Scanned sites / www.beautyrewind.ca / 2026-10-04-2258

www.beautyrewind.ca scan from 10/4/2026, 10:58:08 PM

Scan 2026-10-04-2258

Scanned 10/4/2026, 10:58:08 PM, finished 10/4/2026, 11:13:31 PM. Found with openstreetmap overpass

Site: https://www.beautyrewind.ca/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

84/ 100Good

On October 4, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 160 pages and 665 assets of www.beautyrewind.ca, starting from https://www.beautyrewind.ca/. It scored 84 out of 100, a good result. 8 of 22 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (72), meta descriptions (72), title tags (58); 6 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), title tags (−3.8), meta descriptions (−3.8). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 1 check was not run because the crawl fetched nothing for it. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium2 medium, 2 low and 2 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
160
Assets fetched
665
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
8 of 22
CoverageComplete crawl

825 of 831 discovered URLs were fetched, 1 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 95 link destinations on other sites have not been checked.

  • Title tags58 issues
    58 of 148 pages have title issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.8 points
  • Meta descriptions72 issues
    72 of 148 pages have meta description issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.8 points
  • Headings3 issues
    3 of 148 pages have heading issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.1 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sitesNot checked
    Not checked: the crawl fetched nothing this check can look at.
  • Redirects8 issues
    10 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.2 points
  • Non-200 responses10 noted
    10 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 9 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability2 issues
    2 of 148 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 3 pages noindex by design. 2 noindex pages are listed in the sitemap, which asks search engines both to visit and to ignore them.
    −0.1 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 1950 image references have no alt attribute. 1154 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets72 issues
    72 assets larger than 500 KB among 665 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages25 issues
    25 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.7 points
  • Sitemap coverage32 issues
    9 sitemaps listing 145 URLs: 6 crawled pages missing, 1 listed URL broken or redirecting, 23 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −1.3 points
  • Internal link counts7 noted
    Internal link counts for 151 pages; 7 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 148 pages have fewer than 200 words. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL formatOK
    All 160 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • Canonicals1 noted
    1 of 151 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives151 noted
    151 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text14 noted
    14 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure32 noted
    32 of 148 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length93 noted
    92 images over 100 KB; 1 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies7 noted
    7 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2071 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.beautyrewind.ca scores 84%, higher than 70% of the 2071 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0521030%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 0 sites10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 0 sites15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 1 site28%: 0 sites29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 1 site36%: 2 sites37%: 2 sites38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 2 sites41%: 1 site42%: 0 sites43%: 0 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 4 sites48%: 4 sites49%: 3 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 6 sites52%: 9 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 7 sites55%: 7 sites56%: 5 sites57%: 11 sites58%: 15 sites59%: 7 sites60%: 12 sites61%: 9 sites62%: 18 sites63%: 20 sites64%: 17 sites65%: 36 sites66%: 24 sites67%: 39 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 31 sites70%: 36 sites71%: 62 sites72%: 67 sites73%: 58 sites74%: 59 sites75%: 76 sites76%: 78 sites77%: 85 sites78%: 95 sites79%: 83 sites80%: 97 sites81%: 103 sites82%: 100 sites83%: 93 sites84%: 90 sites85%: 70 sites86%: 69 sites87%: 62 sites88%: 68 sites89%: 47 sites90%: 37 sites91%: 43 sites92%: 24 sites93%: 19 sites94%: 14 sites95%: 7 sites96%: 5 sites97%: 9 sites98%: 2 sites99%: 1 site100%: 57 sites84% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

The website has several SEO issues that need addressing, particularly with redirects, title tags, meta descriptions, and indexability. Prioritizing these fixes will enhance user experience and search engine performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: 10 URLs currently redirect, impacting user experience and search engine indexing.

    How: Update URLs to serve the final destination directly without redirects.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Address Non-200 Responses

    Why: 10 URLs are not returning 2xx responses, negatively affecting visibility.

    How: Check each URL and fix routing or status issues to ensure they respond correctly.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Improve Title Tags

    Why: 58 pages have title issues, which may affect click-through rates.

    How: Revise titles to ensure they are concise, relevant, and within ideal length limits.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Enhance Meta Descriptions

    Why: 72 pages have meta description issues that can impact search result appearance.

    How: Create or update meta descriptions to provide a clear summary and fall within optimal length.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Resolve Indexability Warnings

    Why: Two indexable pages are listed as noindex, misleading search engines.

    How: Remove noindex directives from pages that should be indexed.

    Checks: indexability

  6. 6

    Compress Heavy Assets

    Why: 72 assets exceed 500 KB, which can slow down page loading times.

    How: Reduce the size of large images and stylesheets to improve loading speeds.

    Checks: heavy-assets

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website lacks essential security headers, making it vulnerable to various attacks. The absence of HTTP Strict Transport Security and clickjacking protection could expose user data. Additionally, not implementing a referrer policy increases privacy risks. Proper security measures should be taken to safeguard user interactions and data privacy.

  • 0 high
  • 2 medium
  • 2 low
  • 2 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without this header, users who enter the site without HTTPS are vulnerable to interception.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Lack of this protection allows clickjacking, making users susceptible to malicious overlays.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  3. 3

    Missing Referrer-Policy HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Absence of this header can leak sensitive URL data to external sites.

    Fix: Add the header: Referrer-Policy: no-referrer.

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  4. 4

    Third-party scripts lack Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from external domains can be compromised, potentially altering site behavior.

    Fix: Implement Subresource Integrity or a Content Security Policy to restrict scripts.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  5. 5

    Missing Permissions-Policy HeaderInfo

    Why it matters: Not restricting features could expose users to risks from injected scripts.

    Fix: Add the header: Permissions-Policy: disallow 'camera', 'microphone', 'geolocation'.

    Evidence: Permissions policy

  6. 6

    Sensitive paths listed in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: Publicly listed paths could provide insights for attackers probing the site.

    Fix: Review the robots.txt to ensure it does not disclose sensitive paths.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/about/patient-financing/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/skincare/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/skinmedica/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/vivier/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/zo-skin-health/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/under-eye-fillers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/cosmetic-injectable-fillers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/dermal-fillers-edmonton/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lip-fillers-edmonton/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lash-enhancement-treatment/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    2 of 151 HTML pages send x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/about/patient-financing/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/skincare/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/skinmedica/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/vivier/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/zo-skin-health/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/under-eye-fillers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/cosmetic-injectable-fillers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/dermal-fillers-edmonton/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lip-fillers-edmonton/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lash-enhancement-treatment/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/about/patient-financing/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/skincare/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/skinmedica/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/vivier/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/zo-skin-health/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/under-eye-fillers/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/cosmetic-injectable-fillers/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/dermal-fillers-edmonton/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lip-fillers-edmonton/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lash-enhancement-treatment/ → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/about/patient-financing/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/skincare/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/skinmedica/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/vivier/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/zo-skin-health/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/under-eye-fillers/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/cosmetic-injectable-fillers/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/dermal-fillers-edmonton/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lip-fillers-edmonton/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lash-enhancement-treatment/ → no permissions-policy
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • static.klaviyo.com (40 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
9 checks passed, 1 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 151 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set on 2 of 151 pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 151 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKCookie flags

    All 1 cookie carry Secure, HttpOnly and SameSite flags.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableForms over HTTPS

    No forms were found on the sampled pages.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.beautyrewind.ca

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.beautyrewind.ca from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.beautyrewind.ca?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.beautyrewind.ca. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.
www.beautyrewind.ca scan 2026-10-04-2258 | DIY SEO Hub