Scanned sites / protechsteel.com / 2026-09-14-0123

protechsteel.com scan from 2026-09-14 01:23:11 UTC DR 26

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-14-0123

Scanned 2026-09-14 01:23:11 UTC, finished 2026-09-14 02:00:39 UTC. Found on page 3 of brave web search results

Site: https://protechsteel.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

68/ 100Needs work

On September 14, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 35 pages and 998 assets of protechsteel.com, starting from https://protechsteel.com/. It scored 68 out of 100, a result that needs work. 11 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (25), heavy assets (95), sitemap coverage (25); 7 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−7.4), heavy assets (−6), sitemap coverage (−5.6). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
35
Assets fetched
998
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
11 of 27
CoverageJob finished, partial coverage

1,033 of 1,039 discovered URLs were fetched, 92 left out by the 5,000-page and 1,000-asset budget. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 14 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags10 issues
    10 of 25 pages have title issues. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.7 points
  • Meta descriptions25 issues
    25 of 25 pages have meta description issues. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −7.4 points
  • Headings21 issues
    21 of 25 pages have heading issues. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.7 points
  • Broken links2 issues
    48 internal links point at 2 broken URLs.
    −1.5 points
  • Links to other sites135 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 8 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 11 destinations checked.
  • Redirects6 issues
    7 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.9 points
  • Non-200 responses2 issues
    10 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 8 of them are pages, 2 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.7 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability1 issue
    1 of 26 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 1 page noindex by design.
    −0.4 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 547 image references have no alt attribute. 230 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets95 issues
    95 assets larger than 500 KB among 998 fetched assets. 19 documents over that size are listed but not counted: downloads are not page weight.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages3 issues
    3 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.4 points
  • Sitemap coverage25 issues
    1 sitemap listing 0 URLs: 25 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −5.6 points
  • Internal link counts2 noted
    Internal link counts for 27 pages; 2 worth a look.
  • Thin content2 issues
    2 of 25 pages have fewer than 200 words. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.6 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format12 noted
    12 of 35 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals2 noted
    2 of 27 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives27 noted
    27 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text5 noted
    5 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structureOK
    0 of 25 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length111 noted
    111 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies4 noted
    4 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 27 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 10 response headers recorded across 1033 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 27 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 49 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2873 sites, median 80%, average 79%

protechsteel.com scores 68%, higher than 13% of the 2873 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751500%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 43 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 80 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 132 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 128 sites81%: 125 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 119 sites84%: 130 sites85%: 106 sites86%: 95 sites87%: 96 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 75 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 59 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 29 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 15 sites96%: 18 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 8 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 150 sites68% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site has several SEO issues that need addressing, primarily around broken links, redirects, titles, meta descriptions, headings, and a problematic sitemap. These fixes will enhance your site's SEO health score significantly.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Broken links provide a poor user experience and affect your SEO.

    How: Locate the broken URLs ('https://protechsteel.com/LOGIN/') and either remove links to them or update to correct URLs.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Update Titles

    Why: Fixing titles can improve click-through rates and visibility in search results.

    How: Revise short titles (<30 characters) to be more descriptive and up to 60 characters, e.g., change 'About Us' to 'Learn About Protech Steel'.

    Checks: titles

  3. 3

    Add Meta Descriptions

    Why: Meta descriptions improve search visibility and click rates.

    How: Write unique meta descriptions for each page, ensuring they are under 160 characters and effectively summarize the content.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  4. 4

    Implement Headings

    Why: Proper headings improve content structure and SEO.

    How: Add H1 tags to pages missing them and ensure they are descriptive, e.g., for the homepage: 'Welcome to Protech Steel'.

    Checks: headings

  5. 5

    Fix Sitemap Coverage

    Why: A comprehensive sitemap aids in better indexing by search engines.

    How: Ensure all 25 crawled pages are listed in the sitemap, then re-submit to search engines.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

  6. 6

    Address Redirects

    Why: Minimizing redirects can improve site performance and user experience.

    How: Remove unnecessary redirects by linking directly to the final URL, e.g., from 'http://protechsteel.com/' to 'https://protechsteel.com/'.

    Checks: redirects

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The site has multiple security headers missing, exposing it to risks like interception and script injection. These issues should be addressed promptly to enhance security. Specifically, implement HSTS, CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options headers across all pages.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users connecting without HTTPS may be intercepted.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Lack of a CSP allows scripts and resources from any source, increasing XSS risk.

    Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-OptionsMedium

    Why it matters: Without this header, the site is vulnerable to clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-OptionsLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers may incorrectly interpret files, leading to security issues.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Use of Third-party Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from external domains could be compromised, affecting site security.

    Fix: Implement a CSP that specifies trusted sources or use Subresource Integrity where possible.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  6. 6

    Sensitive Paths in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The listed paths could reveal private site areas to attackers.

    Fix: Restrict access to sensitive paths through server-side authentication and remove them from robots.txt.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://protechsteel.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://protechsteel.com/panels/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://protechsteel.com/25_corrugated/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://protechsteel.com/lo-pro/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://protechsteel.com/board-batten/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://protechsteel.com/dutch-lap/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://protechsteel.com/5in-double/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://protechsteel.com/TUFF_RIB/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://protechsteel.com/rugged_rib/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://protechsteel.com/nail_strip/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://protechsteel.com/1-75_snap_lock/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://protechsteel.com/1-5_mech_lock/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 27 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://protechsteel.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://protechsteel.com/panels/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://protechsteel.com/25_corrugated/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://protechsteel.com/lo-pro/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://protechsteel.com/board-batten/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://protechsteel.com/dutch-lap/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://protechsteel.com/5in-double/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://protechsteel.com/TUFF_RIB/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://protechsteel.com/rugged_rib/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://protechsteel.com/nail_strip/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://protechsteel.com/1-75_snap_lock/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://protechsteel.com/1-5_mech_lock/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://protechsteel.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://protechsteel.com/panels/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://protechsteel.com/25_corrugated/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://protechsteel.com/lo-pro/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://protechsteel.com/board-batten/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://protechsteel.com/dutch-lap/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://protechsteel.com/5in-double/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://protechsteel.com/TUFF_RIB/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://protechsteel.com/rugged_rib/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://protechsteel.com/nail_strip/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://protechsteel.com/1-75_snap_lock/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://protechsteel.com/1-5_mech_lock/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://protechsteel.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://protechsteel.com/panels/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://protechsteel.com/25_corrugated/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://protechsteel.com/lo-pro/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://protechsteel.com/board-batten/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://protechsteel.com/dutch-lap/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://protechsteel.com/5in-double/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://protechsteel.com/TUFF_RIB/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://protechsteel.com/rugged_rib/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://protechsteel.com/nail_strip/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://protechsteel.com/1-75_snap_lock/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://protechsteel.com/1-5_mech_lock/ → no x-content-type-options
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (26 script tags)
    • cdnjs.cloudflare.com (3 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
7 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 27 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    57 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near protechsteel.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling protechsteel.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own protechsteel.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming protechsteel.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.