Scanned sites / www.advocateslaw.com / 2026-11-07-1924
www.advocateslaw.com scan from 2026-11-07 19:24:25 UTC DR 32
A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.advocateslaw.com.
DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.
Scan 2026-11-07-1924
Scanned 2026-11-07 19:24:25 UTC, finished 2026-11-08 00:12:24 UTC. Found with openstreetmap overpass
Site: https://www.advocateslaw.com/
Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.
On November 7, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 555 pages and 334 assets of www.advocateslaw.com, starting from https://www.advocateslaw.com/. It scored 82 out of 100, a good result. 12 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (10), meta descriptions (303), title tags (201); 8 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), meta descriptions (−4.8), title tags (−4). 13 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.
Security review: Medium5 medium and 2 low findings. See the security findings ↓
- Pages crawled
- 555
- Assets fetched
- 334
- Status
- Completed
- Checks with issues
- 12 of 33
889 of 889 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 300 link destinations on other sites were checked, 310 left unchecked.
- Title tags201 issues201 of 429 pages have title issues. 73 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−4 points
- Meta descriptions303 issues303 of 429 pages have meta description issues. 73 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−4.8 points
- Headings3 issues3 of 429 pages have heading issues. 73 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Broken links8 issues32 internal links point at 8 broken URLs.−0.3 points
- Links to other sites2 issues2 destinations answered with an error, 57 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 310 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.−0.2 points
- Redirects45 issues49 redirecting URLs, 18 of them chained.−0.4 points
- Non-200 responses9 issues59 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 53 of them are pages, 9 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.−0.2 points
- Rate limitedOKThe site did not rate limit the crawler.
- Indexability44 issues44 of 449 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 53 pages noindex by design.−0.9 points
- Image alt textOK0 of 2431 image references have no alt attribute. 677 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
- Heavy assets10 issues10 assets larger than 500 KB among 334 fetched assets.−6 points
- Orphan pagesOK0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
- Sitemap coverage109 issues9 sitemaps listing 336 URLs: 101 crawled pages missing, 7 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 1 reachable only via the sitemap.−1.3 points
- Internal link counts105 notedInternal link counts for 500 pages; 105 worth a look.
- Thin content2 issues2 of 429 pages have fewer than 200 words. 73 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Duplicate content9 issues1 group of pages with identical HTML.−0.1 points
- URL format18 noted18 of 555 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
- Canonicals73 noted73 of 502 pages have a canonical worth checking.
- Robots directives496 noted496 pages carry a robots directive; 6 carry none.
- Anchor text91 noted91 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
- Title and heading structure159 noted159 of 429 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 73 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Image weight and alt length118 noted91 images over 100 KB; 27 with alt text over 100 characters.
- Response anomalies2 noted2 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
- HTML and head validationOKAll 502 pages keep their head tags in <head>, once each, under Googlebot's 2 MB.
- hreflangOKNo page declares hreflang.
- Structured data20 noted500 of 429 indexable pages carry structured data: WebSite (499), BreadcrumbList (498), ListItem (498), https://www.schema.org/SiteNavigationElement (497), LegalService (307). 20 pages with errors a rich result would fail on.
- Near duplicates44 noted44 pages in 22 groups read almost the same as another page (95% alike or more).
- Soft 404sOKNone of 502 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
- AccessibilityNot checkedNot checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
- Link positions69 noted69 of 429 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
- Pagination20 noted230 pages in pagination sequences; 20 with problems.
- Headers and cookiesOK2 cookies set by the site; 13 response headers recorded across 889 URLs.
- Orphans in searchNot checkedNot checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
- Link ScoreOKLink Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 502 pages; 291 hold almost none (10 or less).
- JavaScript renderingNot checkedNot checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
- PageSpeed InsightsNot checkedNot checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
- Spelling91 noted91 words an English dictionary does not know, on 223 pages. Product names and jargon will appear here too.
Where this scan sits among all scanned sites
2877 sites, median 80%, average 79%
www.advocateslaw.com scores 82%, higher than 56% of the 2877 scanned sites. See the full ranking.
Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).
Internal link map
Loading the link map...
Fix plan
Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findingsThere are several high-impact fixes needed for your site related to broken links, redirects, non-200 responses, meta descriptions, and heavy assets. These changes will improve user experience and SEO performance significantly.
- 1
Fix Broken Links
Why: Improving broken links ensures users can access all content on the site.
How: Identify and replace or remove the broken URLs in the internal links.
Checks: broken-links
- 2
Reduce Redirects
Why: Reducing the number of redirects speeds up page load times and improves user experience.
How: Eliminate chained redirects by updating internal links to point directly to the final destination.
Checks: redirects
- 3
Address Non-200 Responses
Why: Fixing URLs that return errors will improve user accessibility and SEO health.
How: Investigate pages with non-200 responses and either correct the links or remove the faulty content.
Checks: status-codes
- 4
Improve Meta Descriptions
Why: Adding unique meta descriptions improves click-through rates from search results.
How: Create and implement custom meta descriptions for the 173 pages missing them.
Evidence: 173 pages have no meta description at all.
173 pages affected
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/ads/motor-vehicle-accident/
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/ads/seattle/
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/auburn/auburn-dog-bite-attorney/
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/auburn/auburn-motorcycle-accident-lawyer/
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/auburn/auburn-pedestrian-accident-attorney/
Checks: meta-descriptions
- 5
Shrink Heavy Assets
Why: Optimizing large assets will speed up load times and improve performance.
How: Compress and/or serve resized images to reduce their file size.
Evidence: 478 KB of stylesheet, loaded by 499 pages, so every visitor to any of them downloads it.
499 pages affected
Depends on: If it is a download rather than part of the page, weight matters less; move it out of the page instead.
Checks: heavy-assets
- 6
Fix Heading Issues
Why: Correcting multiple H1 tags improves content clarity for search engines.
How: Adjust the HTML to have a single H1 per page, enhancing structure.
Checks: headings
Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.
Security review
Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawlThe site lacks critical security headers and uses outdated libraries, exposing it to various vulnerabilities. Immediate implementation of security headers and an upgrade of libraries is recommended to enhance protection.
- 0 high
- 5 medium
- 2 low
- 0 info
- 1
Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium
Why it matters: Without HSTS, visitors can be intercepted when accessing the site over HTTP.
Fix: Add 'Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload' to your HTTP response headers.
Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security
- 2
Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium
Why it matters: The absence of a CSP allows scripts and resources to load from any source, increasing XSS risk.
Fix: Add 'Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';' to your HTTP response headers.
Evidence: Content Security Policy
- 3
No X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium
Why it matters: The lack of this header makes the site vulnerable to clickjacking attacks.
Fix: Add 'X-Frame-Options: DENY' to your HTTP response headers.
Evidence: Clickjacking protection
- 4
Cookies Missing Security FlagsMedium
Why it matters: Cookies without security flags are vulnerable to attacks like XSS.
Fix: Set cookies with 'Secure', 'HttpOnly', and 'SameSite' flags.
Evidence: Cookie flags
- 5
Outdated jQuery VersionMedium
Why it matters: Using jQuery 3.2.2 exposes the site to known vulnerabilities.
Fix: Upgrade jQuery to version 3.5.0 or higher.
Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries
- 6
Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow
Why it matters: Without this header, browsers may misinterpret file types, leading to security issues.
Fix: Add 'X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff' to your HTTP response headers.
Evidence: MIME sniffing protection
- 7
Missing Referrer Policy HeaderLow
Why it matters: Lack of this header can expose sensitive URL data to external sites.
Fix: Add 'Referrer-Policy: no-referrer' to your HTTP response headers.
Evidence: Referrer policy
What the checks found
- FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium
No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/seattle/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no strict-transport-security
- FoundContent Security PolicyMedium
None of the 502 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/seattle/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no content-security-policy
- FoundClickjacking protectionMedium
No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/seattle/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no x-frame-options
- FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow
No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/seattle/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no x-content-type-options
- FoundReferrer policyLow
No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/seattle/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no referrer-policy
- FoundPermissions policyInfo
No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/seattle/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no permissions-policy
- FoundCookie flagsMedium
549 of 551 cookies are missing protective flags. Without HttpOnly a script can read the cookie; without Secure it travels over plain HTTP; without SameSite it is sent on cross-site requests.
- 07 Nov 2026 23:01:17 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/sitemap.xml) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
- 07 Nov 2026 23:22:06 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/advo_hero-1024x576.webp) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
- 07 Nov 2026 23:22:35 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/sitemap_index.xml) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
- 07 Nov 2026 23:23:06 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/1-e1767647760461.webp) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
- 07 Nov 2026 20:23:05 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/spokane-about/) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
- 07 Nov 2026 20:23:25 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/?page_id=8674) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
- 07 Nov 2026 20:24:35 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/spokane-truck-accident-attorney/) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
- 07 Nov 2026 20:29:43 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/?page_id=8695) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
- 07 Nov 2026 23:23:39 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/17-3.jpg) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
- 07 Nov 2026 20:31:41 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/areas-de-practica/) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
- 07 Nov 2026 20:31:47 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/?post_type=practices&p=8763) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
- 07 Nov 2026 20:32:04 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/?post_type=practices&p=8764) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
- FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium
1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 3.2.2. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.
- jQuery 3.2.2 in https://www.advocateslaw.com/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/js/placeholders.jq…: CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
- NoteSoftware version disclosure
Responses name the framework in an X-Powered-By header but hide the version.
- server: cloudflare (889 responses)
- x-powered-by: WP Engine (549 responses)
- NoteThird-party scripts
Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)
- www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
- widget.reviewability.com (5 script tags)
- NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt
robots.txt lists 8 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
5 checks passed
- OKHTTPS
All 502 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.
- OKMixed content
No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.
- OKForms over HTTPS
78 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.
- OKKeys and secrets in page code
No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.
- OKExposed files and listings
None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.
A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.
Sites scoring near www.advocateslaw.com
Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.
- veprof.comDR 3383/100 · rank 1004 · 96 pages
- www.germanautomotive.caDR 1682/100 · rank 1124 · 182 pages
- www.furnasmanright-time.caDR 1182/100 · rank 1124 · 906 pages
- www.tsoralhealth.comDR 482/100 · rank 1124 · 43 pages
- mycalgarymechanic.caDR 1282/100 · rank 1124 · 110 pages
- www.healthsourcechiro.comDR 5482/100 · rank 1124 · 440 pages
DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.
This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.advocateslaw.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.
Own www.advocateslaw.com?
- Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
- Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.advocateslaw.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.