Scanned sites / www.advocateslaw.com / 2026-10-04-0806

www.advocateslaw.com scan from 10/4/2026, 8:06:28 AM

A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.advocateslaw.com.

Scan 2026-10-04-0806

Scanned 10/4/2026, 8:06:28 AM, finished 10/4/2026, 8:45:55 AM. Found with openstreetmap overpass

Site: https://www.advocateslaw.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

82/ 100Good

On October 4, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 497 pages and 953 assets of www.advocateslaw.com, starting from https://www.advocateslaw.com/. It scored 82 out of 100, a good result. 11 of 16 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (64), meta descriptions (256), title tags (159); 4 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), meta descriptions (−4.5), title tags (−3.5). 1 check found something the score does not count, listed as noted. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium4 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
497
Assets fetched
953
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
11 of 16
CoverageComplete crawl

1,450 of 1,450 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 300 link destinations on other sites were checked, 376 left unchecked.

  • Title tags159 issues
    159 of 382 pages have title issues. 71 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.5 points
  • Meta descriptions256 issues
    256 of 382 pages have meta description issues. 71 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.5 points
  • Headings3 issues
    3 of 382 pages have heading issues. 71 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Broken links7 issues
    77 internal links point at 7 broken URLs.
    −0.3 points
  • Links to other sites5 issues
    5 destinations answered with an error, 40 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 376 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
    −0.4 points
  • Redirects42 issues
    42 redirecting URLs, 15 of them chained.
    −0.4 points
  • Non-200 responses7 issues
    50 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 44 of them are pages, 7 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.2 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability44 issues
    44 of 402 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 51 pages noindex by design.
    −1 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 2182 image references have no alt attribute. 634 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets64 issues
    64 assets larger than 500 KB among 953 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage107 issues
    9 sitemaps listing 282 URLs: 103 crawled pages missing, 3 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 1 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −1.4 points
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 453 pages.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 382 pages have fewer than 200 words. 71 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate content7 issues
    1 group of pages with identical HTML.
    −0.1 points

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2057 sites, median 80%, average 78%

www.advocateslaw.com scores 82%, higher than 60% of the 2057 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0521040%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 0 sites10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 0 sites15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 2 sites38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 1 site41%: 2 sites42%: 0 sites43%: 1 site44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 4 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 2 sites49%: 4 sites50%: 4 sites51%: 4 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 7 sites56%: 5 sites57%: 7 sites58%: 15 sites59%: 6 sites60%: 11 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 16 sites63%: 20 sites64%: 18 sites65%: 31 sites66%: 23 sites67%: 41 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 26 sites70%: 42 sites71%: 51 sites72%: 64 sites73%: 55 sites74%: 55 sites75%: 76 sites76%: 83 sites77%: 76 sites78%: 96 sites79%: 83 sites80%: 104 sites81%: 101 sites82%: 104 sites83%: 87 sites84%: 86 sites85%: 74 sites86%: 74 sites87%: 69 sites88%: 65 sites89%: 51 sites90%: 37 sites91%: 43 sites92%: 27 sites93%: 18 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 7 sites96%: 7 sites97%: 8 sites98%: 1 site99%: 2 sites100%: 56 sites82% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

The site has several technical issues that need addressing to improve SEO performance. Prioritized actions include fixing broken links, addressing redirect issues, and optimizing meta descriptions. Implement these changes for better visibility and user experience.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Broken links hinder user experience and negatively affect SEO.

    How: Identify and replace or remove the 77 broken links listed. Ensure they point to valid URLs.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Reduce Redirect Chains

    Why: Chained redirects can slow down your site and confuse search engines.

    How: Simplify the 15 chained redirects to point directly to the final destination URLs.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Address Non-200 Responses

    Why: Non-200 responses can affect site accessibility and ranking.

    How: Resolve issues for the 50 URLs that returned non-200 responses. Focus on fixing or removing 7 broken pages.

    Checks: status-codes

  4. 4

    Optimize Meta Descriptions

    Why: Improving meta descriptions can enhance click-through rates in search results.

    How: Create unique meta descriptions for the 139 pages with missing or duplicate descriptions.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Fix Title Tag Issues

    Why: Optimizing title tags improves search rankings and relevance.

    How: Revise title tags for the 159 pages flagged for issues, ensuring uniqueness and appropriate length.

    Checks: titles

  6. 6

    Shrink Heavy Assets

    Why: Reducing heavy assets improves page load speed and user experience.

    How: Compress or optimize the 64 assets larger than 500 KB, focusing on those crucial for page speed.

    Evidence: 715 KB of image, loaded by 3 pages, so every visitor to any of them downloads it.

    3 pages affected

    Depends on: If it is a download rather than part of the page, weight matters less; move it out of the page instead.

    Checks: heavy-assets

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website has several security vulnerabilities, including missing important HTTP headers and outdated JavaScript libraries. Implementing a strict transport policy and content security policy is crucial for safeguarding user data and preventing attacks. Immediate action is recommended to mitigate these risks.

  • 0 high
  • 4 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users may be intercepted on initial requests when accessing the site without HTTPS.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Lack of a CSP allows arbitrary scripts to load, increasing the risk of XSS attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; script-src 'self';.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-OptionsMedium

    Why it matters: Without this header, the site could be vulnerable to clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Vulnerable JavaScript Library (jQuery 3.1.3)Medium

    Why it matters: This version has known vulnerabilities that could be exploited based on how the site uses the library.

    Fix: Upgrade to jQuery version 3.5.0 or higher.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  5. 5

    Missing X-Content-Type-OptionsLow

    Why it matters: This can lead to browsers incorrectly interpreting files and executing unwanted scripts.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  6. 6

    Missing Referrer-PolicyLow

    Why it matters: The absence of this policy may expose sensitive URL information when users navigate away from the site.

    Fix: Add the header: Referrer-Policy: no-referrer.

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  7. 7

    Missing Permissions PolicyInfo

    Why it matters: This header can limit the browser features that could be exploited by potential attackers.

    Fix: Add the header: Permissions-Policy: geolocation=(self), microphone=(), camera=().

    Evidence: Permissions policy

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 453 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/sea/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/spokane/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/portland/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/es/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/what-is-an-advocate/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/about-ken-and-doni/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/testimonials/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/community-involvement/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-results/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.advocateslaw.com/cases-we-handle/ → no permissions-policy
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 3.1.3. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 3.1.3 in https://www.advocateslaw.com/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/js/placeholders.jq…: CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • NoteSoftware version disclosure

    Responses name the framework in an X-Powered-By header but hide the version.

    • server: cloudflare (1450 responses)
    • x-powered-by: WP Engine (495 responses)
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • widget.reviewability.com (3 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 8 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
6 checks passed
  • OKHTTPS

    All 453 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKCookie flags

    All 1 cookie carry Secure, HttpOnly and SameSite flags.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    79 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.advocateslaw.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.advocateslaw.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.advocateslaw.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.advocateslaw.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.
www.advocateslaw.com scan 2026-10-04-0806 | DIY SEO Hub