Scanned sites / arvow.com / 2026-10-27-1508

arvow.com scan from 2026-10-27 15:08:14 UTC DR 58

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-10-27-1508

Scanned 2026-10-27 15:08:14 UTC, finished 2026-10-27 15:20:45 UTC. Found with 42backlinks.com tool directory

Site: https://arvow.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

77/ 100Good

On October 27, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 754 pages and 999 assets of arvow.com, starting from https://arvow.com/. It scored 77 out of 100, a good result. 13 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (568), heavy assets (45), title tags (415); 7 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−6.1), heavy assets (−6), title tags (−5.6). 13 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium, 3 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
754
Assets fetched
999
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
13 of 33
CoverageJob finished, partial coverage

1,753 of 1,754 discovered URLs were fetched, 4,422 left out by the 5,000-page and 1,000-asset budget. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 300 link destinations on other sites were checked, 1575 left unchecked.

  • Title tags415 issues
    415 of 724 pages have title issues. 22 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −5.6 points
  • Meta descriptions568 issues
    568 of 724 pages have meta description issues. 22 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −6.1 points
  • Headings83 issues
    83 of 724 pages have heading issues. 22 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.7 points
  • Broken links6 issues
    9 internal links point at 6 broken URLs.
    −0.2 points
  • Links to other sites32 issues
    32 destinations answered with an error, 57 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 1575 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
    −1.7 points
  • Redirects2 issues
    2 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responses6 issues
    9 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 8 of them are pages, 6 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.1 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability24 issues
    24 of 727 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 19 pages noindex by design. 19 noindex pages are listed in the sitemap, which asks search engines both to visit and to ignore them.
    −0.3 points
  • Image alt text147 issues
    147 of 10804 image references have no alt attribute. 1899 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
    −0.1 points
  • Heavy assets45 issues
    45 assets larger than 500 KB among 999 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages102 issues
    102 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.5 points
  • Sitemap coverage217 issues
    1 sitemap listing 627 URLs: 114 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 84 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −1.7 points
  • Internal link counts74 noted
    Internal link counts for 500 pages; 74 worth a look.
  • Thin content17 issues
    17 of 724 pages have fewer than 200 words. 22 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.2 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format9 noted
    9 of 754 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals24 noted
    24 of 746 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives19 noted
    19 pages carry a robots directive; 727 carry none.
  • Anchor text3 noted
    3 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure260 noted
    260 of 724 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 22 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length907 noted
    173 images over 100 KB; 734 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validation441 noted
    441 of 746 pages have HTML problems: 49 with head tags outside <head>, 0 over 2 MB.
  • hreflangOK
    No page declares hreflang.
  • Structured data6 noted
    47 of 724 indexable pages carry structured data: FAQPage (47), Question (47), Answer (47), Article (41), Organization (41). 6 pages with errors a rich result would fail on.
  • Near duplicates15 noted
    15 pages in 7 groups read almost the same as another page (95% alike or more).
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 746 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positions6 noted
    6 of 639 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
  • Pagination1 noted
    50 pages in pagination sequences; 1 with problems.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    1 cookie set by the site; 9 response headers recorded across 1753 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 746 pages; 690 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • Spelling474 noted
    474 words an English dictionary does not know, on 619 pages. Product names and jargon will appear here too.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2331 sites, median 79%, average 78%

arvow.com scores 77%, higher than 38% of the 2331 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581150%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 70 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 85 sites80%: 107 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 107 sites85%: 85 sites86%: 69 sites87%: 75 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 64 sites90%: 33 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 11 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 69 sites77% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

The crawl identified several critical issues that can impact your site's performance. Focus on fixing broken links, addressing title and meta description issues, and optimizing heavy assets. Each step will enhance user experience and SEO rankings.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Broken links hinder user navigation and affect SEO.

    How: Update or remove the internal links that point to the broken URLs identified in the crawl.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Improve Title Tags

    Why: Proper title tags enhance search visibility and user engagement.

    How: Revise title tags for pages with issues to ensure they are unique and adequately descriptive.

    Checks: titles

  3. 3

    Enhance Meta Descriptions

    Why: Meta descriptions improve click-through rates from search results.

    How: Write compelling and accurate meta descriptions for the pages indicated with issues.

    Evidence: 206 pages have no meta description at all.

    206 pages affected

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  4. 4

    Optimize Heavy Assets

    Why: Large assets can slow down page loading times, impacting user experience.

    How: Compress or replace the large images identified in the crawl to improve loading speeds.

    Evidence: 628 KB of image, loaded by 7 pages, so every visitor to any of them downloads it.

    7 pages affected

    Depends on: If it is a download rather than part of the page, weight matters less; move it out of the page instead.

    Checks: heavy-assets

  5. 5

    Fix Indexability Issues

    Why: Ensure that indexable pages are correctly set up for search engines.

    How: Remove noindex tags from pages that must be indexed but are listed in the sitemap.

    Checks: indexability

  6. 6

    Address Orphan Pages

    Why: Orphan pages can miss out on traffic and SEO benefits.

    How: Add internal links to the orphan pages from relevant content to improve their visibility.

    Checks: orphan-pages

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

This review highlights key security vulnerabilities found on arvow.com, primarily relating to missing security headers that affect transport security and content policies. Addressing these issues will enhance the site’s resilience against web threats.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 3 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without this header, users may be vulnerable to man-in-the-middle attacks on their first visit.

    Fix: Add the following header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Absence of a CSP allows loading of potentially malicious scripts, which can lead to XSS attacks.

    Fix: Include a policy like: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; script-src 'self';

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: This omission allows clickjacking attacks where pages can be embedded in iframes.

    Fix: Add this header: X-Frame-Options: DENY.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers may incorrectly interpret a file’s content type, leading to security risks.

    Fix: Add this header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Missing Referrer-Policy HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Lack of this header exposes sensitive URL information when users navigate away from the site.

    Fix: Include: Referrer-Policy: no-referrer.

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  6. 6

    Third-Party Scripts without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from external domains can introduce security vulnerabilities if compromised.

    Fix: Implement a Content-Security-Policy to specify trusted domains.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  7. 7

    Missing Permissions-Policy HeaderInfo

    Why it matters: Not having this header can allow injected scripts to utilize unused capabilities like camera or location.

    Fix: Add: Permissions-Policy: geolocation=(self).

    Evidence: Permissions policy

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://arvow.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-writer → no strict-transport-security
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-editor → no strict-transport-security
    • https://arvow.com/ai-news-article-generator → no strict-transport-security
    • https://arvow.com/youtube-video-to-blog-post → no strict-transport-security
    • https://arvow.com/autoblog → no strict-transport-security
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-agent → no strict-transport-security
    • https://arvow.com/google-review-automation → no strict-transport-security
    • https://arvow.com/gbp-posts-automation → no strict-transport-security
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-chat → no strict-transport-security
    • https://arvow.com/backlink-exchange → no strict-transport-security
    • https://arvow.com/llm-visibility-tracker → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 746 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://arvow.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-writer → no content-security-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-editor → no content-security-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-news-article-generator → no content-security-policy
    • https://arvow.com/youtube-video-to-blog-post → no content-security-policy
    • https://arvow.com/autoblog → no content-security-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-agent → no content-security-policy
    • https://arvow.com/google-review-automation → no content-security-policy
    • https://arvow.com/gbp-posts-automation → no content-security-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-chat → no content-security-policy
    • https://arvow.com/backlink-exchange → no content-security-policy
    • https://arvow.com/llm-visibility-tracker → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://arvow.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-writer → no x-frame-options
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-editor → no x-frame-options
    • https://arvow.com/ai-news-article-generator → no x-frame-options
    • https://arvow.com/youtube-video-to-blog-post → no x-frame-options
    • https://arvow.com/autoblog → no x-frame-options
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-agent → no x-frame-options
    • https://arvow.com/google-review-automation → no x-frame-options
    • https://arvow.com/gbp-posts-automation → no x-frame-options
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-chat → no x-frame-options
    • https://arvow.com/backlink-exchange → no x-frame-options
    • https://arvow.com/llm-visibility-tracker → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://arvow.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-writer → no x-content-type-options
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-editor → no x-content-type-options
    • https://arvow.com/ai-news-article-generator → no x-content-type-options
    • https://arvow.com/youtube-video-to-blog-post → no x-content-type-options
    • https://arvow.com/autoblog → no x-content-type-options
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-agent → no x-content-type-options
    • https://arvow.com/google-review-automation → no x-content-type-options
    • https://arvow.com/gbp-posts-automation → no x-content-type-options
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-chat → no x-content-type-options
    • https://arvow.com/backlink-exchange → no x-content-type-options
    • https://arvow.com/llm-visibility-tracker → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://arvow.com/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-writer → no referrer-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-editor → no referrer-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-news-article-generator → no referrer-policy
    • https://arvow.com/youtube-video-to-blog-post → no referrer-policy
    • https://arvow.com/autoblog → no referrer-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-agent → no referrer-policy
    • https://arvow.com/google-review-automation → no referrer-policy
    • https://arvow.com/gbp-posts-automation → no referrer-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-chat → no referrer-policy
    • https://arvow.com/backlink-exchange → no referrer-policy
    • https://arvow.com/llm-visibility-tracker → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://arvow.com/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-writer → no permissions-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-editor → no permissions-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-news-article-generator → no permissions-policy
    • https://arvow.com/youtube-video-to-blog-post → no permissions-policy
    • https://arvow.com/autoblog → no permissions-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-agent → no permissions-policy
    • https://arvow.com/google-review-automation → no permissions-policy
    • https://arvow.com/gbp-posts-automation → no permissions-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-chat → no permissions-policy
    • https://arvow.com/backlink-exchange → no permissions-policy
    • https://arvow.com/llm-visibility-tracker → no permissions-policy
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 4 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • code.iconify.design (40 script tags)
    • fast.wistia.com (26 script tags)
    • server.fillout.com (1 script tag)
    • fast.wistia.net (1 script tag)
9 checks passed
  • OKHTTPS

    All 746 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKCookie flags

    All 1 cookie carry Secure, HttpOnly and SameSite flags.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    45 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near arvow.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling arvow.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own arvow.com?