Scanned sites / www.whipstone.com / 2026-09-14-0700

www.whipstone.com scan from 2026-09-14 07:00:01 UTC DR 27

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-14-0700

Scanned 2026-09-14 07:00:01 UTC, finished 2026-09-14 07:03:47 UTC. Found on page 2 of chatgpt for browser (api usage) results

Site: https://www.whipstone.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

85/ 100Good

On September 14, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 22 pages and 2 assets of www.whipstone.com, starting from https://www.whipstone.com/. It scored 85 out of 100, a good result. 11 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (9), meta descriptions (10), non-200 responses (2); 9 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−5), meta descriptions (−4.4), broken links (−1.1). 7 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium2 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
22
Assets fetched
2
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
11 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

24 of 26 discovered URLs were fetched, 2 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 29 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags9 issues
    9 of 16 pages have title issues. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −5 points
  • Meta descriptions10 issues
    10 of 16 pages have meta description issues. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.4 points
  • Headings1 issue
    1 of 16 pages have heading issues. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.3 points
  • Broken links1 issue
    2 internal links point at 1 broken URL.
    −1.1 points
  • Links to other sites37 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 3 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 29 destinations checked.
  • Redirects2 issues
    2 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.4 points
  • Non-200 responses2 issues
    4 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 4 of them are pages, 2 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −1.1 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability1 issue
    1 of 17 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 1 page noindex by design.
    −0.6 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 131 image references have no alt attribute. 54 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assetsOK
    0 assets larger than 500 KB among 2 fetched assets.
  • Orphan pages1 issue
    1 page have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.2 points
  • Sitemap coverage2 issues
    1 sitemap listing 16 URLs: 1 crawled page missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 1 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.7 points
  • Internal link counts1 noted
    Internal link counts for 18 pages; 1 worth a look.
  • Thin content1 issue
    1 of 16 pages have fewer than 200 words. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.4 points
  • Duplicate content2 issues
    1 group of pages with identical HTML.
    −0.9 points
  • URL formatOK
    All 22 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • Canonicals2 noted
    2 of 18 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives1 noted
    1 page carries a robots directive; 17 carry none.
  • Anchor text7 noted
    7 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure2 noted
    2 of 16 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt lengthOK
    No image is over 100 KB or carries alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 18 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 12 response headers recorded across 24 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 18 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 53 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2873 sites, median 80%, average 79%

www.whipstone.com scores 85%, higher than 70% of the 2873 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751500%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 43 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 80 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 132 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 128 sites81%: 125 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 119 sites84%: 130 sites85%: 106 sites86%: 95 sites87%: 96 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 75 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 59 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 29 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 15 sites96%: 18 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 8 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 150 sites85% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

There are several issues affecting your site's SEO, including broken links, redirects, and problems with title tags and meta descriptions. Addressing these will improve user experience and search visibility.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Broken links lead to a poor user experience and can negatively impact SEO.

    How: Update or remove links pointing to 'https://www.whipstone.com/real-talk-recipes-updates' from the homepage and 'https://www.whipstone.com/home'.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Redirects

    Why: Redirects can lead to confusion and hinder SEO performance.

    How: Fix the 301 redirect from 'http://whipstone.com/newsletters/' that points to a 404 page. Either update the destination URL or remove the redirect.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Correct Non-200 Responses

    Why: Non-200 responses like 404 errors negatively impact both user experience and SEO.

    How: Ensure that the URLs 'http://whipstone.com/newsletters/' and 'https://www.whipstone.com/real-talk-recipes-updates' return a valid page or redirect appropriately.

    Checks: status-codes

  4. 4

    Update Title Tags

    Why: Title tag issues can confuse both users and search engines, affecting click-through rates.

    How: Revise 9 title tags to ensure they are between 30-60 characters. For example, change 'Whipstone Farm' to a more descriptive title.

    Checks: titles

  5. 5

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: Missing or poorly written meta descriptions can reduce visibility in search results.

    How: Create meta descriptions for 10 pages that are concise, compelling, and under 160 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  6. 6

    Address Orphan Pages

    Why: Orphan pages aren't linked within your site, making them hard for users to find.

    How: Add internal links to the orphan page 'https://www.whipstone.com/home' from relevant pages on your site.

    Checks: orphan-pages

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The site has important security weaknesses including the absence of a Content Security Policy, which can allow harmful scripts, and missing Clickjacking protection on some pages. Mixed content is present, which may lead to security issues. Addressing these findings is essential for enhancing the site's resilience against various attacks.

  • 0 high
  • 2 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: Without a Content Security Policy, the site is vulnerable to XSS attacks.

    Fix: Add a Content-Security-Policy header, such as: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  2. 2

    Lack of Clickjacking ProtectionMedium

    Why it matters: Pages can be embedded in frames on malicious sites, risking user data.

    Fix: Include the X-Frame-Options header with: X-Frame-Options: DENY or SAMEORIGIN.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  3. 3

    Mixed Content IssuesLow

    Why it matters: Resources are loaded over HTTP, reducing security for HTTPS pages.

    Fix: Change URLs to load resources over HTTPS instead of HTTP.

    Evidence: Mixed content

  4. 4

    Unrestricted Third-Party ScriptsLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from external domains can be compromised, affecting site integrity.

    Fix: Implement Subresource Integrity or use a Content-Security-Policy that restricts script sources.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  5. 5

    Sensitive Path Listed in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: Publicly listing private paths may expose sensitive areas to attackers.

    Fix: Remove or restrict access to the disallowed path in the robots.txt file: Disallow: /config

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 18 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://www.whipstone.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.whipstone.com/cart → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.whipstone.com/our-story → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.whipstone.com/press → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.whipstone.com/work-with-us → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.whipstone.com/where-to-find-us → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.whipstone.com/wholesale-flowers-local-vegetable-in-arizona → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.whipstone.com/blog → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.whipstone.com/contact → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.whipstone.com/csa-signup → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.whipstone.com/blog/when-the-stars-align-3bgda → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.whipstone.com/blog/when-the-stars-align → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    17 of 18 HTML pages send x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.whipstone.com/cart → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMixed contentLow

    8 resources on HTTPS pages are loaded over plain HTTP.

    • https://www.whipstone.com/wholesale-flowers-local-vegetable-in-arizona loads image http://static1.squarespace.com/static/6973d53e32fe4d0ed5b80bc3/t/6a190659905a751a0904fe32…
    • https://www.whipstone.com/blog/when-the-stars-align-3bgda loads image http://static1.squarespace.com/static/6973d53e32fe4d0ed5b80bc3/69c83d9a8e28846cb52ee380/6…
    • https://www.whipstone.com/blog/when-the-stars-align loads image http://static1.squarespace.com/static/6973d53e32fe4d0ed5b80bc3/69c83d9a8e28846cb52ee380/6…
    • https://www.whipstone.com/blog/happy-new-year loads image http://static1.squarespace.com/static/6973d53e32fe4d0ed5b80bc3/69c83d9a8e28846cb52ee380/6…
    • https://www.whipstone.com/blog/is-csa-right-for-me loads image http://static1.squarespace.com/static/6973d53e32fe4d0ed5b80bc3/69c83d9a8e28846cb52ee380/6…
    • https://www.whipstone.com/blog/fresh-flower-care loads image http://static1.squarespace.com/static/6973d53e32fe4d0ed5b80bc3/69c83d9a8e28846cb52ee380/6…
    • https://www.whipstone.com/blog/wrapping-up-fall loads image http://static1.squarespace.com/static/6973d53e32fe4d0ed5b80bc3/69c83d9a8e28846cb52ee380/6…
    • https://www.whipstone.com/blog/more-of-this loads image http://static1.squarespace.com/static/6973d53e32fe4d0ed5b80bc3/69c83d9a8e28846cb52ee380/6…
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 3 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • assets.squarespace.com (198 script tags)
    • definitions.sqspcdn.com (159 script tags)
    • static1.squarespace.com (11 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /config
7 checks passed, 4 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 18 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 18 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 18 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    2 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    No recognisable library versions were found in the sampled scripts.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.whipstone.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.whipstone.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.whipstone.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.whipstone.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.