Scanned sites / www.beautyrewind.ca / 2026-10-29-0659

www.beautyrewind.ca scan from 2026-10-29 06:59:57 UTC DR 13

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-10-29-0659

Scanned 2026-10-29 06:59:57 UTC, finished 2026-10-29 07:10:13 UTC. Found with openstreetmap overpass

Site: https://www.beautyrewind.ca/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

82/ 100Good

On October 29, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 158 pages and 652 assets of www.beautyrewind.ca, starting from https://www.beautyrewind.ca/. It scored 82 out of 100, a good result. 12 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (72), title tags (58), meta descriptions (70); 12 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), title tags (−3.9), meta descriptions (−3.8). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium2 medium, 2 low and 2 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
158
Assets fetched
652
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
12 of 33
CoverageComplete crawl

810 of 815 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 96 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags58 issues
    58 of 145 pages have title issues. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.9 points
  • Meta descriptions70 issues
    70 of 145 pages have meta description issues. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.8 points
  • Headings3 issues
    3 of 145 pages have heading issues. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.1 points
  • Broken links3 issues
    9 internal links point at 3 broken URLs.
    −0.4 points
  • Links to other sites4 issues
    4 destinations answered with an error, 46 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 96 destinations checked.
    −1.1 points
  • Redirects7 issues
    9 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.2 points
  • Non-200 responses3 issues
    12 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 11 of them are pages, 3 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.2 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability2 issues
    2 of 145 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 2 pages noindex by design. 2 noindex pages are listed in the sitemap, which asks search engines both to visit and to ignore them.
    −0.1 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 1891 image references have no alt attribute. 1126 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets72 issues
    72 assets larger than 500 KB among 652 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages28 issues
    28 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.8 points
  • Sitemap coverage33 issues
    9 sitemaps listing 144 URLs: 4 crawled pages missing, 1 listed URL broken or redirecting, 26 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −1.3 points
  • Internal link counts4 noted
    Internal link counts for 147 pages; 4 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 145 pages have fewer than 200 words. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate content3 issues
    1 group of pages with identical HTML.
    −0.2 points
  • URL formatOK
    All 158 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 147 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives147 noted
    147 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text14 noted
    14 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure30 noted
    30 of 145 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length92 noted
    91 images over 100 KB; 1 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies6 noted
    6 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationOK
    All 147 pages keep their head tags in <head>, once each, under Googlebot's 2 MB.
  • hreflangOK
    No page declares hreflang.
  • Structured dataOK
    46 of 145 indexable pages carry structured data: Product (34), Offer (34), Organization (34), BreadcrumbList (11), ListItem (11). 0 pages with errors a rich result would fail on.
  • Near duplicatesOK
    No near duplicates among 99 pages with enough text to compare.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 147 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positions13 noted
    13 of 119 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
  • Pagination4 noted
    8 pages in pagination sequences; 4 with problems.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    1 cookie set by the site; 15 response headers recorded across 810 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 147 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • Spelling100 noted
    100 words an English dictionary does not know, on 77 pages. Product names and jargon will appear here too.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2343 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.beautyrewind.ca scores 82%, higher than 59% of the 2343 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0591170%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 69 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 70 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 107 sites79%: 84 sites80%: 108 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 117 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 107 sites85%: 88 sites86%: 71 sites87%: 73 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 65 sites90%: 36 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 12 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 5 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 68 sites82% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Your site requires some improvements to enhance SEO performance. Focus on fixing broken links and meta descriptions, and optimize heavy assets for better loading times.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Broken links hinder user experience and SEO rankings.

    How: Identify and remove or update broken links on your site.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Optimize Meta Descriptions

    Why: Missing or lengthy meta descriptions can affect click-through rates.

    How: Create concise, engaging meta descriptions within recommended length for affected pages.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  3. 3

    Fix Non-200 Status Codes

    Why: URLs that return errors affect site performance and user experience.

    How: Review and correct the 12 URLs that do not return a 2xx status.

    Checks: status-codes

  4. 4

    Reduce Heavy Assets

    Why: Large assets slow down page loading, impacting SEO and user experience.

    How: Optimize images and other heavy assets to shrink their size.

    Checks: heavy-assets

  5. 5

    Resolve Indexability Warnings

    Why: Improper indexing may prevent pages from ranking in search results.

    How: Adjust indexing settings for pages that are incorrectly listed in the sitemap.

    Checks: indexability

  6. 6

    Link Orphan Pages

    Why: Orphan pages lack visibility and can miss out on traffic.

    How: Add internal links to orphan pages for better discoverability.

    Checks: orphan-pages

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website has several security headers missing, potentially exposing users to risks like interception on initial requests and clickjacking vulnerabilities. Addressing these issues with the recommended headers will improve its security posture significantly.

  • 0 high
  • 2 medium
  • 2 low
  • 2 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users can be intercepted when accessing the site without HTTPS.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing X-Frame-Options (Clickjacking protection)Medium

    Why it matters: Without this header, attackers can embed your pages in frames and overlay controls, potentially deceiving users.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY or implement CSP with frame-ancestors

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  3. 3

    Missing Referrer PolicyLow

    Why it matters: Without a Referrer-Policy, sensitive URLs can be disclosed to external sites when linking.

    Fix: Add the header: Referrer-Policy: no-referrer-when-downgrade

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  4. 4

    Third-Party Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from other domains could be compromised, altering the functionality of your site.

    Fix: Use Subresource Integrity (SRI) where possible, or create a CSP that limits who can serve scripts.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  5. 5

    Missing Permissions-PolicyInfo

    Why it matters: Not having a Permissions-Policy may allow injected scripts to access unnecessary browser features.

    Fix: Add the header: Permissions-Policy: interest-cohort=() to restrict access

    Evidence: Permissions policy

  6. 6

    Sensitive Path Listed in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The public robots.txt file can reveal sensitive paths, which may attract unwanted attention.

    Fix: Remove sensitive paths or implement real access control on those directories.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/about/patient-financing/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/skincare/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/vivier/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/zo-skin-health/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/under-eye-fillers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/cosmetic-injectable-fillers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/dermal-fillers-edmonton/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lip-fillers-edmonton/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lash-enhancement-treatment/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/acne-and-skin-consultation/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    1 of 147 HTML pages send x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/about/patient-financing/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/skincare/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/vivier/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/zo-skin-health/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/under-eye-fillers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/cosmetic-injectable-fillers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/dermal-fillers-edmonton/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lip-fillers-edmonton/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lash-enhancement-treatment/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/acne-and-skin-consultation/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/about/patient-financing/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/skincare/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/vivier/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/zo-skin-health/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/under-eye-fillers/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/cosmetic-injectable-fillers/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/dermal-fillers-edmonton/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lip-fillers-edmonton/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lash-enhancement-treatment/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/acne-and-skin-consultation/ → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/about/patient-financing/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/skincare/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/vivier/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/zo-skin-health/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/under-eye-fillers/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/cosmetic-injectable-fillers/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/dermal-fillers-edmonton/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lip-fillers-edmonton/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lash-enhancement-treatment/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/acne-and-skin-consultation/ → no permissions-policy
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • static.klaviyo.com (40 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
9 checks passed, 1 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 147 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set on 1 of 147 pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 147 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKCookie flags

    All 1 cookie carry Secure, HttpOnly and SameSite flags.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableForms over HTTPS

    No forms were found on the sampled pages.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.beautyrewind.ca

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.beautyrewind.ca from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.beautyrewind.ca?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.beautyrewind.ca. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.