 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format11 noted
    11 of 4997 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals2 noted
    2 of 4993 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directivesOK
    No page carries a robots directive; all 4993 pages are open to search engines.
  • Anchor text231 noted
    231 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure790 noted
    790 of 4991 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length48 noted
    39 images over 100 KB; 9 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 4993 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 18 response headers recorded across 5989 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 4993 pages; 4959 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights4 noted
    Mobile performance 85 on average across 5 pages; 4 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

What changed since the last scan

Score unchanged

www.roastlocal.com scored 86 out of 100 in both of its last two scans. That is a steady score, not an unchanged site: 49 findings changed between the two scans. The two crawls did not cover the same ground, so part of the difference is coverage rather than change. 229 URLs the earlier crawl reached were not reached this time. Across 7 scans on record it is down 3 points overall.

  • Pages: 5 new, 5 not re-checked
  • Internal links to the page: 44 changed
  • 229 URLs from the earlier crawl were not reached this time
  • Crawl coverage differed between the two scans; some differences may be coverage rather than change
  1. 2026-09-12 14:11:49 UTC89/1003,868 pages
  2. 2026-09-13 18:32:18 UTC88/1004,997 pages
  3. 2026-09-26 19:22:34 UTC86/1004,997 pages
  4. 2026-10-01 17:00:12 UTC86/1004,997 pages
  5. 2026-10-02 15:06:40 UTC86/1004,997 pages
  6. 2026-10-03 03:00:25 UTC86/1004,997 pages
  7. 2026-10-03 13:00:06 UTC86/1004,997 pages

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2333 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.roastlocal.com scores 86%, higher than 77% of the 2333 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0571140%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 70 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 107 sites81%: 106 sites82%: 114 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 106 sites85%: 86 sites86%: 71 sites87%: 74 sites88%: 58 sites89%: 64 sites90%: 34 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 11 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 69 sites86% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis (rules v4). The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site has good health, but several areas need improvement for better SEO. Prioritize fixing redirects, optimizing titles, meta descriptions, adding headings, reducing heavy assets, and addressing orphan pages.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirecting URLs

    Why: Redirects can harm user experience and SEO.

    How: Update the 4 URLs to directly link to their final destinations instead of redirecting.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: 279 pages have short titles which impact SEO rankings.

    How: Aim for titles over 30 characters. Revise the flagged pages for better optimization.

    Checks: titles

  3. 3

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: 687 pages have issues leading to potentially cut-off descriptions.

    How: Enhance meta descriptions to be concise yet informative, ideally under 160 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  4. 4

    Add Missing Headings

    Why: Proper headings improve content organization and SEO.

    How: Add a clear H1 heading to the affected page to signify the main topic.

    Checks: headings

  5. 5

    Reduce Heavy Assets

    Why: 20 heavy assets can slow down page load times, affecting user experience.

    How: Optimize or compress the large images listed, targeting those over 500 KB.

    Evidence: 707 KB of image, loaded by 10 pages, so every visitor to any of them downloads it.

    10 pages affected

    Depends on: If it is a download rather than part of the page, weight matters less; move it out of the page instead.

    Checks: heavy-assets

  6. 6

    Link Orphan Pages

    Why: 1692 orphan pages lack internal links, harming SEO.

    How: Create internal links to these pages from relevant existing content.

    Checks: orphan-pages

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website roastlocal.com has some security concerns regarding its Content Security Policy (CSP) and server response headers. The CSP currently allows risky behaviors, and while the server versions are hidden, the framework is still disclosed, which could provide attackers with useful information.

  • 0 high
  • 1 medium
  • 1 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Insecure Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: The CSP allows 'unsafe-inline' and 'unsafe-eval', reducing protection against script injections.

    Fix: Update your CSP by removing 'unsafe-inline' and 'unsafe-eval' from the script-src directive.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  2. 2

    Software Version DisclosureLow

    Why it matters: The X-Powered-By header exposes the framework, which can aid attackers in targeting vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Consider removing the X-Powered-By header or set it to a non-descriptive value in your server configuration.

    Evidence: Software version disclosure

What the checks found

  • NoteContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, but it allows inline or eval scripts ('unsafe-inline' / 'unsafe-eval'), which removes most of its protection against injected scripts.

    • https://www.roastlocal.com/ → default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://js.stripe.com https://*.supabase.co https://plausible.io https://us-assets.i.posthog.com; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://fonts.googleapis.com; font-src 'self' https://fonts.gstatic.com; img-src 'self' data: blob: h
    • https://www.roastlocal.com/explore → default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://js.stripe.com https://*.supabase.co https://plausible.io https://us-assets.i.posthog.com; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://fonts.googleapis.com; font-src 'self' https://fonts.gstatic.com; img-src 'self' data: blob: h
    • https://www.roastlocal.com/states → default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://js.stripe.com https://*.supabase.co https://plausible.io https://us-assets.i.posthog.com; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://fonts.googleapis.com; font-src 'self' https://fonts.gstatic.com; img-src 'self' data: blob: h
    • https://www.roastlocal.com/shop → default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://js.stripe.com https://*.supabase.co https://plausible.io https://us-assets.i.posthog.com; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://fonts.googleapis.com; font-src 'self' https://fonts.gstatic.com; img-src 'self' data: blob: h
    • https://www.roastlocal.com/blog → default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://js.stripe.com https://*.supabase.co https://plausible.io https://us-assets.i.posthog.com; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://fonts.googleapis.com; font-src 'self' https://fonts.gstatic.com; img-src 'self' data: blob: h
    • https://www.roastlocal.com/blog/best-coffee-roasters-halifax → default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://js.stripe.com https://*.supabase.co https://plausible.io https://us-assets.i.posthog.com; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://fonts.googleapis.com; font-src 'self' https://fonts.gstatic.com; img-src 'self' data: blob: h
    • https://www.roastlocal.com/blog/best-coffee-roasters-toronto → default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://js.stripe.com https://*.supabase.co https://plausible.io https://us-assets.i.posthog.com; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://fonts.googleapis.com; font-src 'self' https://fonts.gstatic.com; img-src 'self' data: blob: h
    • https://www.roastlocal.com/blog/best-coffee-roasters-phoenix → default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://js.stripe.com https://*.supabase.co https://plausible.io https://us-assets.i.posthog.com; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://fonts.googleapis.com; font-src 'self' https://fonts.gstatic.com; img-src 'self' data: blob: h
    • https://www.roastlocal.com/blog/best-coffee-roasters-boston → default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://js.stripe.com https://*.supabase.co https://plausible.io https://us-assets.i.posthog.com; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://fonts.googleapis.com; font-src 'self' https://fonts.gstatic.com; img-src 'self' data: blob: h
    • https://www.roastlocal.com/blog/best-coffee-roasters-nashville → default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://js.stripe.com https://*.supabase.co https://plausible.io https://us-assets.i.posthog.com; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://fonts.googleapis.com; font-src 'self' https://fonts.gstatic.com; img-src 'self' data: blob: h
    • https://www.roastlocal.com/blog/best-coffee-roasters-winnipeg → default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://js.stripe.com https://*.supabase.co https://plausible.io https://us-assets.i.posthog.com; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://fonts.googleapis.com; font-src 'self' https://fonts.gstatic.com; img-src 'self' data: blob: h
    • https://www.roastlocal.com/blog/best-coffee-roasters-washington-dc → default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://js.stripe.com https://*.supabase.co https://plausible.io https://us-assets.i.posthog.com; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://fonts.googleapis.com; font-src 'self' https://fonts.gstatic.com; img-src 'self' data: blob: h
  • NoteSoftware version disclosure

    Responses name the framework in an X-Powered-By header but hide the version.

    • server: Vercel (5989 responses)
    • x-powered-by: Next.js (4782 responses)
12 checks passed, 2 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 4993 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 4993 HTML pages.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 4993 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 4993 HTML pages.

  • OKReferrer policy

    referrer-policy is set on all 4993 HTML pages.

  • OKPermissions policy

    permissions-policy is set on all 4993 HTML pages.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    56 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKThird-party scripts

    The sampled pages load no scripts from other domains.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    The crawl set no cookies, so there are no cookie flags to check.

  • Not applicableVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    No recognisable library versions were found in the sampled scripts.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of www.roastlocal.com

Sites scoring near www.roastlocal.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.roastlocal.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.roastlocal.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.roastlocal.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.