Scanned sites / luumsalon.com

SEO report for luumsalon.com DR 4

The latest Site Spider scan of luumsalon.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/luumsalon-com/2026-09-12-2007.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-12 20:07:01 UTC, finished 2026-09-12 21:03:23 UTC. Found on page 5 of brave web search results

Site: https://luumsalon.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

76/ 100Good

On September 12, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 5 pages and 301 assets of luumsalon.com, starting from https://luumsalon.com/. It scored 76 out of 100, a good result. 5 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (5), meta descriptions (5), sitemap coverage (3); 14 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−10), meta descriptions (−8), sitemap coverage (−3.6). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
5
Assets fetched
301
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
5 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

306 of 306 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 13 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags5 issues
    5 of 5 pages have title issues.
    −10 points
  • Meta descriptions5 issues
    5 of 5 pages have meta description issues.
    −8 points
  • HeadingsOK
    0 of 5 pages have heading issues.
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites34 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 11 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 13 destinations checked.
  • Redirects2 noted
    2 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responses5 noted
    5 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 0 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 5 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 47 image references have no alt attribute. 18 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets1 issue
    1 asset larger than 500 KB among 301 fetched assets.
    −0.6 points
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage3 issues
    No sitemap found. Tried: https://luumsalon.com/sitemap.xml (404), https://luumsalon.com/wp-sitemap.xml (404). Add one at /sitemap.xml or list it in robots.txt.
    −3.6 points
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 5 pages; none is a dead end or buried.
  • Thin content1 issue
    1 of 5 pages have fewer than 200 words.
    −1.6 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL formatOK
    All 5 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 5 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives5 noted
    5 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text1 noted
    1 destination are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure3 noted
    3 of 5 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
  • Image weight and alt length13 noted
    13 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 5 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 11 response headers recorded across 306 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 5 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 66 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2860 sites, median 80%, average 79%

luumsalon.com scores 76%, higher than 32% of the 2860 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751490%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 42 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 79 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 108 sites78%: 131 sites79%: 110 sites80%: 127 sites81%: 124 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 120 sites84%: 130 sites85%: 107 sites86%: 95 sites87%: 94 sites88%: 81 sites89%: 76 sites90%: 54 sites91%: 58 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 28 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 14 sites96%: 17 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 7 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 149 sites76% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Several areas need improvement, including optimizing meta descriptions and title tags, fixing non-200 responses, and creating a sitemap. These actions will enhance your site's SEO performance significantly.

  1. 1

    Fix Non-200 Responses

    Why: Non-200 responses can harm user experience and SEO.

    How: Redirect the URLs that return 301 statuses or update the paths for the 404 URLs.

    Checks: status-codes

  2. 2

    Create a Sitemap

    Why: Sitemaps help search engines discover and index your content.

    How: Generate a sitemap using an online tool or plugin, and place it at /sitemap.xml.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

  3. 3

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: Title tags should be concise for better click-through rates.

    How: Shorten each title tag to under 60 characters. Use keywords relevant to each page.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Optimize Meta Descriptions

    Why: Meta descriptions should be engaging and concise for better CTR.

    How: Shorten each meta description to under 160 characters. Focus on key services and benefits.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Address Heavy Assets

    Why: Large assets can slow down your site, affecting user experience.

    How: Optimize images using compression tools and consider using a CDN.

    Checks: heavy-assets

  6. 6

    Improve Thin Content

    Why: Thin content may not rank well and lacks user value.

    How: Add more informative content or services to the page to exceed 200 words.

    Checks: thin-content

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website has several security headers missing which could expose it to risks such as interception, clickjacking, and script injection. Implementing these headers will improve overall security and protect both your site and its users.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users typing your URL without HTTPS may be intercepted on initial requests.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Lack of CSP allows unrestricted loading of scripts, styles, and frames, increasing attack risks.

    Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; frame-ancestors 'none'.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Absence of clickjacking protection allows your pages to be embedded in malicious frames.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Not using this header may lead browsers to execute files as scripts based on their content.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Third-party Scripts without Subresource Integrity (SRI)Low

    Why it matters: Scripts from external sources may run unverified code if compromised.

    Fix: Use SRI attribute for third-party scripts, or implement a CSP to control sources.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  6. 6

    Sensitive Path in Robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: Listing sensitive paths like /wp-admin/ publicly might invite probing attacks.

    Fix: Consider implementing real access control instead of relying on robots.txt.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://luumsalon.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://luumsalon.com/team/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://luumsalon.com/services/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://luumsalon.com/refer-friends/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://luumsalon.com/faq/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 5 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://luumsalon.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://luumsalon.com/team/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://luumsalon.com/services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://luumsalon.com/refer-friends/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://luumsalon.com/faq/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://luumsalon.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://luumsalon.com/team/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://luumsalon.com/services/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://luumsalon.com/refer-friends/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://luumsalon.com/faq/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://luumsalon.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://luumsalon.com/team/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://luumsalon.com/services/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://luumsalon.com/refer-friends/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://luumsalon.com/faq/ → no x-content-type-options
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 3 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • fd.cleantalk.org (5 script tags)
    • www.googletagmanager.com (5 script tags)
    • cdn.trustindex.io (1 script tag)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
6 checks passed, 4 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 5 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableForms over HTTPS

    No forms were found on the sampled pages.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of luumsalon.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near luumsalon.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling luumsalon.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own luumsalon.com?