Scanned sites / www.capitaleyecare.com
SEO report for www.capitaleyecare.com DR 6
The latest Site Spider scan of www.capitaleyecare.com, with 3 scans on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/www-capitaleyecare-com/2026-10-01-0356.
DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.
Latest scan
Scanned 2026-10-01 03:56:35 UTC, finished 2026-10-01 04:55:43 UTC. Found on page 1 of brave web search results
Site: https://www.capitaleyecare.com/
Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.
On October 1, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 197 pages and 52 assets of www.capitaleyecare.com, starting from https://www.capitaleyecare.com/. It scored 89 out of 100, a good result. 7 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (58), sitemap coverage (65), meta descriptions (44); 12 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−3.6), sitemap coverage (−2.4), meta descriptions (−2.2). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.
Security review: Medium2 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓
- Pages crawled
- 197
- Assets fetched
- 52
- Status
- Completed
- Checks with issues
- 7 of 27
249 of 249 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 17 link destinations on other sites were checked.
- Title tags58 issues58 of 73 pages have title issues. 90 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−3.6 points
- Meta descriptions44 issues44 of 73 pages have meta description issues. 90 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−2.2 points
- Headings2 issues2 of 73 pages have heading issues. 90 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−0.1 points
- Broken links11 issues561 internal links point at 11 broken URLs.−1.3 points
- Links to other sites693 noted0 destinations answered with an error, 8 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 17 destinations checked.
- Redirects20 issues19 redirecting URLs, 5 of them chained.−0.5 points
- Non-200 responses15 issues34 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 34 of them are pages, 15 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.−0.9 points
- Rate limitedOKThe site did not rate limit the crawler.
- IndexabilityOK0 of 73 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 90 pages noindex by design.
- Image alt textOK0 of 778 image references have no alt attribute. 4 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
- Heavy assetsOK0 assets larger than 500 KB among 52 fetched assets.
- Orphan pagesOK0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
- Sitemap coverage65 issues1 sitemap listing 8 URLs: 65 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.−2.4 points
- Internal link counts99 notedInternal link counts for 163 pages; 99 worth a look.
- Thin contentOK0 of 73 pages have fewer than 200 words. 90 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Duplicate contentOK0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
- URL format15 noted15 of 197 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
- CanonicalsOK0 of 163 pages have a canonical worth checking.
- Robots directives156 noted156 pages carry a robots directive; 7 carry none.
- Anchor text93 noted93 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
- Title and heading structure70 noted70 of 73 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 90 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Image weight and alt lengthOKNo image is over 100 KB or carries alt text over 100 characters.
- Response anomalies9 noted9 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
- HTML and head validationNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- hreflangNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- Structured dataNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- Near duplicatesNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- Soft 404sOKNone of 163 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
- AccessibilityNot checkedNot checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
- Link positionsNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
- PaginationNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- Headers and cookiesOK0 cookies set by the site; 15 response headers recorded across 249 URLs.
- Orphans in searchNot checkedNot checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
- Link ScoreOKLink Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 163 pages; 115 hold almost none (10 or less).
- JavaScript renderingNot checkedNot checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
- PageSpeed Insights5 notedMobile performance 35 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
- SpellingNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
What changed since the last scan
Score unchangedwww.capitaleyecare.com scored 89 out of 100 in both of its last two scans. Across 3 scans on record the score has ended up where it started, at 89.
- 2026-09-10 08:37:49 UTC89/100197 pages
- 2026-09-11 13:51:33 UTC89/100197 pages
- 2026-10-01 03:56:35 UTC89/100197 pages
Where this site sits among all scanned sites
2325 sites, median 79%, average 78%
www.capitaleyecare.com scores 89%, higher than 86% of the 2325 scanned sites. See the full ranking.
Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).
Internal link map
Loading the link map...
Fix plan
Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findingsWritten from an earlier version of the analysis (rules v4). The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.
You have a good health score, but several internal issues need attention, mainly broken links and meta descriptions. Address these to enhance user experience and SEO performance.
- 1
Fix Broken Links
Why: 561 internal links are broken, impacting user experience and SEO.
How: Identify and remove links pointing to non-existent pages. Use the provided tasks to fix major broken URLs.
Checks: broken-links
- 2
Improve Meta Descriptions
Why: 44 pages lack proper meta descriptions, which help improve click-through rates.
How: Write unique and relevant meta descriptions for all pages that are missing them.
Checks: meta-descriptions
- 3
Resolve Redirect Issues
Why: 19 URLs redirect, with some being chained, affecting site speed and user experience.
How: Simplify redirects where possible by updating internal links to point to final URLs directly.
Checks: redirects
- 4
Address Title Tag Issues
Why: 58 pages have title issues, affecting search visibility and relevance.
How: Revise each title to ensure they are between 30 and 60 characters long and relevant.
Checks: titles
- 5
Fix Heading Structure
Why: 2 pages have multiple H1 headings, which can confuse search engines and users.
How: Ensure each page contains a single H1, then adjust other headings accordingly.
Checks: headings
- 6
Update Sitemap Coverage
Why: 65 critical pages are not listed in the sitemap, limiting their discoverability.
How: Add these pages to your sitemap to ensure search engines can crawl them effectively.
Checks: sitemap-coverage
Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.
Security review
Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawlYour website has several security vulnerabilities that should be addressed to protect user data and enhance privacy. Key issues include a lack of HTTP Strict Transport Security, missing referrer policies, and exposure of sensitive API keys. Prioritizing these fixes will help secure your users and improve overall security posture.
- 0 high
- 2 medium
- 2 low
- 1 info
- 1
Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium
Why it matters: Without HSTS, visitors may be intercepted on their first request if they type the site address without https://.
Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload.
Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security
- 2
Exposed Google API KeyMedium
Why it matters: The Google API key found in your code needs restrictions to prevent misuse by unauthorized parties.
Fix: Restrict the API key by HTTP referrer in the Google Cloud Console and ensure it’s not embedded in public code.
Evidence: Keys and secrets in page code
- 3
Missing Referrer PolicyLow
Why it matters: Without a proper Referrer Policy, sensitive page information can be exposed to third-party sites upon navigation.
Fix: Add the header: Referrer-Policy: no-referrer-when-downgrade.
Evidence: Referrer policy
- 4
Server Version DisclosureLow
Why it matters: Disclosing server version information can help attackers identify vulnerabilities to exploit.
Fix: Configure your web server to hide the version number, e.g., by setting server_tokens off in nginx.
Evidence: Software version disclosure
- 5
Missing Permissions PolicyInfo
Why it matters: A Permissions Policy can limit potential risks from injected scripts accessing sensitive browser features.
Fix: Add the header: Permissions-Policy: geolocation=(self), microphone=(), camera=().
Evidence: Permissions policy
What the checks found
- FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium
No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.
- https://www.capitaleyecare.com/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.capitaleyecare.com/contact-us/appointment-request-form/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.capitaleyecare.com/patient-history-form/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.capitaleyecare.com/contact-us/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.capitaleyecare.com/hours-location/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.capitaleyecare.com/our-eye-doctors/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.capitaleyecare.com/the-staff/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.capitaleyecare.com/eye-care-services/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.capitaleyecare.com/eyeglasses-contacts/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.capitaleyecare.com/insurance/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.capitaleyecare.com/eye-care-services/management-of-ocular-diseases/glaucoma-testing-treatment/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.capitaleyecare.com/eye-care-services/your-eye-health/eye-diseases/diabetes-and-eyesight/treatment-for-diabe… → no strict-transport-security
- FoundReferrer policyLow
No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.
- https://www.capitaleyecare.com/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.capitaleyecare.com/contact-us/appointment-request-form/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.capitaleyecare.com/patient-history-form/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.capitaleyecare.com/contact-us/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.capitaleyecare.com/hours-location/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.capitaleyecare.com/our-eye-doctors/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.capitaleyecare.com/the-staff/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.capitaleyecare.com/eye-care-services/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.capitaleyecare.com/eyeglasses-contacts/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.capitaleyecare.com/insurance/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.capitaleyecare.com/eye-care-services/management-of-ocular-diseases/glaucoma-testing-treatment/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.capitaleyecare.com/eye-care-services/your-eye-health/eye-diseases/diabetes-and-eyesight/treatment-for-diabe… → no referrer-policy
- FoundPermissions policyInfo
No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.
- https://www.capitaleyecare.com/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.capitaleyecare.com/contact-us/appointment-request-form/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.capitaleyecare.com/patient-history-form/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.capitaleyecare.com/contact-us/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.capitaleyecare.com/hours-location/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.capitaleyecare.com/our-eye-doctors/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.capitaleyecare.com/the-staff/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.capitaleyecare.com/eye-care-services/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.capitaleyecare.com/eyeglasses-contacts/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.capitaleyecare.com/insurance/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.capitaleyecare.com/eye-care-services/management-of-ocular-diseases/glaucoma-testing-treatment/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.capitaleyecare.com/eye-care-services/your-eye-health/eye-diseases/diabetes-and-eyesight/treatment-for-diabe… → no permissions-policy
- FoundSoftware version disclosureLow
Responses reveal the exact server or framework version, which lets an attacker look up known vulnerabilities for it without guessing.
- server: nginx/1.26.3 (249 responses)
- FoundKeys and secrets in page codeMedium
1 credential-like value found in code served to every visitor: Google API key.
- Google API key AIzaSy…uY (39 chars) in https://www.capitaleyecare.com/: browser keys are expected in pages, but must be restricted by HTTP referrer and API in the Google Cloud console
- NoteThird-party scripts
Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)
- www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
- www.googleadservices.com (40 script tags)
- NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt
robots.txt lists 2 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
- Disallow: /wp-login.php
8 checks passed, 1 not applicable
- OKHTTPS
All 163 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.
- OKContent Security Policy
A Content-Security-Policy is set.
- OKClickjacking protection
x-frame-options is set on all 163 HTML pages.
- OKMIME sniffing protection
x-content-type-options is set on all 163 HTML pages.
- OKMixed content
No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.
- OKForms over HTTPS
116 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.
- OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries
2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.
- OKExposed files and listings
None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.
- Not applicableCookie flags
The crawl set no cookies, so there are no cookie flags to check.
A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.
Earlier scans of www.capitaleyecare.com
- 2026-09-11 13:51:33 UTC (2026-09-11-1351)Score 89 · 197 pages
- 2026-09-10 08:37:49 UTC (2026-09-10-0837)Score 89 · 197 pages
Sites scoring near www.capitaleyecare.com
Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.
- www.providinginsight.caDR 789/100 · rank 266 · 14 pages
- volutiontax.caDR 289/100 · rank 266 · 33 pages
- www.alturakollur.comDR 089/100 · rank 266 · 6 pages
- www.waste-industries.comDR 789/100 · rank 266 · 38 pages
- arbuildershomes.comDR 189/100 · rank 266 · 96 pages
- mainepropertiesllc.comDR 2589/100 · rank 266 · 14 pages
DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.
This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.capitaleyecare.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.
Own www.capitaleyecare.com?
- Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
- Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.capitaleyecare.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.