Scanned sites / studio1ri.com
SEO report for studio1ri.com DR 7
The latest Site Spider scan of studio1ri.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/studio1ri-com/2026-09-14-0203.
DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.
Latest scan
Scanned 2026-09-14 02:03:06 UTC, finished 2026-09-14 02:11:53 UTC. Found on page 3 of brave web search results
Site: https://studio1ri.com/
Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.
On September 14, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 18 pages and 197 assets of studio1ri.com, starting from https://studio1ri.com/. It scored 76 out of 100, a good result. 8 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (17), heavy assets (13), thin content (12); 12 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−8), heavy assets (−6), thin content (−5.6). 7 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.
Security review: Medium4 medium and 2 low findings. See the security findings ↓
- Pages crawled
- 18
- Assets fetched
- 197
- Status
- Completed
- Checks with issues
- 8 of 27
215 of 215 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 21 link destinations on other sites were checked.
- Title tags1 issue1 of 17 pages have title issues.−0.6 points
- Meta descriptions17 issues17 of 17 pages have meta description issues.−8 points
- Headings1 issue1 of 17 pages have heading issues.−0.4 points
- Broken linksOK0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
- Links to other sites35 noted0 destinations answered with an error, 3 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 14 destinations checked.
- Redirects1 issue2 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.−0.2 points
- Non-200 responses2 noted2 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 1 of them is a page, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
- Rate limitedOKThe site did not rate limit the crawler.
- IndexabilityOK0 of 17 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
- Image alt textOK0 of 99 image references have no alt attribute. 81 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
- Heavy assets13 issues13 assets larger than 500 KB among 197 fetched assets.−6 points
- Orphan pages6 issues6 pages have no internal links pointing at them.−1.4 points
- Sitemap coverage6 issues2 sitemaps listing 17 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 6 reachable only via the sitemap.−2.1 points
- Internal link countsOKInternal link counts for 17 pages; none is a dead end or buried.
- Thin content12 issues12 of 17 pages have fewer than 200 words.−5.6 points
- Duplicate contentOK0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
- URL formatOKAll 18 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
- CanonicalsOK0 of 17 pages have a canonical worth checking.
- Robots directives17 noted17 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
- Anchor text1 noted1 destination are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
- Title and heading structure2 noted2 of 17 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
- Image weight and alt length22 noted22 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
- Response anomaliesOKNo redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
- HTML and head validationNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- hreflangNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- Structured dataNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- Near duplicatesNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- Soft 404sOKNone of 17 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
- AccessibilityNot checkedNot checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
- Link positionsNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
- PaginationNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- Headers and cookiesOK0 cookies set by the site; 11 response headers recorded across 215 URLs.
- Orphans in searchNot checkedNot checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
- Link ScoreOKLink Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 17 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
- JavaScript renderingNot checkedNot checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
- PageSpeed Insights4 notedMobile performance 61 on average across 5 pages; 4 below Google's good thresholds.
- SpellingNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
Where this site sits among all scanned sites
2858 sites, median 80%, average 79%
studio1ri.com scores 76%, higher than 32% of the 2858 scanned sites. See the full ranking.
Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).
Internal link map
Loading the link map...
Fix plan
Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findingsWritten from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.
Your website has several SEO issues to address, particularly regarding title tags, meta descriptions, and thin content. Fixing these will enhance both user experience and search visibility.
- 1
Fix Title Tag Issues
Why: A long title tag can affect search rankings and visibility.
How: Shorten the title to under 60 characters. Suggested: 'Studio One RI Dance Complex - Dance with Heart'.
Checks: titles
- 2
Add Meta Descriptions
Why: Missing meta descriptions reduce click-through rates from search results.
How: Write unique, concise descriptions for each page (150-160 characters). Include primary keywords.
Checks: meta-descriptions
- 3
Resolve Non-200 Responses
Why: Pages returning 301 responses can confuse users and search engines.
How: Update links to point directly to final destination URLs without redirects.
Checks: status-codes
- 4
Consolidate Headings
Why: Multiple H1 headings can confuse search engines about the page structure.
How: Change the second H1 on the 'Contact' page to a lower heading level (H2 or H3).
Checks: headings
- 5
Address Thin Content Issues
Why: Pages with fewer than 200 words may rank poorly.
How: Expand content on pages identified as thin by adding relevant information.
Checks: thin-content
- 6
Link to Orphan Pages
Why: Orphan pages are not indexed well and limit visibility.
How: Add internal links from relevant pages to the orphan pages identified.
Checks: orphan-pages
Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.
Security review
Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawlYour website has several security issues that need addressing, particularly around the use of security headers. Implementing these measures will help protect your users and data from various attacks.
- 0 high
- 4 medium
- 2 low
- 0 info
- 1
Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium
Why it matters: Without HSTS, visitors can be intercepted on their first request without HTTPS.
Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload
Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security
- 2
No Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium
Why it matters: A lack of CSP allows scripts and resources to load from any source, increasing XSS risks.
Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; script-src 'self';
Evidence: Content Security Policy
- 3
Missing X-Frame-OptionsMedium
Why it matters: Pages can be embedded in frames, enabling clickjacking attacks.
Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN
Evidence: Clickjacking protection
- 4
Vulnerable JavaScript LibrariesMedium
Why it matters: Two libraries used have known vulnerabilities that can be exploited depending on their implementation.
Fix: Upgrade Bootstrap to version 3.4.1 and Moment.js to version 2.29.4.
Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries
- 5
Missing X-Content-Type-OptionsLow
Why it matters: Without this header, browsers may execute files as scripts based on their contents.
Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff
Evidence: MIME sniffing protection
- 6
Third-Party Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow
Why it matters: Scripts from third-party domains can change without your control, providing potential attack vectors.
Fix: Consider implementing a strict Content-Security-Policy or using Subresource Integrity where applicable.
Evidence: Third-party scripts
What the checks found
- FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium
No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.
- https://studio1ri.com/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://studio1ri.com/about/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://studio1ri.com/406-2/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://studio1ri.com/faq/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://studio1ri.com/instructors/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://studio1ri.com/private-lessons/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://studio1ri.com/group-lessons/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://studio1ri.com/wedding-lessons/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://studio1ri.com/contact/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://studio1ri.com/privacy-policy/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://studio1ri.com/refund-policy/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://studio1ri.com/lessons/ → no strict-transport-security
- FoundContent Security PolicyMedium
None of the 17 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.
- https://studio1ri.com/ → no content-security-policy
- https://studio1ri.com/about/ → no content-security-policy
- https://studio1ri.com/406-2/ → no content-security-policy
- https://studio1ri.com/faq/ → no content-security-policy
- https://studio1ri.com/instructors/ → no content-security-policy
- https://studio1ri.com/private-lessons/ → no content-security-policy
- https://studio1ri.com/group-lessons/ → no content-security-policy
- https://studio1ri.com/wedding-lessons/ → no content-security-policy
- https://studio1ri.com/contact/ → no content-security-policy
- https://studio1ri.com/privacy-policy/ → no content-security-policy
- https://studio1ri.com/refund-policy/ → no content-security-policy
- https://studio1ri.com/lessons/ → no content-security-policy
- FoundClickjacking protectionMedium
No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.
- https://studio1ri.com/ → no x-frame-options
- https://studio1ri.com/about/ → no x-frame-options
- https://studio1ri.com/406-2/ → no x-frame-options
- https://studio1ri.com/faq/ → no x-frame-options
- https://studio1ri.com/instructors/ → no x-frame-options
- https://studio1ri.com/private-lessons/ → no x-frame-options
- https://studio1ri.com/group-lessons/ → no x-frame-options
- https://studio1ri.com/wedding-lessons/ → no x-frame-options
- https://studio1ri.com/contact/ → no x-frame-options
- https://studio1ri.com/privacy-policy/ → no x-frame-options
- https://studio1ri.com/refund-policy/ → no x-frame-options
- https://studio1ri.com/lessons/ → no x-frame-options
- FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow
No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.
- https://studio1ri.com/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://studio1ri.com/about/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://studio1ri.com/406-2/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://studio1ri.com/faq/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://studio1ri.com/instructors/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://studio1ri.com/private-lessons/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://studio1ri.com/group-lessons/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://studio1ri.com/wedding-lessons/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://studio1ri.com/contact/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://studio1ri.com/privacy-policy/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://studio1ri.com/refund-policy/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://studio1ri.com/lessons/ → no x-content-type-options
- FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium
2 libraries with published vulnerabilities: Bootstrap 3.3.7, Moment.js 2.20.1. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.
- Bootstrap 3.3.7 in https://studio1ri.com/wp-content/plugins/dance-studio-manager/assets/bootstrap-…: CVE-2016-10735, CVE-2018-14040, CVE-2018-14041, CVE-2018-14042, CVE-2019-8331 (XSS through data attributes in tooltip, popover, collapse and scrollspy); fixed in 3.4.1
- Moment.js 2.20.1 in https://studio1ri.com/wp-content/plugins/dance-studio-manager/assets/js/moment.…: CVE-2022-24785 (path traversal in locale loading), CVE-2022-31129 (ReDoS in string parsing); fixed in 2.29.4
- NoteThird-party scripts
Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)
- img1.wsimg.com (17 script tags)
- www.google.com (1 script tag)
7 checks passed, 3 not applicable
- OKHTTPS
All 17 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.
- OKSoftware version disclosure
The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.
- OKMixed content
No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.
- OKForms over HTTPS
1 form found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.
- OKKeys and secrets in page code
No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.
- OKExposed files and listings
None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.
- OKSensitive paths in robots.txt
robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.
- Not applicableReferrer policy
This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.
- Not applicablePermissions policy
This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.
- Not applicableCookie flags
This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.
A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.
Earlier scans of studio1ri.com
No other scans of this site yet.
Sites scoring near studio1ri.com
Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.
- peakmissoula.comDR 2976/100 · rank 1849 · 35 pages
- gardenridgedental.comDR 076/100 · rank 1849 · 22 pages
- trademarkmechanical.comDR 1276/100 · rank 1849 · 240 pages
- allterrainfargo.comDR 1376/100 · rank 1849 · 265 pages
- axishealth.caDR 376/100 · rank 1849 · 196 pages
- www.416-flowers.comDR 2776/100 · rank 1849 · 5,000 pages
DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.
This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling studio1ri.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.
Own studio1ri.com?
- Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
- Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming studio1ri.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.