Scanned sites / peteselec.com / 2026-09-11-2051

peteselec.com scan from 2026-09-11 20:51:38 UTC DR 15

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-11-2051

Scanned 2026-09-11 20:51:38 UTC, finished 2026-09-11 21:10:14 UTC

Site: https://peteselec.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

76/ 100Good

On September 11, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 22 pages and 267 assets of peteselec.com, starting from https://peteselec.com/. It scored 76 out of 100, a good result. 12 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (12), headings (11), meta descriptions (8); 6 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), headings (−4.4), meta descriptions (−4.3). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
22
Assets fetched
267
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
12 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

289 of 289 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 4 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags2 issues
    2 of 14 pages have title issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −1.3 points
  • Meta descriptions8 issues
    8 of 14 pages have meta description issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −4.3 points
  • Headings11 issues
    11 of 14 pages have heading issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −4.4 points
  • Broken links2 issues
    4 internal links point at 2 broken URLs.
    −2.7 points
  • Links to other sites15 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 1 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 4 destinations checked.
  • Redirects5 issues
    6 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −1.3 points
  • Non-200 responses2 issues
    8 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 7 of them are pages, 2 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −1.3 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability1 issue
    1 of 15 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
    −0.7 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 151 image references have no alt attribute. 112 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets12 issues
    12 assets larger than 500 KB among 267 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages2 issues
    2 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.5 points
  • Sitemap coverage1 issue
    2 sitemaps listing 14 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 1 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.4 points
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 15 pages; none is a dead end or buried.
  • Thin content1 issue
    1 of 14 pages have fewer than 200 words. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −0.5 points
  • Duplicate content2 issues
    1 group of pages with identical HTML.
    −1.1 points
  • URL format3 noted
    3 of 22 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals1 noted
    1 of 15 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives15 noted
    15 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text1 noted
    1 destination are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure4 noted
    4 of 14 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length24 noted
    24 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies5 noted
    5 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 15 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 12 response headers recorded across 289 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 15 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 43 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2863 sites, median 80%, average 79%

peteselec.com scores 76%, higher than 32% of the 2863 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751490%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 42 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 79 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 108 sites78%: 131 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 127 sites81%: 124 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 121 sites84%: 130 sites85%: 107 sites86%: 94 sites87%: 94 sites88%: 81 sites89%: 75 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 58 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 28 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 14 sites96%: 18 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 7 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 149 sites76% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your site has several security headers missing that could expose it to attacks, such as man-in-the-middle attacks and content injection. Address these issues promptly to enhance your site's security.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users typing your URL may be intercepted on their first request.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: No CSP is defined, exposing the site to potential script injection from unauthorized sources.

    Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-OptionsMedium

    Why it matters: Without this header, your site can be loaded in frames on other sites, risking clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-OptionsLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers may incorrectly execute files as scripts based on their content.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Third-Party Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from external domains could be compromised, affecting your site’s security.

    Fix: Consider implementing Subresource Integrity (SRI) for scripts or a CSP that restricts these sources.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  6. 6

    Sensitive Path in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The robots.txt file discloses a sensitive path that could facilitate attacks if exploited.

    Fix: Restrict access to sensitive paths using server-side access controls.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://peteselec.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://peteselec.com/commercial-electrician-services/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://peteselec.com/residential-electrician-services/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://peteselec.com/electrical-repairs/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://peteselec.com/underground-break-locating/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://peteselec.com/panel-upgrades/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://peteselec.com/ev-charger-installation-missoula-mt/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://peteselec.com/lighting-installation-missoula-mt/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://peteselec.com/about/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://peteselec.com/electrician-missoula-mt/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://peteselec.com/portfolio/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://peteselec.com/gfci-troubleshooting/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 15 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://peteselec.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://peteselec.com/commercial-electrician-services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://peteselec.com/residential-electrician-services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://peteselec.com/electrical-repairs/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://peteselec.com/underground-break-locating/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://peteselec.com/panel-upgrades/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://peteselec.com/ev-charger-installation-missoula-mt/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://peteselec.com/lighting-installation-missoula-mt/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://peteselec.com/about/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://peteselec.com/electrician-missoula-mt/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://peteselec.com/portfolio/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://peteselec.com/gfci-troubleshooting/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://peteselec.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://peteselec.com/commercial-electrician-services/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://peteselec.com/residential-electrician-services/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://peteselec.com/electrical-repairs/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://peteselec.com/underground-break-locating/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://peteselec.com/panel-upgrades/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://peteselec.com/ev-charger-installation-missoula-mt/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://peteselec.com/lighting-installation-missoula-mt/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://peteselec.com/about/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://peteselec.com/electrician-missoula-mt/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://peteselec.com/portfolio/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://peteselec.com/gfci-troubleshooting/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://peteselec.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://peteselec.com/commercial-electrician-services/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://peteselec.com/residential-electrician-services/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://peteselec.com/electrical-repairs/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://peteselec.com/underground-break-locating/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://peteselec.com/panel-upgrades/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://peteselec.com/ev-charger-installation-missoula-mt/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://peteselec.com/lighting-installation-missoula-mt/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://peteselec.com/about/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://peteselec.com/electrician-missoula-mt/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://peteselec.com/portfolio/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://peteselec.com/gfci-troubleshooting/ → no x-content-type-options
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (15 script tags)
    • www.google.com (10 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
7 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 15 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    14 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near peteselec.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling peteselec.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own peteselec.com?