Scanned sites / www.beautyrewind.ca / 2026-10-04-1358

www.beautyrewind.ca scan from 10/4/2026, 1:58:31 PM

Scan 2026-10-04-1358

Scanned 10/4/2026, 1:58:31 PM, finished 10/4/2026, 2:23:59 PM. Found with openstreetmap overpass

Site: https://www.beautyrewind.ca/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

80/ 100Good

On October 4, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 160 pages and 908 assets of www.beautyrewind.ca, starting from https://www.beautyrewind.ca/. It scored 80 out of 100, a good result. 9 of 23 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (143), links to other sites (15), meta descriptions (72); 6 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), links to other sites (−4), title tags (−3.8). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium2 medium, 2 low and 2 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
160
Assets fetched
908
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
9 of 23
CoverageComplete crawl

1,068 of 1,074 discovered URLs were fetched, 1 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 98 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags58 issues
    58 of 148 pages have title issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.8 points
  • Meta descriptions72 issues
    72 of 148 pages have meta description issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.8 points
  • Headings3 issues
    3 of 148 pages have heading issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.1 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites15 issues
    15 destinations answered with an error, 43 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 98 destinations checked.
    −4 points
  • Redirects8 issues
    10 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.2 points
  • Non-200 responses13 noted
    13 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 9 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability2 issues
    2 of 148 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 3 pages noindex by design. 2 noindex pages are listed in the sitemap, which asks search engines both to visit and to ignore them.
    −0.1 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 1950 image references have no alt attribute. 1154 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets143 issues
    143 assets larger than 500 KB among 908 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages25 issues
    25 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.7 points
  • Sitemap coverage32 issues
    9 sitemaps listing 145 URLs: 6 crawled pages missing, 1 listed URL broken or redirecting, 23 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −1.3 points
  • Internal link counts7 noted
    Internal link counts for 151 pages; 7 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 148 pages have fewer than 200 words. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL formatOK
    All 160 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • Canonicals1 noted
    1 of 151 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives151 noted
    151 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text14 noted
    14 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure32 noted
    32 of 148 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length93 noted
    92 images over 100 KB; 1 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies7 noted
    7 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2057 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.beautyrewind.ca scores 80%, higher than 50% of the 2057 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0521030%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 0 sites10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 0 sites15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 1 site28%: 0 sites29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 1 site36%: 2 sites37%: 2 sites38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 2 sites41%: 1 site42%: 0 sites43%: 0 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 4 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 4 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 6 sites55%: 8 sites56%: 5 sites57%: 11 sites58%: 14 sites59%: 7 sites60%: 11 sites61%: 9 sites62%: 18 sites63%: 18 sites64%: 19 sites65%: 35 sites66%: 27 sites67%: 40 sites68%: 33 sites69%: 28 sites70%: 37 sites71%: 55 sites72%: 65 sites73%: 57 sites74%: 61 sites75%: 74 sites76%: 80 sites77%: 79 sites78%: 95 sites79%: 84 sites80%: 103 sites81%: 101 sites82%: 101 sites83%: 91 sites84%: 88 sites85%: 68 sites86%: 71 sites87%: 67 sites88%: 67 sites89%: 49 sites90%: 35 sites91%: 42 sites92%: 24 sites93%: 18 sites94%: 15 sites95%: 7 sites96%: 5 sites97%: 9 sites98%: 1 site99%: 2 sites100%: 56 sites80% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis (rules v4). The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Several SEO issues were identified on your site, necessitating immediate attention to enhance performance. Key areas include fixing redirects, meta descriptions, and heavy assets. Follow these prioritized fixes for optimal results.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Ensure users access the correct pages directly and improve SEO efficiency.

    How: Remove unnecessary redirects and link directly to final URLs.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Improve Title Tags

    Why: Increase search visibility and attract clicks by optimizing titles.

    How: Revise titles to be concise, ideally between 30-60 characters.

    Checks: titles

  3. 3

    Optimize Meta Descriptions

    Why: Prevent truncation in search results, enhancing click-through rates.

    How: Adjust descriptions to be under 160 characters while retaining keyword relevance.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  4. 4

    Resolve Indexability Warnings

    Why: Ensure critical pages are indexed properly for search engines.

    How: Remove noindex from key pages in your sitemap to ensure they are indexed.

    Checks: indexability

  5. 5

    Reduce Heavy Assets

    Why: Improve page load speed, benefiting user experience and SEO.

    How: Compress images/stylesheets larger than 500 KB to enhance loading times.

    Checks: heavy-assets

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website has some important security gaps that need addressing, particularly with HTTP Strict Transport Security and Clickjacking protection. Fixing these issues will enhance user safety and data protection significantly.

  • 0 high
  • 2 medium
  • 2 low
  • 2 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users can be intercepted when accessing the site without HTTPS.

    Fix: Add the header 'Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload' to all HTML pages.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Lack of Clickjacking ProtectionMedium

    Why it matters: Pages can be embedded in frames, risking clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Implement the header 'X-Frame-Options: DENY' or use 'Content-Security-Policy: frame-ancestors 'none'' on all HTML pages.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  3. 3

    No Referrer Policy SetLow

    Why it matters: Without a Referrer Policy, sensitive URLs can be leaked to external sites.

    Fix: Include the header 'Referrer-Policy: no-referrer' in all HTML pages.

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  4. 4

    Third-party Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from other domains can be compromised, leading to potential issues.

    Fix: Consider implementing a Content-Security-Policy to allow only trusted scripts or use Subresource Integrity where possible.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  5. 5

    Missing Permissions PolicyInfo

    Why it matters: Not restricting browser features could expose users to risks from malicious scripts.

    Fix: Add 'Permissions-Policy: interest-cohort=()' to all HTML pages.

    Evidence: Permissions policy

  6. 6

    Sensitive Paths in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: Public access to 'robots.txt' exposes potential internal paths.

    Fix: Ensure that sensitive directories like '/wp-admin/' are properly secured with access controls.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/about/patient-financing/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/skincare/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/skinmedica/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/vivier/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/zo-skin-health/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/under-eye-fillers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/cosmetic-injectable-fillers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/dermal-fillers-edmonton/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lip-fillers-edmonton/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lash-enhancement-treatment/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    2 of 151 HTML pages send x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/about/patient-financing/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/skincare/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/skinmedica/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/vivier/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/zo-skin-health/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/under-eye-fillers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/cosmetic-injectable-fillers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/dermal-fillers-edmonton/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lip-fillers-edmonton/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lash-enhancement-treatment/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/about/patient-financing/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/skincare/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/skinmedica/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/vivier/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/zo-skin-health/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/under-eye-fillers/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/cosmetic-injectable-fillers/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/dermal-fillers-edmonton/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lip-fillers-edmonton/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lash-enhancement-treatment/ → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/about/patient-financing/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/skincare/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/skinmedica/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/vivier/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/zo-skin-health/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/under-eye-fillers/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/cosmetic-injectable-fillers/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/dermal-fillers-edmonton/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lip-fillers-edmonton/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lash-enhancement-treatment/ → no permissions-policy
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • static.klaviyo.com (40 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
9 checks passed, 1 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 151 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set on 2 of 151 pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 151 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKCookie flags

    All 1 cookie carry Secure, HttpOnly and SameSite flags.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableForms over HTTPS

    No forms were found on the sampled pages.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.beautyrewind.ca

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.beautyrewind.ca from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.beautyrewind.ca?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.beautyrewind.ca. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.
www.beautyrewind.ca scan 2026-10-04-1358 | DIY SEO Hub