Scanned sites / arvow.com / 2026-10-30-1521

arvow.com scan from 2026-10-30 15:21:41 UTC DR 58

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-10-30-1521

Scanned 2026-10-30 15:21:41 UTC, finished 2026-10-30 15:38:42 UTC. Found with 42backlinks.com tool directory

Site: https://arvow.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

77/ 100Good

On October 30, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 753 pages and 999 assets of arvow.com, starting from https://arvow.com/. It scored 77 out of 100, a good result. 13 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (572), heavy assets (45), title tags (421); 7 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−6.1), heavy assets (−6), title tags (−5.6). 13 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium, 3 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
753
Assets fetched
999
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
13 of 33
CoverageJob finished, partial coverage

1,752 of 1,753 discovered URLs were fetched, 4,441 left out by the 5,000-page and 1,000-asset budget. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 300 link destinations on other sites were checked, 1575 left unchecked.

  • Title tags421 issues
    421 of 727 pages have title issues. 22 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −5.6 points
  • Meta descriptions572 issues
    572 of 727 pages have meta description issues. 22 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −6.1 points
  • Headings84 issues
    84 of 727 pages have heading issues. 22 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.7 points
  • Broken links2 issues
    2 internal links point at 2 broken URLs.
    −0.1 points
  • Links to other sites27 issues
    27 destinations answered with an error, 64 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 1575 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
    −1.4 points
  • Redirects2 issues
    2 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responses2 issues
    5 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 4 of them are pages, 2 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability24 issues
    24 of 730 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 19 pages noindex by design. 19 noindex pages are listed in the sitemap, which asks search engines both to visit and to ignore them.
    −0.3 points
  • Image alt text147 issues
    147 of 10855 image references have no alt attribute. 1902 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
    −0.1 points
  • Heavy assets45 issues
    45 assets larger than 500 KB among 999 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages102 issues
    102 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.5 points
  • Sitemap coverage218 issues
    1 sitemap listing 629 URLs: 115 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 84 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −1.7 points
  • Internal link counts75 noted
    Internal link counts for 500 pages; 75 worth a look.
  • Thin content17 issues
    17 of 727 pages have fewer than 200 words. 22 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.2 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format9 noted
    9 of 753 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals24 noted
    24 of 749 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives19 noted
    19 pages carry a robots directive; 730 carry none.
  • Anchor text3 noted
    3 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure265 noted
    265 of 727 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 22 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length938 noted
    172 images over 100 KB; 766 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validation441 noted
    441 of 749 pages have HTML problems: 49 with head tags outside <head>, 0 over 2 MB.
  • hreflangOK
    No page declares hreflang.
  • Structured data6 noted
    47 of 727 indexable pages carry structured data: FAQPage (47), Question (47), Answer (47), Article (41), Organization (41). 6 pages with errors a rich result would fail on.
  • Near duplicates17 noted
    17 pages in 8 groups read almost the same as another page (95% alike or more).
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 749 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positions6 noted
    6 of 642 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
  • Pagination1 noted
    51 pages in pagination sequences; 1 with problems.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    1 cookie set by the site; 9 response headers recorded across 1752 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 749 pages; 694 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • Spelling479 noted
    479 words an English dictionary does not know, on 624 pages. Product names and jargon will appear here too.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2345 sites, median 79%, average 78%

arvow.com scores 77%, higher than 38% of the 2345 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581150%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 7 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 4 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 10 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 69 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 70 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 107 sites79%: 85 sites80%: 107 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 102 sites84%: 106 sites85%: 88 sites86%: 71 sites87%: 74 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 65 sites90%: 35 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 17 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 12 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 5 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 68 sites77% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Fix a few critical issues and improve SEO, including broken links, redirect issues, title and meta description problems. Addressing these can enhance user experience and search visibility.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Broken links lead to 404 errors, negatively impacting user experience and SEO.

    How: Update or remove links pointing to broken URLs: https://arvow.com/[email protected] and https://arvow.com/terms.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: URLs returning errors or redirects can hinder site access for users and crawlers.

    How: Ensure all URLs return a 2xx response, especially fixing the 404 on https://arvow.com/[email protected].

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Address Title Tag Issues

    Why: Poor title tags can reduce click-through rates and confuse search engines.

    How: Revise title tags for affected pages, ensuring they are unique and descriptive.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Revise Meta Descriptions

    Why: Missing or duplicate meta descriptions can negatively affect search visibility.

    How: Create unique meta descriptions for the 207 pages noted to be missing them.

    Evidence: 207 pages have no meta description at all.

    207 pages affected

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Add Headings

    Why: Missing H1 tags can impact content clarity and SEO ranking.

    How: Insert appropriate H1 headings for pages lacking them, like https://arvow.com/about.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Enhance Content Quality

    Why: Thin content pages may not satisfy user intent and can affect your site's SEO.

    How: Add more content to the 17 pages identified with fewer than 200 words.

    Checks: thin-content

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website has several security vulnerabilities that can expose users to risks, including a lack of important headers for transport security, content security, and clickjacking protection. Immediate action is needed to enhance security and protect user data.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 3 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users are vulnerable to man-in-the-middle attacks when accessing the site via HTTP.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Absence of CSP allows scripts to load from any source, increasing the risk of XSS attacks.

    Fix: Add a CSP header, e.g., Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-OptionsMedium

    Why it matters: Lack of clickjacking protection can allow malicious sites to embed your pages.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-OptionsLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers may incorrectly interpret file types, leading to potential security issues.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Missing Referrer-PolicyLow

    Why it matters: A lack of referrer policy may expose users' URLs and data at other sites.

    Fix: Add the header: Referrer-Policy: no-referrer

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  6. 6

    Third-Party Scripts without Subresource Integrity (SRI)Low

    Why it matters: Running scripts from unprotected domains poses risks if these domains are compromised.

    Fix: Implement SRI for all third-party scripts or limit them via a Content Security Policy.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  7. 7

    Missing Permissions-PolicyInfo

    Why it matters: Without a permissions policy, potentially risky features remain active for injected scripts.

    Fix: Add the header: Permissions-Policy: geolocation=(self)

    Evidence: Permissions policy

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://arvow.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-writer → no strict-transport-security
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-editor → no strict-transport-security
    • https://arvow.com/ai-news-article-generator → no strict-transport-security
    • https://arvow.com/youtube-video-to-blog-post → no strict-transport-security
    • https://arvow.com/autoblog → no strict-transport-security
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-agent → no strict-transport-security
    • https://arvow.com/google-review-automation → no strict-transport-security
    • https://arvow.com/gbp-posts-automation → no strict-transport-security
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-chat → no strict-transport-security
    • https://arvow.com/backlink-exchange → no strict-transport-security
    • https://arvow.com/llm-visibility-tracker → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 749 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://arvow.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-writer → no content-security-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-editor → no content-security-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-news-article-generator → no content-security-policy
    • https://arvow.com/youtube-video-to-blog-post → no content-security-policy
    • https://arvow.com/autoblog → no content-security-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-agent → no content-security-policy
    • https://arvow.com/google-review-automation → no content-security-policy
    • https://arvow.com/gbp-posts-automation → no content-security-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-chat → no content-security-policy
    • https://arvow.com/backlink-exchange → no content-security-policy
    • https://arvow.com/llm-visibility-tracker → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://arvow.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-writer → no x-frame-options
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-editor → no x-frame-options
    • https://arvow.com/ai-news-article-generator → no x-frame-options
    • https://arvow.com/youtube-video-to-blog-post → no x-frame-options
    • https://arvow.com/autoblog → no x-frame-options
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-agent → no x-frame-options
    • https://arvow.com/google-review-automation → no x-frame-options
    • https://arvow.com/gbp-posts-automation → no x-frame-options
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-chat → no x-frame-options
    • https://arvow.com/backlink-exchange → no x-frame-options
    • https://arvow.com/llm-visibility-tracker → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://arvow.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-writer → no x-content-type-options
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-editor → no x-content-type-options
    • https://arvow.com/ai-news-article-generator → no x-content-type-options
    • https://arvow.com/youtube-video-to-blog-post → no x-content-type-options
    • https://arvow.com/autoblog → no x-content-type-options
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-agent → no x-content-type-options
    • https://arvow.com/google-review-automation → no x-content-type-options
    • https://arvow.com/gbp-posts-automation → no x-content-type-options
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-chat → no x-content-type-options
    • https://arvow.com/backlink-exchange → no x-content-type-options
    • https://arvow.com/llm-visibility-tracker → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://arvow.com/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-writer → no referrer-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-editor → no referrer-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-news-article-generator → no referrer-policy
    • https://arvow.com/youtube-video-to-blog-post → no referrer-policy
    • https://arvow.com/autoblog → no referrer-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-agent → no referrer-policy
    • https://arvow.com/google-review-automation → no referrer-policy
    • https://arvow.com/gbp-posts-automation → no referrer-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-chat → no referrer-policy
    • https://arvow.com/backlink-exchange → no referrer-policy
    • https://arvow.com/llm-visibility-tracker → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://arvow.com/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-writer → no permissions-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-editor → no permissions-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-news-article-generator → no permissions-policy
    • https://arvow.com/youtube-video-to-blog-post → no permissions-policy
    • https://arvow.com/autoblog → no permissions-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-agent → no permissions-policy
    • https://arvow.com/google-review-automation → no permissions-policy
    • https://arvow.com/gbp-posts-automation → no permissions-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-chat → no permissions-policy
    • https://arvow.com/backlink-exchange → no permissions-policy
    • https://arvow.com/llm-visibility-tracker → no permissions-policy
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 4 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • code.iconify.design (40 script tags)
    • fast.wistia.com (26 script tags)
    • server.fillout.com (1 script tag)
    • fast.wistia.net (1 script tag)
9 checks passed
  • OKHTTPS

    All 749 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKCookie flags

    All 1 cookie carry Secure, HttpOnly and SameSite flags.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    45 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near arvow.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling arvow.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own arvow.com?