Scanned sites / www.advocateslaw.com / 2026-11-11-0433

www.advocateslaw.com scan from 2026-11-11 04:33:44 UTC DR 32

A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.advocateslaw.com.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-11-11-0433

Scanned 2026-11-11 04:33:44 UTC, finished 2026-11-11 07:42:36 UTC. Found with openstreetmap overpass

Site: https://www.advocateslaw.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

82/ 100Good

On November 11, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 556 pages and 334 assets of www.advocateslaw.com, starting from https://www.advocateslaw.com/. It scored 82 out of 100, a good result. 13 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (10), meta descriptions (304), title tags (202); 7 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), meta descriptions (−4.8), title tags (−4). 13 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium5 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
556
Assets fetched
334
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
13 of 33
CoverageComplete crawl

890 of 890 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 300 link destinations on other sites were checked, 317 left unchecked.

  • Title tags202 issues
    202 of 431 pages have title issues. 73 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4 points
  • Meta descriptions304 issues
    304 of 431 pages have meta description issues. 73 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.8 points
  • Headings4 issues
    4 of 431 pages have heading issues. 73 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Broken links7 issues
    31 internal links point at 7 broken URLs.
    −0.3 points
  • Links to other sites3 issues
    3 destinations answered with an error, 52 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 317 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
    −0.2 points
  • Redirects46 issues
    49 redirecting URLs, 18 of them chained.
    −0.4 points
  • Non-200 responses8 issues
    58 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 52 of them are pages, 8 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.2 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability44 issues
    44 of 451 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 53 pages noindex by design.
    −0.9 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 2439 image references have no alt attribute. 677 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets10 issues
    10 assets larger than 500 KB among 334 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages1 issue
    1 page have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage109 issues
    9 sitemaps listing 337 URLs: 101 crawled pages missing, 6 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 2 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −1.3 points
  • Internal link counts105 noted
    Internal link counts for 500 pages; 105 worth a look.
  • Thin content3 issues
    3 of 431 pages have fewer than 200 words. 73 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate content8 issues
    1 group of pages with identical HTML.
    −0.1 points
  • URL format18 noted
    18 of 556 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals73 noted
    73 of 504 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives497 noted
    497 pages carry a robots directive; 7 carry none.
  • Anchor text92 noted
    92 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure161 noted
    161 of 431 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 73 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length118 noted
    91 images over 100 KB; 27 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies2 noted
    2 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationOK
    All 504 pages keep their head tags in <head>, once each, under Googlebot's 2 MB.
  • hreflangOK
    No page declares hreflang.
  • Structured data21 noted
    502 of 431 indexable pages carry structured data: WebSite (501), BreadcrumbList (500), ListItem (500), https://www.schema.org/SiteNavigationElement (499), LegalService (308). 21 pages with errors a rich result would fail on.
  • Near duplicates44 noted
    44 pages in 22 groups read almost the same as another page (95% alike or more).
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 504 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positions69 noted
    69 of 430 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
  • Pagination20 noted
    230 pages in pagination sequences; 20 with problems.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    2 cookies set by the site; 13 response headers recorded across 890 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 504 pages; 293 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • Spelling92 noted
    92 words an English dictionary does not know, on 223 pages. Product names and jargon will appear here too.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2891 sites, median 80%, average 79%

www.advocateslaw.com scores 82%, higher than 56% of the 2891 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0761520%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 10 sites55%: 10 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 43 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 54 sites70%: 47 sites71%: 80 sites72%: 77 sites73%: 82 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 132 sites79%: 113 sites80%: 129 sites81%: 123 sites82%: 134 sites83%: 121 sites84%: 130 sites85%: 105 sites86%: 96 sites87%: 94 sites88%: 82 sites89%: 73 sites90%: 57 sites91%: 60 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 30 sites94%: 26 sites95%: 16 sites96%: 18 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 8 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 152 sites82% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Some urgent issues were found during the site crawl, particularly with broken links and redirects. Fixing these will improve user experience and SEO. Other enhancements include correcting title and meta description issues.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Broken links hinder user experience and SEO rankings.

    How: Update or remove links that are returning 404 errors.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Redirect Chains

    Why: Redirect chains can slow down the site and hurt SEO.

    How: Simplify the redirect paths to avoid chaining.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Address Non-200 Responses

    Why: Non-200 responses can hurt indexing and user access.

    How: Fix or remove pages and assets that are not returning a 2xx status.

    Checks: status-codes

  4. 4

    Improve Title Tags

    Why: Proper title tags enhance click-through rates and SEO.

    How: Revise title tags to ensure they are unique and within optimal character limits.

    Checks: titles

  5. 5

    Enhance Meta Descriptions

    Why: Meta descriptions are crucial for click-through rates from search results.

    How: Create unique, concise meta descriptions for all pages missing them.

    Evidence: 175 pages have no meta description at all.

    175 pages affected

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  6. 6

    Optimize Heavy Assets

    Why: Large assets can slow down page load times, affecting UX.

    How: Compress images and minimize stylesheets to improve performance.

    Evidence: 478 KB of stylesheet, loaded by 501 pages, so every visitor to any of them downloads it.

    501 pages affected

    Depends on: If it is a download rather than part of the page, weight matters less; move it out of the page instead.

    Checks: heavy-assets

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website has multiple security issues that could expose user data and functionality. Key areas needing attention include missing security headers, vulnerable libraries, and unprotected cookies. Implementing the recommended changes will enhance your site’s resilience against threats.

  • 0 high
  • 5 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HSTS HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without the HSTS header, initial HTTP requests can be intercepted.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000;

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: Absence of a CSP allows unrestricted script and frame sources, increasing risk of attacks.

    Fix: Implement a Content-Security-Policy header with trusted sources.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without this header, your site can be embedded in an iframe, increasing clickjacking risks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY;

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Cookies Lack Security FlagsMedium

    Why it matters: Cookies without Secure, HttpOnly, and SameSite flags are vulnerable to interception and CSRF.

    Fix: Set cookies with: HttpOnly, Secure, SameSite=Strict;

    Evidence: Cookie flags

  5. 5

    Vulnerable JavaScript Library DetectedMedium

    Why it matters: jQuery 3.2.2 has known vulnerabilities, potentially exploitable based on usage.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to version 3.5.0 or later.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  6. 6

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Lack of this header allows browsers to misinterpret files, leading to security issues.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff;

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  7. 7

    Missing Referrer-Policy HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this, full URLs are sent to every site users visit from yours, risking privacy.

    Fix: Add the header: Referrer-Policy: no-referrer;

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  8. 8

    Missing Permissions-Policy HeaderInfo

    Why it matters: Not defining features can leave you vulnerable to injected scripts having broader access.

    Fix: Add the header: Permissions-Policy: geolocation=(self), microphone=(), camera=();

    Evidence: Permissions policy

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/seattle/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 504 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/seattle/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/seattle/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/seattle/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/seattle/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/seattle/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no permissions-policy
  • FoundCookie flagsMedium

    720 of 722 cookies are missing protective flags. Without HttpOnly a script can read the cookie; without Secure it travels over plain HTTP; without SameSite it is sent on cross-site requests.

    • 11 Nov 2026 05:03:58 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 11 Nov 2026 07:21:37 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/sitemap.xml) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 11 Nov 2026 05:04:03 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/seattle/) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 11 Nov 2026 05:04:46 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 11 Nov 2026 05:05:13 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 11 Nov 2026 05:05:49 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 11 Nov 2026 05:05:56 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 11 Nov 2026 05:06:05 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 11 Nov 2026 05:06:15 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 11 Nov 2026 05:06:53 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 11 Nov 2026 05:06:58 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 11 Nov 2026 05:07:04 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 3.2.2. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 3.2.2 in https://www.advocateslaw.com/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/js/placeholders.jq…: CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • NoteSoftware version disclosure

    Responses name the framework in an X-Powered-By header but hide the version.

    • server: cloudflare (890 responses)
    • x-powered-by: WP Engine (550 responses)
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • widget.reviewability.com (5 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 8 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
5 checks passed
  • OKHTTPS

    All 504 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    78 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.advocateslaw.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.advocateslaw.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.advocateslaw.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.advocateslaw.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.