Scanned sites / allterrainfargo.com

SEO report for allterrainfargo.com DR 13

The latest Site Spider scan of allterrainfargo.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/allterrainfargo-com/2026-09-13-2247.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-13 22:47:31 UTC, finished 2026-09-13 23:25:43 UTC. Found on page 4 of brave web search results

Site: https://allterrainfargo.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

76/ 100Good

On September 13, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 265 pages and 874 assets of allterrainfargo.com, starting from https://allterrainfargo.com/. It scored 76 out of 100, a good result. 13 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (199), heavy assets (129), headings (208); 5 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−6.4), heavy assets (−6), headings (−5). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium1 medium and 1 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
265
Assets fetched
874
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
13 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

1,139 of 1,142 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 44 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags45 issues
    45 of 208 pages have title issues. 41 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1.8 points
  • Meta descriptions199 issues
    199 of 208 pages have meta description issues. 41 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −6.4 points
  • Headings208 issues
    208 of 208 pages have heading issues. 41 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −5 points
  • Broken links7 issues
    12 internal links point at 7 broken URLs.
    −0.6 points
  • Links to other sites2 issues
    2 destinations answered with an error, 9 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 34 destinations checked.
    −0.3 points
  • Redirects9 issues
    10 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.1 points
  • Non-200 responses7 issues
    33 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 16 of them are pages, 7 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.3 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability1 issue
    1 of 210 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 39 pages noindex by design.
  • Image alt text4 issues
    4 of 1187 image references have no alt attribute. 552 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets129 issues
    129 assets larger than 500 KB among 874 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages71 issues
    71 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −1.1 points
  • Sitemap coverage97 issues
    9 sitemaps listing 182 URLs: 26 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 71 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −2.3 points
  • Internal link counts73 noted
    Internal link counts for 249 pages; 73 worth a look.
  • Thin content12 issues
    12 of 208 pages have fewer than 200 words. 41 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.4 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format13 noted
    13 of 265 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals41 noted
    41 of 249 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives249 noted
    249 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text53 noted
    53 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure168 noted
    168 of 208 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 41 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length191 noted
    191 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies2 noted
    2 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 249 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 14 response headers recorded across 1139 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 249 pages; 114 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 52 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2858 sites, median 80%, average 79%

allterrainfargo.com scores 76%, higher than 32% of the 2858 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751490%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 6 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 10 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 42 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 80 sites72%: 75 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 81 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 108 sites78%: 132 sites79%: 110 sites80%: 127 sites81%: 124 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 120 sites84%: 130 sites85%: 107 sites86%: 95 sites87%: 94 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 74 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 58 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 28 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 14 sites96%: 17 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 7 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 149 sites76% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

The site has several critical SEO issues. Prioritize fixing broken links, meta descriptions, title tags, and heading issues to enhance user experience and search visibility. Addressing these will improve site health significantly.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: 12 internal links point to broken URLs, affecting user experience and SEO.

    How: Update or remove the links found in the broken links report.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Update Meta Descriptions

    Why: 198 pages are missing or have incorrect meta descriptions, impairing click-through rates.

    How: Create unique, relevant descriptions for all affected pages.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  3. 3

    Revise Title Tags

    Why: 45 pages show title issues which can negatively impact search rankings.

    How: Shorten or modify longer titles; ensure they're unique for each page.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Correct Heading Issues

    Why: Multiple H1 tags count negatively in SEO.

    How: Ensure each page has one H1 tag that describes the content; adjust other headings (H2, H3) accordingly.

    Checks: headings

  5. 5

    Enhance Indexability

    Why: One indexable page has warnings that may hinder its visibility.

    How: Review the indexability settings to correct issues found in the report.

    Checks: indexability

  6. 6

    Address Thin Content

    Why: 12 pages have fewer than 200 words which may result in poor rankings.

    How: Add valuable content to these pages to provide more information and context.

    Checks: thin-content

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website lacks a Content Security Policy, exposing it to risks from malicious scripts. Additionally, third-party scripts are integrated without integrity checks. Addressing these issues is crucial for enhancing security.

  • 0 high
  • 1 medium
  • 1 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: Without a Content Security Policy, the site is vulnerable to attacks like cross-site scripting (XSS).

    Fix: Implement a Content Security Policy header such as: `Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'` to restrict resource loading.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  2. 2

    Third-party Scripts without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Using scripts from external sources without Subresource Integrity allows tampering of these scripts, potentially leading to security breaches.

    Fix: Consider using a Content Security Policy that specifies allowed sources, or implement Subresource Integrity checks for third-party scripts.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

What the checks found

  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 249 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://allterrainfargo.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://allterrainfargo.com/employment/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://allterrainfargo.com/contact-all-terrain/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://allterrainfargo.com/project/services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://allterrainfargo.com/project/weed-control-fertilizer-2/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://allterrainfargo.com/project/landscape-maintenance/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://allterrainfargo.com/mowing-fargo/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://allterrainfargo.com/sprinklers-2/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://allterrainfargo.com/snow-removal-fargo/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://allterrainfargo.com/other-services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://allterrainfargo.com/about-all-terrain/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://allterrainfargo.com/all-terrain-university/ → no content-security-policy
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 3 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (120 script tags)
    • www.google.com (5 script tags)
    • cdn.trustindex.io (1 script tag)
11 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 249 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 249 HTML pages.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 249 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 249 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    53 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of allterrainfargo.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near allterrainfargo.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling allterrainfargo.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own allterrainfargo.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming allterrainfargo.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.