Scanned sites / jdpelectric.net

SEO report for jdpelectric.net DR 10

The latest Site Spider scan of jdpelectric.net, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/jdpelectric-net/2026-09-11-2116.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-11 21:16:33 UTC, finished 2026-09-11 21:49:07 UTC

Site: https://jdpelectric.net/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

83/ 100Good

On September 11, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 252 pages and 529 assets of jdpelectric.net, starting from https://jdpelectric.net/. It scored 83 out of 100, a good result. 10 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (10), links to other sites (26), meta descriptions (53); 7 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), links to other sites (−4), meta descriptions (−2.4). 10 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium and 2 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
252
Assets fetched
529
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
10 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

781 of 781 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 94 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags29 issues
    29 of 74 pages have title issues. 105 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1.6 points
  • Meta descriptions53 issues
    53 of 74 pages have meta description issues. 105 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.4 points
  • Headings8 issues
    8 of 74 pages have heading issues. 105 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.3 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites26 issues
    26 destinations answered with an error, 39 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 94 destinations checked.
    −4 points
  • Redirects73 issues
    74 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −1.6 points
  • Non-200 responses80 noted
    80 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 73 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability6 issues
    6 of 80 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 99 pages noindex by design.
    −0.3 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 621 image references have no alt attribute. 109 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets10 issues
    10 assets larger than 500 KB among 529 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages2 issues
    2 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage2 issues
    3 sitemaps listing 74 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 2 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.1 points
  • Internal link counts112 noted
    Internal link counts for 179 pages; 112 worth a look.
  • Thin content6 issues
    6 of 74 pages have fewer than 200 words. 105 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.3 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format3 noted
    3 of 252 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals105 noted
    105 of 179 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives179 noted
    179 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text4 noted
    4 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure1 noted
    1 of 74 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 105 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length25 noted
    25 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies1 noted
    1 URL answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 179 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 12 response headers recorded across 781 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 179 pages; 147 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 71 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2347 sites, median 79%, average 78%

jdpelectric.net scores 83%, higher than 64% of the 2347 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581150%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 7 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 69 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 70 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 107 sites79%: 85 sites80%: 107 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 103 sites84%: 107 sites85%: 88 sites86%: 70 sites87%: 73 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 66 sites90%: 35 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 17 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 12 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 5 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 68 sites83% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website has several vulnerabilities related to security headers, which can expose users to issues like interception and clickjacking. It's crucial to implement protections like HSTS, CSP, and X-Frame-Options to enhance security.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 2 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users typing the URL without HTTPS can be intercepted on the first request.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains;

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Without a CSP, there's no restriction on where scripts and styles may load from, increasing risk of attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without X-Frame-Options, the site's pages can be embedded in a frame on another site, exposing users to clickjacking.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY;

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers might incorrectly interpret file types, leading to potential security issues.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff;

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Third-Party Scripts without Subresource Integrity (SRI)Low

    Why it matters: Scripts running from other domains can be altered, leading to potential malicious activity.

    Fix: Implement a Content-Security-Policy that specifies trusted script sources.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://jdpelectric.net/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://jdpelectric.net/contact-us/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://jdpelectric.net/residential/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://jdpelectric.net/commercial-electrical/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://jdpelectric.net/industrial-electricians/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://jdpelectric.net/electrical-projects/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://jdpelectric.net/bill-pay-invoice/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://jdpelectric.net/blog/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://jdpelectric.net/careers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://jdpelectric.net/payment-portal/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://jdpelectric.net/2023/09/electric-ranges-vs-gas-ranges-how-to-choose-for-your-kitchen/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://jdpelectric.net/category/blog/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 179 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://jdpelectric.net/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://jdpelectric.net/contact-us/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://jdpelectric.net/residential/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://jdpelectric.net/commercial-electrical/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://jdpelectric.net/industrial-electricians/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://jdpelectric.net/electrical-projects/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://jdpelectric.net/bill-pay-invoice/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://jdpelectric.net/blog/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://jdpelectric.net/careers/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://jdpelectric.net/payment-portal/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://jdpelectric.net/2023/09/electric-ranges-vs-gas-ranges-how-to-choose-for-your-kitchen/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://jdpelectric.net/category/blog/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://jdpelectric.net/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://jdpelectric.net/contact-us/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://jdpelectric.net/residential/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://jdpelectric.net/commercial-electrical/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://jdpelectric.net/industrial-electricians/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://jdpelectric.net/electrical-projects/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://jdpelectric.net/bill-pay-invoice/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://jdpelectric.net/blog/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://jdpelectric.net/careers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://jdpelectric.net/payment-portal/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://jdpelectric.net/2023/09/electric-ranges-vs-gas-ranges-how-to-choose-for-your-kitchen/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://jdpelectric.net/category/blog/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://jdpelectric.net/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://jdpelectric.net/contact-us/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://jdpelectric.net/residential/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://jdpelectric.net/commercial-electrical/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://jdpelectric.net/industrial-electricians/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://jdpelectric.net/electrical-projects/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://jdpelectric.net/bill-pay-invoice/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://jdpelectric.net/blog/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://jdpelectric.net/careers/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://jdpelectric.net/payment-portal/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://jdpelectric.net/2023/09/electric-ranges-vs-gas-ranges-how-to-choose-for-your-kitchen/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://jdpelectric.net/category/blog/ → no x-content-type-options
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • www.google.com (2 script tags)
8 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 179 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    12 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of jdpelectric.net

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near jdpelectric.net

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling jdpelectric.net from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own jdpelectric.net?