Scanned sites / www.capitaleyecare.com / 2026-09-10-0837

www.capitaleyecare.com scan from 2026-09-10 08:37:49 UTC DR 6

A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.capitaleyecare.com.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-10-0837

Scanned 2026-09-10 08:37:49 UTC, finished 2026-09-10 13:18:07 UTC

Site: https://www.capitaleyecare.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

89/ 100Good

On September 10, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 197 pages and 51 assets of www.capitaleyecare.com, starting from https://www.capitaleyecare.com/. It scored 89 out of 100, a good result. 7 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (58), sitemap coverage (65), meta descriptions (44); 12 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−3.6), sitemap coverage (−2.4), meta descriptions (−2.2). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium2 medium and 1 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
197
Assets fetched
51
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
7 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

248 of 248 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 17 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags58 issues
    58 of 73 pages have title issues. 90 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.6 points
  • Meta descriptions44 issues
    44 of 73 pages have meta description issues. 90 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.2 points
  • Headings2 issues
    2 of 73 pages have heading issues. 90 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.1 points
  • Broken links11 issues
    561 internal links point at 11 broken URLs.
    −1.3 points
  • Links to other sites693 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 8 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 16 destinations checked.
  • Redirects20 issues
    19 redirecting URLs, 5 of them chained.
    −0.5 points
  • Non-200 responses15 issues
    34 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 34 of them are pages, 15 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.9 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 73 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 90 pages noindex by design.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 778 image references have no alt attribute. 4 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assetsOK
    0 assets larger than 500 KB among 51 fetched assets.
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage65 issues
    1 sitemap listing 8 URLs: 65 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −2.4 points
  • Internal link counts99 noted
    Internal link counts for 163 pages; 99 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 73 pages have fewer than 200 words. 90 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format15 noted
    15 of 197 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 163 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives156 noted
    156 pages carry a robots directive; 7 carry none.
  • Anchor text93 noted
    93 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure70 noted
    70 of 73 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 90 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt lengthOK
    No image is over 100 KB or carries alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies9 noted
    9 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 163 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 14 response headers recorded across 248 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 163 pages; 115 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 56 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2333 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.capitaleyecare.com scores 89%, higher than 86% of the 2333 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0571140%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 7 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 31 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 70 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 108 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 114 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 106 sites85%: 86 sites86%: 71 sites87%: 74 sites88%: 58 sites89%: 65 sites90%: 33 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 11 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 69 sites89% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site has a few areas needing improvement, including broken links, redirects, and missing title/meta tags. Addressing these will enhance user experience and SEO performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: 561 internal links point to broken URLs. This affects user experience and can hurt SEO.

    How: Identify broken URLs and update or remove links pointing to them in your website content.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Redirects

    Why: 19 redirects, with 5 chains, can slow down site performance and confuse search engines.

    How: Eliminate unnecessary redirects, aiming for a direct link from URLs to their final destinations.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Fix Non-200 Status Codes

    Why: 34 URLs return non-200 responses, impacting accessibility and SEO.

    How: Identify these URLs and ensure they return a 200 status, correcting or removing as necessary.

    Checks: status-codes

  4. 4

    Improve Title Tags

    Why: 58 pages have title issues, affecting how they appear in search results.

    How: Revise title tags to be unique and descriptive, ensuring they have at least 30 characters.

    Checks: titles

  5. 5

    Enhance Meta Descriptions

    Why: 35 pages have issues with meta descriptions, which could lower click-through rates.

    How: Create unique meta descriptions for each page, ensuring they provide a summary and are around 150 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  6. 6

    Fix Heading Issues

    Why: 2 pages have multiple H1 tags, which can confuse search engines.

    How: Ensure each page has one H1 tag that accurately describes the content, and use H2 for subheadings.

    Checks: headings

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The site has several security issues, including the lack of HTTP Strict Transport Security, exposing server version details, and revealing sensitive API keys. Addressing these issues will improve overall security and reduce vulnerabilities.

  • 0 high
  • 2 medium
  • 1 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    Why it matters: Without this, visitors can be intercepted on their first request if they do not use HTTPS.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Exposed Google API KeyMedium

    Why it matters: Revealing this key can lead to unauthorized use of your Google services.

    Fix: Limit the API key's usage in the Google Cloud console by setting appropriate HTTP referrer restrictions.

    Evidence: Keys and secrets in page code

  3. 3

    Server Version DisclosureLow

    Why it matters: Details about server version can help attackers find known vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Modify your server configuration to disable version disclosure by setting: server_tokens off;

    Evidence: Software version disclosure

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/contact-us/appointment-request-form/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/patient-history-form/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/contact-us/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/hours-location/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/our-eye-doctors/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/the-staff/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/eye-care-services/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/eyeglasses-contacts/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/insurance/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/eye-care-services/management-of-ocular-diseases/glaucoma-testing-treatment/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.capitaleyecare.com/eye-care-services/your-eye-health/eye-diseases/diabetes-and-eyesight/treatment-for-diabe… → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundSoftware version disclosureLow

    Responses reveal the exact server or framework version, which lets an attacker look up known vulnerabilities for it without guessing.

    • server: nginx/1.26.3 (248 responses)
  • FoundKeys and secrets in page codeMedium

    1 credential-like value found in code served to every visitor: Google API key.

    • Google API key AIzaSy…uY (39 chars) in https://www.capitaleyecare.com/: browser keys are expected in pages, but must be restricted by HTTP referrer and API in the Google Cloud console
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 3 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • www.googleadservices.com (40 script tags)
    • ecpbuilder.com (2 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 2 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-login.php
8 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 163 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 163 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 163 HTML pages.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    116 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.capitaleyecare.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.capitaleyecare.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.capitaleyecare.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.capitaleyecare.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.