Scanned sites / www.beautyrewind.ca / 2026-10-05-2010
www.beautyrewind.ca scan from 10/5/2026, 8:10:41 PM
Scan 2026-10-05-2010
Scanned 10/5/2026, 8:10:41 PM, finished 10/5/2026, 8:23:51 PM. Found with openstreetmap overpass
Site: https://www.beautyrewind.ca/
Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.
On October 5, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 160 pages and 659 assets of www.beautyrewind.ca, starting from https://www.beautyrewind.ca/. It scored 84 out of 100, a good result. 8 of 22 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (71), meta descriptions (72), title tags (58); 6 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), title tags (−3.8), meta descriptions (−3.8). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 1 check was not run because the crawl fetched nothing for it. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.
Security review: Medium2 medium, 2 low and 2 info findings. See the security findings ↓
- Pages crawled
- 160
- Assets fetched
- 659
- Status
- Completed
- Checks with issues
- 8 of 22
819 of 825 discovered URLs were fetched, 1 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 95 link destinations on other sites have not been checked.
- Title tags58 issues58 of 148 pages have title issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−3.8 points
- Meta descriptions72 issues72 of 148 pages have meta description issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−3.8 points
- Headings3 issues3 of 148 pages have heading issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−0.1 points
- Broken linksOK0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
- Links to other sitesNot checkedNot checked: the crawl fetched nothing this check can look at.
- Redirects8 issues10 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.−0.2 points
- Non-200 responses10 noted10 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 9 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
- Rate limitedOKThe site did not rate limit the crawler.
- Indexability2 issues2 of 148 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 3 pages noindex by design. 2 noindex pages are listed in the sitemap, which asks search engines both to visit and to ignore them.−0.1 points
- Image alt textOK0 of 1950 image references have no alt attribute. 1154 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
- Heavy assets71 issues71 assets larger than 500 KB among 659 fetched assets.−6 points
- Orphan pages25 issues25 pages have no internal links pointing at them.−0.7 points
- Sitemap coverage32 issues9 sitemaps listing 145 URLs: 6 crawled pages missing, 1 listed URL broken or redirecting, 23 reachable only via the sitemap.−1.3 points
- Internal link counts7 notedInternal link counts for 151 pages; 7 worth a look.
- Thin contentOK0 of 148 pages have fewer than 200 words. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Duplicate contentOK0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
- URL formatOKAll 160 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
- Canonicals1 noted1 of 151 pages have a canonical worth checking.
- Robots directives151 noted151 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
- Anchor text14 noted14 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
- Title and heading structure32 noted32 of 148 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Image weight and alt length93 noted92 images over 100 KB; 1 with alt text over 100 characters.
- Response anomalies7 noted7 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
Where this scan sits among all scanned sites
2082 sites, median 79%, average 78%
www.beautyrewind.ca scores 84%, higher than 71% of the 2082 scanned sites. See the full ranking.
Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).
Internal link map
Loading the link map...
Fix plan
Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findingsThe site's SEO is generally good, but there are several issues to resolve that can improve visibility and user experience. Prioritize fixing redirects, title and meta description issues, and optimizing heavy assets.
- 1
Fix Redirects
Why: Improves user experience and search engine crawling.
How: Update redirects to direct users straight to the final destination without intermediate steps.
Checks: redirects
- 2
Address Title Tag Issues
Why: Enhances search engine rankings and click-through rates.
How: Revise short and long titles to within 30-60 characters; include primary keywords.
Checks: titles
- 3
Revise Meta Descriptions
Why: Increases click-through rates and improves SEO.
How: Create concise meta descriptions of 150-160 characters, incorporating main keywords.
Evidence: 22 pages have no meta description at all.
22 pages affected
Checks: meta-descriptions
- 4
Reduce Heavy Assets
Why: Improves page load speeds and user experience.
How: Compress images and stylesheets above 500 KB to reduce load times.
Evidence: 816 KB of stylesheet, loaded by 151 pages, so every visitor to any of them downloads it.
151 pages affected
Depends on: If it is a download rather than part of the page, weight matters less; move it out of the page instead.
Checks: heavy-assets
- 5
Fix Indexability Warnings
Why: Ensures that important pages are indexed correctly.
How: Remove pages with 'noindex' from the sitemap or update their indexing status.
Checks: indexability
- 6
Resolve Sitemap Coverage Issues
Why: Ensures all important pages are indexed.
How: Update sitemap to include missing pages and remove broken URLs.
Evidence: 23 URLs: only reachable via sitemap.
23 pages affected
Checks: sitemap-coverage
Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.
Security review
Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawlThe website lacks crucial security headers, exposing visitors to potential risks such as clickjacking and interception. Implementing recommended headers will significantly enhance security and user privacy.
- 0 high
- 2 medium
- 2 low
- 2 info
- 1
Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium
Why it matters: Without HSTS, a visitor using HTTP can be vulnerable to interception on the initial request.
Fix: Add the header `Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains` to all responses.
Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security
- 2
Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium
Why it matters: Lack of this header allows pages to be embedded in frames, posing clickjacking risks.
Fix: Set the header `X-Frame-Options: DENY` or use a CSP frame-ancestors directive.
Evidence: Clickjacking protection
- 3
Missing Referrer-Policy HeaderLow
Why it matters: Without this policy, full URLs can be sent to other sites, risking privacy.
Fix: Implement the header `Referrer-Policy: no-referrer` or a suitable policy.
Evidence: Referrer policy
- 4
Third-Party Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow
Why it matters: Scripts from other domains can be altered, compromising site security.
Fix: Consider using Subresource Integrity where feasible, or implement a Content-Security-Policy that restricts trusted sources.
Evidence: Third-party scripts
- 5
Missing Permissions-Policy HeaderInfo
Why it matters: Not limiting browser features could allow injected scripts to misuse them.
Fix: Add the header `Permissions-Policy: camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=()`.
Evidence: Permissions policy
- 6
Sensitive Paths in robots.txtInfo
Why it matters: The listed path (/wp-admin/) is public and could provide insights for attackers.
Fix: Restrict access to sensitive areas via server configuration rather than relying solely on robots.txt.
Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt
What the checks found
- FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium
No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/about/patient-financing/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/skincare/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/skinmedica/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/vivier/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/zo-skin-health/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/under-eye-fillers/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/cosmetic-injectable-fillers/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/dermal-fillers-edmonton/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lip-fillers-edmonton/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lash-enhancement-treatment/ → no strict-transport-security
- FoundClickjacking protectionMedium
2 of 151 HTML pages send x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/about/patient-financing/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/skincare/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/skinmedica/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/vivier/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/zo-skin-health/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/under-eye-fillers/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/cosmetic-injectable-fillers/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/dermal-fillers-edmonton/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lip-fillers-edmonton/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lash-enhancement-treatment/ → no x-frame-options
- FoundReferrer policyLow
No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/about/patient-financing/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/skincare/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/skinmedica/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/vivier/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/zo-skin-health/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/under-eye-fillers/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/cosmetic-injectable-fillers/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/dermal-fillers-edmonton/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lip-fillers-edmonton/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lash-enhancement-treatment/ → no referrer-policy
- FoundPermissions policyInfo
No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/about/patient-financing/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/skincare/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/skinmedica/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/vivier/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/zo-skin-health/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/under-eye-fillers/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/cosmetic-injectable-fillers/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/dermal-fillers-edmonton/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lip-fillers-edmonton/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lash-enhancement-treatment/ → no permissions-policy
- NoteThird-party scripts
Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)
- static.klaviyo.com (40 script tags)
- NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt
robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
9 checks passed, 1 not applicable
- OKHTTPS
All 151 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.
- OKContent Security Policy
A Content-Security-Policy is set on 2 of 151 pages.
- OKMIME sniffing protection
x-content-type-options is set on all 151 HTML pages.
- OKSoftware version disclosure
The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.
- OKCookie flags
All 1 cookie carry Secure, HttpOnly and SameSite flags.
- OKMixed content
No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.
- OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries
2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.
- OKKeys and secrets in page code
No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.
- OKExposed files and listings
None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.
- Not applicableForms over HTTPS
No forms were found on the sampled pages.
A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.
Sites scoring near www.beautyrewind.ca
Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.
- hair2dye4.ca85/100 · rank 451 · 41 pages
- fungwee.fusenv.com85/100 · rank 451 · 34 pages
- www.heritageparkdental.ca84/100 · rank 520 · 96 pages
- www.lakewooddentalclinic.com84/100 · rank 520 · 99 pages
- maronconstruction.com84/100 · rank 520 · 16 pages
- www.physiomira.com84/100 · rank 520 · 37 pages
This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.beautyrewind.ca from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.
Own www.beautyrewind.ca?
- Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
- Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.beautyrewind.ca. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.