Scanned sites / www.advocateslaw.com / 2026-11-04-0029

www.advocateslaw.com scan from 2026-11-04 00:29:45 UTC DR 32

A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.advocateslaw.com.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-11-04-0029

Scanned 2026-11-04 00:29:45 UTC, finished 2026-11-04 20:02:48 UTC. Found with openstreetmap overpass

Site: https://www.advocateslaw.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

82/ 100Good

On November 4, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 568 pages and 338 assets of www.advocateslaw.com, starting from https://www.advocateslaw.com/. It scored 82 out of 100, a good result. 11 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (11), meta descriptions (302), title tags (200); 9 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), meta descriptions (−4.8), title tags (−4). 13 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium5 medium and 2 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
568
Assets fetched
338
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
11 of 33
CoverageComplete crawl

906 of 906 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 300 link destinations on other sites were checked, 312 left unchecked.

  • Title tags200 issues
    200 of 429 pages have title issues. 71 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4 points
  • Meta descriptions302 issues
    302 of 429 pages have meta description issues. 71 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.8 points
  • Headings3 issues
    3 of 429 pages have heading issues. 71 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Broken links10 issues
    50 internal links point at 10 broken URLs.
    −0.4 points
  • Links to other sites3 issues
    3 destinations answered with an error, 59 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 312 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
    −0.2 points
  • Redirects59 issues
    62 redirecting URLs, 18 of them chained.
    −0.5 points
  • Non-200 responses11 issues
    74 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 68 of them are pages, 11 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.2 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability44 issues
    44 of 449 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 51 pages noindex by design.
    −0.9 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 2377 image references have no alt attribute. 635 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets11 issues
    11 assets larger than 500 KB among 338 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage106 issues
    9 sitemaps listing 337 URLs: 99 crawled pages missing, 6 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 1 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −1.3 points
  • Internal link counts102 noted
    Internal link counts for 500 pages; 102 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 429 pages have fewer than 200 words. 71 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate content11 issues
    1 group of pages with identical HTML.
    −0.2 points
  • URL format18 noted
    18 of 568 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals71 noted
    71 of 500 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives494 noted
    494 pages carry a robots directive; 6 carry none.
  • Anchor text89 noted
    89 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure159 noted
    159 of 429 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 71 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length118 noted
    91 images over 100 KB; 27 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies2 noted
    2 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationOK
    All 500 pages keep their head tags in <head>, once each, under Googlebot's 2 MB.
  • hreflangOK
    No page declares hreflang.
  • Structured data20 noted
    498 of 429 indexable pages carry structured data: WebSite (497), BreadcrumbList (496), ListItem (496), https://www.schema.org/SiteNavigationElement (495), LegalService (306). 20 pages with errors a rich result would fail on.
  • Near duplicates38 noted
    38 pages in 19 groups read almost the same as another page (95% alike or more).
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 500 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positions68 noted
    68 of 429 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
  • Pagination20 noted
    229 pages in pagination sequences; 20 with problems.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    2 cookies set by the site; 13 response headers recorded across 906 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 500 pages; 298 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • Spelling91 noted
    91 words an English dictionary does not know, on 221 pages. Product names and jargon will appear here too.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2856 sites, median 80%, average 79%

www.advocateslaw.com scores 82%, higher than 56% of the 2856 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0741480%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 6 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 10 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 42 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 79 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 108 sites78%: 131 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 126 sites81%: 124 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 120 sites84%: 129 sites85%: 107 sites86%: 96 sites87%: 94 sites88%: 79 sites89%: 74 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 58 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 28 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 14 sites96%: 17 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 7 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 148 sites82% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Your site has a few important issues that need addressing, including broken links and multiple title and meta description problems. The highest impact will come from fixing these errors.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: 50 internal links point to broken URLs, impacting user experience and SEO.

    How: Identify and remove or update links to non-existent pages from the affected pages.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Redirect Chains

    Why: Chained redirects can slow down page loading and dilute link equity.

    How: Simplify redirects to make them direct, removing intermediary steps.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Address Title Tag Issues

    Why: 200 title tags have issues that can affect search ranking and clarity.

    How: Review and revise titles to meet best practices, ensuring they are unique and of appropriate length.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Fix Meta Description Issues

    Why: 302 pages lack optimized meta descriptions, which are critical for click-through rates.

    How: Create and add concise, relevant meta descriptions for these pages.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Fix Non-200 Responses

    Why: 74 URLs return non-200 responses, which can lead to lost traffic.

    How: Fix or remove URLs that lead to error statuses to ensure they return a 200 OK response.

    Checks: status-codes

  6. 6

    Shrink Heavy Assets

    Why: Reducing asset sizes will improve loading times across multiple pages.

    How: Compress or optimize large assets such as images and CSS files.

    Checks: heavy-assets

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website has multiple security vulnerabilities primarily due to missing key security headers and cookie protections. These issues can expose your site to risks such as data interception, cross-site scripting, and clickjacking. It's crucial to implement the recommended fixes to enhance your site's security.

  • 0 high
  • 5 medium
  • 2 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users can be vulnerable to interception when accessing your site via HTTP.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Lack of Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: A missing CSP permits scripts and resources from any source, increasing the risk of attacks.

    Fix: Implement a CSP header, e.g., Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline';

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    No X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without this header, pages are susceptible to clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add X-Frame-Options: DENY or X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN to your site headers.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Insufficient Cookie FlagsMedium

    Why it matters: Most cookies lack security flags, risking exposure and misuse by scripts.

    Fix: Set cookies with Secure, HttpOnly, and SameSite attributes. For example: Set-Cookie: mycookie=value; Secure; HttpOnly; SameSite=Lax.

    Evidence: Cookie flags

  5. 5

    Use of Vulnerable JavaScript LibrariesMedium

    Why it matters: Outdated libraries can lead to exploitable vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery from 3.2.1 to version 3.5.0 or later.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  6. 6

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers may incorrectly interpret file types, running malicious code.

    Fix: Add X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff to your site headers.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  7. 7

    Absence of Referrer PolicyLow

    Why it matters: Missing this policy may expose sensitive page URLs through referrer headers.

    Fix: Add Referrer-Policy: no-referrer-when-downgrade to your site headers.

    Evidence: Referrer policy

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/seattle/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 500 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/seattle/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/seattle/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/seattle/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/seattle/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/seattle/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no permissions-policy
  • FoundCookie flagsMedium

    12 of 14 cookies are missing protective flags. Without HttpOnly a script can read the cookie; without Secure it travels over plain HTTP; without SameSite it is sent on cross-site requests.

    • 04 Nov 2026 03:32:32 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/?page_id=8674) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 04 Nov 2026 03:57:22 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/?page_id=8695) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 04 Nov 2026 04:33:38 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/?post_type=practices&p=8763) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 04 Nov 2026 04:33:44 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/?post_type=practices&p=8764) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 04 Nov 2026 04:34:34 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/?post_type=practices&p=8767) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 04 Nov 2026 04:34:40 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/?post_type=practices&p=8765) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 04 Nov 2026 04:35:41 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/?post_type=practices&p=8766) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 04 Nov 2026 09:33:21 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/old-car-vs-new-car-saftey/) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 04 Nov 2026 09:35:45 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/washington-motorcycle-laws-what-you-need-to-know/) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 04 Nov 2026 13:09:58 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/back-injury-explainer/) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 04 Nov 2026 13:44:00 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/seattle-car-accident-lawyer/) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 04 Nov 2026 20:32:36 GMT (set by https://www.advocateslaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/AdobeStock_118584325-mi…) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 3.2.1. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 3.2.1 in https://www.advocateslaw.com/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/js/placeholders.jq…: CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • NoteSoftware version disclosure

    Responses name the framework in an X-Powered-By header but hide the version.

    • server: cloudflare (906 responses)
    • x-powered-by: WP Engine (562 responses)
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • widget.reviewability.com (2 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 8 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
5 checks passed
  • OKHTTPS

    All 500 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    79 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.advocateslaw.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.advocateslaw.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.advocateslaw.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.advocateslaw.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.