Scanned sites / www.advocateslaw.com / 2026-11-10-1518

www.advocateslaw.com scan from 2026-11-10 15:18:43 UTC DR 32

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-11-10-1518

Scanned 2026-11-10 15:18:43 UTC, finished 2026-11-10 18:32:42 UTC. Found with openstreetmap overpass

Site: https://www.advocateslaw.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

82/ 100Good

On November 10, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 555 pages and 334 assets of www.advocateslaw.com, starting from https://www.advocateslaw.com/. It scored 82 out of 100, a good result. 12 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (10), meta descriptions (304), title tags (201); 8 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), meta descriptions (−4.8), title tags (−4). 13 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium5 medium and 2 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
555
Assets fetched
334
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
12 of 33
CoverageComplete crawl

889 of 889 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 300 link destinations on other sites were checked, 317 left unchecked.

  • Title tags201 issues
    201 of 430 pages have title issues. 73 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4 points
  • Meta descriptions304 issues
    304 of 430 pages have meta description issues. 73 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.8 points
  • Headings3 issues
    3 of 430 pages have heading issues. 73 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Broken links7 issues
    31 internal links point at 7 broken URLs.
    −0.3 points
  • Links to other sites4 issues
    4 destinations answered with an error, 52 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 317 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
    −0.3 points
  • Redirects46 issues
    49 redirecting URLs, 18 of them chained.
    −0.4 points
  • Non-200 responses8 issues
    58 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 52 of them are pages, 8 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.2 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability44 issues
    44 of 450 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 53 pages noindex by design.
    −0.9 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 2435 image references have no alt attribute. 677 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets10 issues
    10 assets larger than 500 KB among 334 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage108 issues
    9 sitemaps listing 336 URLs: 101 crawled pages missing, 6 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 1 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −1.3 points
  • Internal link counts105 noted
    Internal link counts for 500 pages; 105 worth a look.
  • Thin content2 issues
    2 of 430 pages have fewer than 200 words. 73 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate content8 issues
    1 group of pages with identical HTML.
    −0.1 points
  • URL format18 noted
    18 of 555 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals73 noted
    73 of 503 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives497 noted
    497 pages carry a robots directive; 6 carry none.
  • Anchor text92 noted
    92 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure159 noted
    159 of 430 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 73 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length118 noted
    91 images over 100 KB; 27 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies2 noted
    2 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationOK
    All 503 pages keep their head tags in <head>, once each, under Googlebot's 2 MB.
  • hreflangOK
    No page declares hreflang.
  • Structured data20 noted
    501 of 430 indexable pages carry structured data: WebSite (500), BreadcrumbList (499), ListItem (499), https://www.schema.org/SiteNavigationElement (498), LegalService (307). 20 pages with errors a rich result would fail on.
  • Near duplicates44 noted
    44 pages in 22 groups read almost the same as another page (95% alike or more).
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 503 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positions69 noted
    69 of 430 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
  • Pagination20 noted
    230 pages in pagination sequences; 20 with problems.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    2 cookies set by the site; 13 response headers recorded across 889 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 503 pages; 291 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • Spelling92 noted
    92 words an English dictionary does not know, on 223 pages. Product names and jargon will appear here too.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2890 sites, median 80%, average 79%

www.advocateslaw.com scores 82%, higher than 56% of the 2890 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0761520%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 10 sites55%: 10 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 43 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 54 sites70%: 47 sites71%: 80 sites72%: 77 sites73%: 82 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 132 sites79%: 112 sites80%: 130 sites81%: 124 sites82%: 133 sites83%: 119 sites84%: 131 sites85%: 105 sites86%: 95 sites87%: 95 sites88%: 82 sites89%: 73 sites90%: 57 sites91%: 60 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 30 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 16 sites96%: 19 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 8 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 152 sites82% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Your site has several SEO issues that need addressing. Focus on fixing broken links, improving redirects, optimizing title tags and meta descriptions, and resolving indexability warnings for optimal performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Removing broken links improves user experience and SEO ranking.

    How: Identify the broken URLs through the provided list and either update the links or remove them.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Reduce Redirects

    Why: Minimizing redirects improves page speed and user experience.

    How: Review the redirect chains and redirect to the final destination URL directly where feasible.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: Proper title tags improve search visibility and click-through rates.

    How: Revise the identified titles to be unique and within recommended character limits.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: Unique, clear meta descriptions enhance click-through rates from search results.

    How: Create or revise meta descriptions for the specified pages to ensure they are descriptive and unique.

    Evidence: 174 pages have no meta description at all.

    174 pages affected

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Address Indexability Issues

    Why: Ensuring all relevant pages are indexable is crucial for visibility.

    How: Investigate indexability warnings and modify the robots.txt or meta tags as needed.

    Checks: indexability

  6. 6

    Shrink Heavy Assets

    Why: Reducing asset size enhances site speed and performance.

    How: Compress or resize the listed heavy assets to improve load times.

    Evidence: 478 KB of stylesheet, loaded by 500 pages, so every visitor to any of them downloads it.

    500 pages affected

    Depends on: If it is a download rather than part of the page, weight matters less; move it out of the page instead.

    Checks: heavy-assets

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website lacks essential security headers and protections, making it vulnerable to various attacks and privacy concerns. Immediate implementation of these measures is necessary to safeguard user data and improve site security.

  • 0 high
  • 5 medium
  • 2 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, visitors are vulnerable to man-in-the-middle attacks when accessing the site via HTTP.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Absence of Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Lack of CSP allows malicious scripts to execute, increasing risk of XSS attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    No X-Frame-Options for Clickjacking ProtectionMedium

    Why it matters: Without this header, the site can be embedded in malicious frames, allowing clickjacking.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Insecure Cookie FlagsMedium

    Why it matters: Most cookies are missing Secure, HttpOnly, and SameSite flags, risking exposure to attacks.

    Fix: Set cookies with: Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite=Strict

    Evidence: Cookie flags

  5. 5

    Vulnerable JavaScript Library DetectedMedium

    Why it matters: Using jQuery 3.2.2 exposes the site to known vulnerabilities that could be exploited.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to at least version 3.5.0.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  6. 6

    Missing X-Content-Type-OptionsLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers can erroneously interpret files, risking potential attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  7. 7

    No Referrer Policy SetLow

    Why it matters: Lack of a referrer policy may expose sensitive URL information when users navigate away from the site.

    Fix: Add the header: Referrer-Policy: no-referrer

    Evidence: Referrer policy

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/seattle/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 503 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/seattle/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/seattle/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/seattle/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/seattle/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/seattle/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no permissions-policy
  • FoundCookie flagsMedium

    655 of 657 cookies are missing protective flags. Without HttpOnly a script can read the cookie; without Secure it travels over plain HTTP; without SameSite it is sent on cross-site requests.

    • 10 Nov 2026 15:48:54 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 10 Nov 2026 17:49:00 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/sitemap.xml) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 10 Nov 2026 15:49:05 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/seattle/) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 10 Nov 2026 15:49:23 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 10 Nov 2026 15:49:39 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 10 Nov 2026 15:49:46 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 10 Nov 2026 15:50:00 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 10 Nov 2026 15:50:13 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 10 Nov 2026 15:50:41 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 10 Nov 2026 15:51:00 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 10 Nov 2026 15:51:06 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 10 Nov 2026 15:51:16 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 3.2.2. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 3.2.2 in https://www.advocateslaw.com/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/js/placeholders.jq…: CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • NoteSoftware version disclosure

    Responses name the framework in an X-Powered-By header but hide the version.

    • server: cloudflare (889 responses)
    • x-powered-by: WP Engine (549 responses)
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • widget.reviewability.com (5 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 8 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
5 checks passed
  • OKHTTPS

    All 503 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    78 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.advocateslaw.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.advocateslaw.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.advocateslaw.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.advocateslaw.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.