Scanned sites / roastersmap.com

SEO report for roastersmap.com DR 8

The latest Site Spider scan of roastersmap.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/roastersmap-com/2026-09-11-1911.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-11 19:11:39 UTC, finished 2026-09-12 20:20:57 UTC

Site: https://roastersmap.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

76/ 100Good

On September 11, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 4867 pages and 5291 assets of roastersmap.com, starting from https://roastersmap.com/. It scored 76 out of 100, a good result. 12 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (2,595), heavy assets (284), sitemap coverage (3,242); 8 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−6.2), heavy assets (−6), sitemap coverage (−4.7). 7 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium1 medium, 1 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
4867
Assets fetched
5291
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
12 of 27
CoverageJob finished, partial coverage

10,158 of 10,162 discovered URLs were fetched, 4 blocked by robots.txt, 28,897 left out by the 5,000-page and 1,000-asset budget. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 300 link destinations on other sites were checked, 22903 left unchecked.

  • Title tags2,595 issues
    2595 of 3478 pages have title issues. 693 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −6.2 points
  • Meta descriptions1,043 issues
    1043 of 3478 pages have meta description issues. 693 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2 points
  • Headings1,518 issues
    1518 of 3478 pages have heading issues. 693 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.2 points
  • Broken links7 issues
    7 internal links point at 7 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites102 issues
    102 destinations answered with an error, 13 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 22903 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
    −1 points
  • Redirects689 issues
    690 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.7 points
  • Non-200 responses7 issues
    697 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 696 of them are pages, 7 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability243 issues
    243 of 3488 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 683 pages noindex by design.
    −0.6 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 1385 image references have no alt attribute. 680 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets284 issues
    284 assets larger than 500 KB among 5291 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages657 issues
    657 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.6 points
  • Sitemap coverage3,242 issues
    1 sitemap listing 0 URLs: 3242 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −4.7 points
  • Internal link counts59 noted
    Internal link counts for 500 pages; 59 worth a look.
  • Thin content12 issues
    12 of 3478 pages have fewer than 200 words. 693 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format1,341 noted
    1341 of 4867 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals693 noted
    693 of 4171 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives4,171 noted
    4171 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text1,136 noted
    1136 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure1,330 noted
    1330 of 3478 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 693 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt lengthOK
    No image is over 100 KB or carries alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 4171 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 14 response headers recorded across 10158 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 4171 pages; 4123 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 91 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2862 sites, median 80%, average 79%

roastersmap.com scores 76%, higher than 32% of the 2862 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751490%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 42 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 80 sites72%: 75 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 108 sites78%: 131 sites79%: 110 sites80%: 127 sites81%: 124 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 120 sites84%: 131 sites85%: 107 sites86%: 94 sites87%: 94 sites88%: 81 sites89%: 76 sites90%: 54 sites91%: 58 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 28 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 14 sites96%: 18 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 7 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 149 sites76% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your website has several technical issues that need addressing, including broken links, redirecting URLs, and title/meta description problems. Prioritize resolving these issues to improve user experience and SEO performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Broken links lead to poor user experience and negative SEO impact.

    How: Identify and replace broken links with valid URLs or remove them from your content.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Manage Redirects

    Why: Excessive redirects can slow down site performance and confuse users.

    How: Update links to point directly to the final destination URLs to minimize the number of redirects.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: Pages returning non-200 responses can hinder user access and SEO.

    How: Investigate pages with non-200 responses and ensure they return a proper 200 status or redirect correctly.

    Checks: status-codes

  4. 4

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: Improper title tags can hurt click-through rates and SEO ranking.

    How: Shorten long titles to under 60 characters and ensure relevance to the content.

    Checks: titles

  5. 5

    Enhance Meta Descriptions

    Why: Meta descriptions are crucial for SEO and increasing click potential.

    How: Rewrite meta descriptions to make them unique and within the ideal length of 150-160 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  6. 6

    Add Missing Headings

    Why: Missing or multiple H1s hinder content clarity and SEO.

    How: Ensure each page has a single H1 tag that accurately reflects the page content.

    Checks: headings

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The site has gaps in security that need attention, particularly concerning transport security and exposure of sensitive paths. Implementing strict transport security and managing third-party scripts can help mitigate risks.

  • 0 high
  • 1 medium
  • 1 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users can be vulnerable to man-in-the-middle attacks when accessing the site without HTTPS.

    Fix: Add the header 'Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload' to server responses.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Unprotected Third-party ScriptsLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from external domains can be modified without integrity checks, potentially compromising the site.

    Fix: Consider using Subresource Integrity (SRI) where possible or implementing a Content-Security-Policy that restricts trusted sources.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  3. 3

    Sensitive Paths in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The public listing of private paths could aid malicious users in probing for vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Implement server-side access controls for the listed paths (/wp-admin/, /wp-includes/, /cgi-bin/) and consider removing them from robots.txt.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://roastersmap.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://roastersmap.com/coffee-roasters-usa/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://roastersmap.com/shop/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://roastersmap.com/blog/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://roastersmap.com/my-account/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://roastersmap.com/my-account/?register → no strict-transport-security
    • https://roastersmap.com/coffee-roasters-california/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://roastersmap.com/coffee-roasters-texas/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://roastersmap.com/coffee-roasters-florida/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://roastersmap.com/coffee-roasters-new-york/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://roastersmap.com/coffee-roasters-illinois/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://roastersmap.com/coffee-roasters-georgia/ → no strict-transport-security
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • maps.googleapis.com (40 script tags)
    • www.google.com (2 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 3 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-includes/
    • Disallow: /cgi-bin/
9 checks passed, 4 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 4171 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 4171 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 4171 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    86 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    No recognisable library versions were found in the sampled scripts.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of roastersmap.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near roastersmap.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling roastersmap.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own roastersmap.com?