Scanned sites / gardenridgedental.com / 2026-09-14-0342

gardenridgedental.com scan from 2026-09-14 03:42:40 UTC DR 0

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-14-0342

Scanned 2026-09-14 03:42:40 UTC, finished 2026-09-14 03:50:43 UTC. Found on page 3 of brave web search results

Site: https://gardenridgedental.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

76/ 100Good

On September 14, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 22 pages and 167 assets of gardenridgedental.com, starting from https://gardenridgedental.com/. It scored 76 out of 100, a good result. 9 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (21), meta descriptions (19), heavy assets (6); 9 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−10), meta descriptions (−7.2), heavy assets (−3.6). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium1 medium and 1 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
22
Assets fetched
167
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
9 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

189 of 189 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 8 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags21 issues
    21 of 21 pages have title issues.
    −10 points
  • Meta descriptions19 issues
    19 of 21 pages have meta description issues.
    −7.2 points
  • Headings4 issues
    4 of 21 pages have heading issues.
    −1.1 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites42 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 2 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 6 destinations checked.
  • Redirects1 issue
    1 redirecting URL, 0 of them chained.
    −0.2 points
  • Non-200 responses19 noted
    19 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 1 of them is a page, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 21 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
  • Image alt text3 issues
    3 of 205 image references have no alt attribute. 152 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
    −0.1 points
  • Heavy assets6 issues
    6 assets larger than 500 KB among 167 fetched assets.
    −3.6 points
  • Orphan pages3 issues
    3 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.6 points
  • Sitemap coverage3 issues
    3 sitemaps listing 21 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 3 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.9 points
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 21 pages; none is a dead end or buried.
  • Thin content2 issues
    2 of 21 pages have fewer than 200 words.
    −0.8 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format3 noted
    3 of 22 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 21 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives21 noted
    21 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text1 noted
    1 destination are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure5 noted
    5 of 21 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
  • Image weight and alt length20 noted
    20 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies1 noted
    1 URL answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 21 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 15 response headers recorded across 189 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 21 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 75 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2858 sites, median 80%, average 79%

gardenridgedental.com scores 76%, higher than 32% of the 2858 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751490%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 6 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 10 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 42 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 80 sites72%: 75 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 81 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 108 sites78%: 132 sites79%: 110 sites80%: 127 sites81%: 124 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 120 sites84%: 130 sites85%: 107 sites86%: 95 sites87%: 94 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 74 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 58 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 28 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 14 sites96%: 17 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 7 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 149 sites76% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your website has several critical issues impacting SEO performance, including non-200 responses and title/meta description problems. Addressing these will improve visibility. Here are prioritized fixes.

  1. 1

    Fix Non-200 Responses

    Why: 19 URLs returning non-200 status can harm SEO and user experience.

    How: Resolve 404 errors by creating correct pages, or remove the links if content is obsolete.

    Checks: status-codes

  2. 2

    Update Title Tags

    Why: Title tags are too long for all pages, affecting search result visibility.

    How: Shorten each title to under 60 characters, reflecting unique content of the pages.

    Checks: titles

  3. 3

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: 19 pages have meta description issues, limiting click-through rates.

    How: Rewrite meta descriptions to be concise (150-160 characters) and engaging.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  4. 4

    Add Missing H1 Tags

    Why: 4 pages lack H1 tags, which can impact SEO relevance.

    How: Ensure each page has a unique H1 tag summarizing the content accurately.

    Checks: headings

  5. 5

    Link Orphan Pages Internally

    Why: 3 pages are orphaned, reducing their chance of being crawled and indexed.

    How: Add internal links to these pages from relevant existing content.

    Checks: orphan-pages

  6. 6

    Reduce Heavy Assets

    Why: 6 assets exceed optimal size, which can slow down your site.

    How: Optimize images and files to be under 500 KB using compression tools.

    Checks: heavy-assets

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The security review for gardenridgedental.com highlights concerns with its Content Security Policy allowing unsafe scripts and the use of third-party scripts without integrity checks. Addressing these issues will enhance your site's protection against potential attacks.

  • 0 high
  • 1 medium
  • 1 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Unsafe Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: The CSP allows 'unsafe-inline' and 'unsafe-eval', reducing its effectiveness against script injection attacks.

    Fix: Update your CSP to omit 'unsafe-inline' and 'unsafe-eval'. Consider a policy like: `default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' https://trusted.source;`

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  2. 2

    Third-party Scripts without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Running scripts from third-party domains without Subresource Integrity can lead to a compromised site if those domains are hacked.

    Fix: Implement Subresource Integrity (SRI) where possible, or tighten your CSP to only allow scripts from known, trusted domains.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

What the checks found

  • NoteContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, but it allows inline or eval scripts ('unsafe-inline' / 'unsafe-eval'), which removes most of its protection against injected scripts.

    • https://gardenridgedental.com/ → upgrade-insecure-requests; default-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https:; connect-src 'self' https: wss:; img-src 'self' https: data:; font-src 'self' https: data:; worker-src 'self' blob:; frame-ancestors 'self';
    • https://gardenridgedental.com/about-us/ → upgrade-insecure-requests; default-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https:; connect-src 'self' https: wss:; img-src 'self' https: data:; font-src 'self' https: data:; worker-src 'self' blob:; frame-ancestors 'self';
    • https://gardenridgedental.com/preventative-dentistry/ → upgrade-insecure-requests; default-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https:; connect-src 'self' https: wss:; img-src 'self' https: data:; font-src 'self' https: data:; worker-src 'self' blob:; frame-ancestors 'self';
    • https://gardenridgedental.com/preventative-dentistry-exams/ → upgrade-insecure-requests; default-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https:; connect-src 'self' https: wss:; img-src 'self' https: data:; font-src 'self' https: data:; worker-src 'self' blob:; frame-ancestors 'self';
    • https://gardenridgedental.com/preventative-dentistry-tooth-cleaning/ → upgrade-insecure-requests; default-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https:; connect-src 'self' https: wss:; img-src 'self' https: data:; font-src 'self' https: data:; worker-src 'self' blob:; frame-ancestors 'self';
    • https://gardenridgedental.com/preventative-dentistry-fillings/ → upgrade-insecure-requests; default-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https:; connect-src 'self' https: wss:; img-src 'self' https: data:; font-src 'self' https: data:; worker-src 'self' blob:; frame-ancestors 'self';
    • https://gardenridgedental.com/preventative-dentistry-crowns/ → upgrade-insecure-requests; default-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https:; connect-src 'self' https: wss:; img-src 'self' https: data:; font-src 'self' https: data:; worker-src 'self' blob:; frame-ancestors 'self';
    • https://gardenridgedental.com/preventative-dentistry-root-canals/ → upgrade-insecure-requests; default-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https:; connect-src 'self' https: wss:; img-src 'self' https: data:; font-src 'self' https: data:; worker-src 'self' blob:; frame-ancestors 'self';
    • https://gardenridgedental.com/tooth-replacement/ → upgrade-insecure-requests; default-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https:; connect-src 'self' https: wss:; img-src 'self' https: data:; font-src 'self' https: data:; worker-src 'self' blob:; frame-ancestors 'self';
    • https://gardenridgedental.com/tooth-replacement-extractions/ → upgrade-insecure-requests; default-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https:; connect-src 'self' https: wss:; img-src 'self' https: data:; font-src 'self' https: data:; worker-src 'self' blob:; frame-ancestors 'self';
    • https://gardenridgedental.com/tooth-replacement-implants/ → upgrade-insecure-requests; default-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https:; connect-src 'self' https: wss:; img-src 'self' https: data:; font-src 'self' https: data:; worker-src 'self' blob:; frame-ancestors 'self';
    • https://gardenridgedental.com/tooth-replacement-bridges/ → upgrade-insecure-requests; default-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https:; connect-src 'self' https: wss:; img-src 'self' https: data:; font-src 'self' https: data:; worker-src 'self' blob:; frame-ancestors 'self';
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • fd.cleantalk.org (21 script tags)
    • www.googletagmanager.com (21 script tags)
10 checks passed, 4 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 21 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 21 HTML pages.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 21 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 21 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    1 form found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableSensitive paths in robots.txt

    No robots.txt was fetched.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near gardenridgedental.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling gardenridgedental.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own gardenridgedental.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming gardenridgedental.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.