Scanned sites / www.capitaleyecare.com / 2026-09-11-1351

www.capitaleyecare.com scan from 2026-09-11 13:51:33 UTC DR 6

A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.capitaleyecare.com.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-11-1351

Scanned 2026-09-11 13:51:33 UTC, finished 2026-09-11 13:57:14 UTC

Site: https://www.capitaleyecare.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

89/ 100Good

On September 11, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 197 pages and 51 assets of www.capitaleyecare.com, starting from https://www.capitaleyecare.com/. It scored 89 out of 100, a good result. 7 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (58), sitemap coverage (65), meta descriptions (44); 12 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−3.6), sitemap coverage (−2.4), meta descriptions (−2.2). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium2 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
197
Assets fetched
51
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
7 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

248 of 248 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 17 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags58 issues
    58 of 73 pages have title issues. 90 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.6 points
  • Meta descriptions44 issues
    44 of 73 pages have meta description issues. 90 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.2 points
  • Headings2 issues
    2 of 73 pages have heading issues. 90 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.1 points
  • Broken links11 issues
    561 internal links point at 11 broken URLs.
    −1.3 points
  • Links to other sites693 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 8 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 16 destinations checked.
  • Redirects20 issues
    19 redirecting URLs, 5 of them chained.
    −0.5 points
  • Non-200 responses15 issues
    34 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 34 of them are pages, 15 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.9 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 73 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 90 pages noindex by design.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 778 image references have no alt attribute. 4 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assetsOK
    0 assets larger than 500 KB among 51 fetched assets.
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage65 issues
    1 sitemap listing 8 URLs: 65 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −2.4 points
  • Internal link counts99 noted
    Internal link counts for 163 pages; 99 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 73 pages have fewer than 200 words. 90 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format15 noted
    15 of 197 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 163 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives156 noted
    156 pages carry a robots directive; 7 carry none.
  • Anchor text93 noted
    93 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure70 noted
    70 of 73 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 90 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt lengthOK
    No image is over 100 KB or carries alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies9 noted
    9 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 163 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 14 response headers recorded across 248 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 163 pages; 115 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 56 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2333 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.capitaleyecare.com scores 89%, higher than 86% of the 2333 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0571140%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 7 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 31 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 70 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 108 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 114 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 106 sites85%: 86 sites86%: 71 sites87%: 74 sites88%: 58 sites89%: 65 sites90%: 33 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 11 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 69 sites89% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your website has several issues that can impact SEO performance, including broken links, redirects, and missing title tags and meta descriptions. Prioritize fixing these areas for better visibility and user experience.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: 561 internal links are pointing to 11 broken URLs, which can harm user experience and SEO.

    How: Identify and update or remove broken links. Use 'Broken links' tool to find these URLs.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Redirect Issues

    Why: 19 redirecting URLs, including 5 chained redirects, can slow down page load speeds.

    How: Minimize redirects by directly linking to the final URL from your internal links. Check with 'Redirects' tool.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Address Non-200 Responses

    Why: 34 URLs return non-200 responses, negatively affecting usability and indexing.

    How: Review and fix these URLs to ensure they return a 200 status. Use 'Non-200 responses' tool for details.

    Checks: status-codes

  4. 4

    Improve Title Tags

    Why: 58 out of 73 pages have title issues, which can limit search visibility.

    How: Create unique, descriptive titles for pages with issues, ensuring they are 30-60 characters long. Use 'Title tags' tool for review.

    Checks: titles

  5. 5

    Enhance Meta Descriptions

    Why: 35 out of 73 pages have meta description issues, risking lower click-through rates.

    How: Add concise, informative meta descriptions that include relevant keywords for each affected page. Check with 'Meta descriptions' tool.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  6. 6

    Fix Heading Issues

    Why: 2 pages have multiple H1s, causing confusion for search engines.

    How: Ensure each page has a single H1 along with relevant subheadings. Use 'Headings' tool to identify issues.

    Checks: headings

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The site has several security issues that need attention, including missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) headers, a publicly disclosed server version, and sensitive information exposed in the code. These vulnerabilities could allow attackers to intercept connections, exploit server weaknesses, or misuse API keys.

  • 0 high
  • 2 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, initial HTTP requests can be intercepted, posing security risks.

    Fix: Add the header 'Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload' to all HTML responses.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Exposed Google API KeyMedium

    Why it matters: A publicly visible Google API key without restrictions can be abused by attackers.

    Fix: Restrict this API key by HTTP referrer in the Google Cloud console and implement proper access controls.

    Evidence: Keys and secrets in page code

  3. 3

    Server Version DisclosureLow

    Why it matters: Revealing the server version can help attackers find and exploit known vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Change the response header to 'Server: nginx' to obscure the version number.

    Evidence: Software version disclosure

  4. 4

    Third-Party Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Compromised third-party scripts can alter site behavior or capture user data.

    Fix: Implement a Content-Security-Policy that includes trusted domains or consider using Subresource Integrity where possible.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  5. 5

    Sensitive Paths in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The robots.txt file can guide attackers to sensitive areas of the site.

    Fix: Restrict access to the listed paths (/wp-admin/ and /wp-login.php) with proper authentication controls.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/contact-us/appointment-request-form/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/patient-history-form/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/contact-us/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/hours-location/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/our-eye-doctors/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/the-staff/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/eye-care-services/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/eyeglasses-contacts/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/insurance/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/eye-care-services/management-of-ocular-diseases/glaucoma-testing-treatment/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/eye-care-services/your-eye-health/eye-diseases/diabetes-and-eyesight/treatment-for-diabe… → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundSoftware version disclosureLow

    Responses reveal the exact server or framework version, which lets an attacker look up known vulnerabilities for it without guessing.

    • server: nginx/1.26.3 (248 responses)
  • FoundKeys and secrets in page codeMedium

    1 credential-like value found in code served to every visitor: Google API key.

    • Google API key AIzaSy…uY (39 chars) in https://www.capitaleyecare.com/: browser keys are expected in pages, but must be restricted by HTTP referrer and API in the Google Cloud console
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 3 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • www.googleadservices.com (40 script tags)
    • ecpbuilder.com (1 script tag)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 2 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-login.php
8 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 163 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 163 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 163 HTML pages.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    116 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.capitaleyecare.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.capitaleyecare.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.capitaleyecare.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.capitaleyecare.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.