Scanned sites / dircks.com
SEO report for dircks.com DR 24
The latest Site Spider scan of dircks.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/dircks-com/2026-09-14-0900.
DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.
Latest scan
Scanned 2026-09-14 09:00:02 UTC, finished 2026-09-14 09:50:01 UTC. Found on page 2 of chatgpt for browser (api usage) results
Site: https://dircks.com/
Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.
On September 14, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 394 pages and 967 assets of dircks.com, starting from https://dircks.com/. It scored 85 out of 100, a good result. 10 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (65), redirects (146), links to other sites (13); 9 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), redirects (−2.4), links to other sites (−2.1). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.
Security review: Medium3 medium and 1 low findings. See the security findings ↓
- Pages crawled
- 394
- Assets fetched
- 967
- Status
- Completed
- Checks with issues
- 10 of 27
1,361 of 1,361 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 134 link destinations on other sites were checked.
- Title tags29 issues29 of 214 pages have title issues. 34 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−1.2 points
- Meta descriptions60 issues60 of 214 pages have meta description issues. 34 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−1.9 points
- HeadingsOK0 of 214 pages have heading issues. 34 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Broken links1 issue1 internal link point at 1 broken URL.−0.1 points
- Links to other sites13 issues13 destinations answered with an error, 43 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 104 destinations checked.−2.1 points
- Redirects146 issues146 redirecting URLs, 1 of them chained.−2.4 points
- Non-200 responses1 issue148 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 146 of them are pages, 1 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
- Rate limitedOKThe site did not rate limit the crawler.
- Indexability12 issues12 of 226 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 22 pages noindex by design.−0.5 points
- Image alt textOK0 of 2593 image references have no alt attribute. 130 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
- Heavy assets65 issues65 assets larger than 500 KB among 967 fetched assets. 18 documents over that size are listed but not counted: downloads are not page weight.−6 points
- Orphan pages12 issues12 pages have no internal links pointing at them.−0.2 points
- Sitemap coverage23 issues7 sitemaps listing 191 URLs: 23 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.−0.6 points
- Internal link counts34 notedInternal link counts for 248 pages; 34 worth a look.
- Thin contentOK0 of 214 pages have fewer than 200 words. 34 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Duplicate contentOK0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
- URL format125 noted125 of 394 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
- Canonicals34 noted34 of 248 pages have a canonical worth checking.
- Robots directives248 noted248 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
- Anchor text29 noted29 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
- Title and heading structure156 noted156 of 214 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 34 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Image weight and alt length56 noted56 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
- Response anomaliesOKNo redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
- HTML and head validationNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- hreflangNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- Structured dataNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- Near duplicatesNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- Soft 404sOKNone of 248 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
- AccessibilityNot checkedNot checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
- Link positionsNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
- PaginationNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- Headers and cookiesOK0 cookies set by the site; 16 response headers recorded across 1361 URLs.
- Orphans in searchNot checkedNot checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
- Link ScoreOKLink Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 248 pages; 27 hold almost none (10 or less).
- JavaScript renderingNot checkedNot checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
- PageSpeed Insights5 notedMobile performance 57 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
- SpellingNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
Where this site sits among all scanned sites
2873 sites, median 80%, average 79%
dircks.com scores 85%, higher than 70% of the 2873 scanned sites. See the full ranking.
Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).
Internal link map
Loading the link map...
Fix plan
Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findingsWritten from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.
Your website has some technical SEO issues, including broken links, redirect chains, and problems with title tags and meta descriptions. Addressing these will improve user experience and SEO performance.
- 1
Fix Broken Links
Why: One broken internal link can affect user experience and crawl efficiency.
How: Update the link on https://dircks.com/business-moving/office-moves/ to point to a valid URL.
Checks: broken-links
- 2
Resolve Redirect Chains
Why: Chained redirects can slow down page loading times and impact SEO.
How: Update the redirect from https://dircks.com/contact/claim-form/ to point directly to the final URL https://dircks.com/claims/.
Checks: redirects
- 3
Fix Non-200 Responses
Why: 148 URLs returning non-200 responses can hurt visibility and accessibility.
How: Identify the non-200 URLs and change their statuses to 200 by correcting or removing them.
Checks: status-codes
- 4
Improve Title Tags
Why: 29 pages have title issues that can hurt click-through rates.
How: Revise titles for affected pages, ensuring they are unique and relevant to the content.
Checks: titles
- 5
Enhance Meta Descriptions
Why: Duplicate meta descriptions on 36 pages can reduce SEO effectiveness.
How: Create unique meta descriptions for impacted pages, ensuring they concisely summarize each page's content.
Checks: meta-descriptions
- 6
Link to Orphan Pages
Why: 12 orphan pages lack internal links, making them difficult to discover.
How: Add internal links from relevant pages to these orphan pages to improve their visibility.
Checks: orphan-pages
Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.
Security review
Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawlYour website lacks critical security measures, including a Content Security Policy, and uses outdated JavaScript libraries with known vulnerabilities. These issues could expose your site to attacks or data breaches. Immediate action is needed to enhance your security.
- 0 high
- 3 medium
- 1 low
- 0 info
- 1
Missing Content Security PolicyMedium
Why it matters: Without a Content Security Policy, the site is vulnerable to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) attacks.
Fix: Implement a Content Security Policy header: `Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';`.
Evidence: Content Security Policy
- 2
Vulnerable jQuery VersionMedium
Why it matters: jQuery 2.1.0 has multiple known vulnerabilities that could be exploited.
Fix: Upgrade jQuery to at least version 3.5.0.
Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries
- 3
Vulnerable Bootstrap VersionMedium
Why it matters: Bootstrap 3.3.5 is outdated and has significant vulnerabilities that may be exploited.
Fix: Upgrade Bootstrap to at least version 3.4.1.
Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries
- 4
Third-Party Scripts Lack Subresource IntegrityLow
Why it matters: Scripts from other domains could be manipulated to execute malicious code on your site.
Fix: Use Subresource Integrity for these scripts, or implement a strict Content Security Policy that lists trusted hosts.
Evidence: Third-party scripts
What the checks found
- FoundContent Security PolicyMedium
None of the 248 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.
- https://dircks.com/ → no content-security-policy
- https://dircks.com/home-moving/ → no content-security-policy
- https://dircks.com/home-moving/local-moving/ → no content-security-policy
- https://dircks.com/home-moving/cross-country/ → no content-security-policy
- https://dircks.com/home-moving/international-moves/ → no content-security-policy
- https://dircks.com/home-moving/packing-services/ → no content-security-policy
- https://dircks.com/home-moving/storage-and-warehousing/ → no content-security-policy
- https://dircks.com/home-moving/personalized-moves/ → no content-security-policy
- https://dircks.com/home-moving/auto-transport/ → no content-security-policy
- https://dircks.com/home-moving/faq/ → no content-security-policy
- https://dircks.com/home-moving/move-concierge-services/ → no content-security-policy
- https://dircks.com/areas-served/ → no content-security-policy
- FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium
2 libraries with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 2.1.0, Bootstrap 3.3.5. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.
- jQuery 2.1.0 in https://dircks.com/wp-content/themes/g5plus-moveco/assets/js/plugin.js?ver=7.0.4: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
- Bootstrap 3.3.5 in https://dircks.com/wp-content/themes/g5plus-moveco/assets/plugins/bootstrap/js/…: CVE-2016-10735, CVE-2018-14040, CVE-2018-14041, CVE-2018-14042, CVE-2019-8331 (XSS through data attributes in tooltip, popover, collapse and scrollspy); fixed in 3.4.1
- NoteThird-party scripts
Scripts run from 3 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)
- link.msgsndr.com (27 script tags)
- conciergeapi.moveeasy.com (1 script tag)
- recruitingbypaycor.com (1 script tag)
10 checks passed, 3 not applicable
- OKHTTPS
All 248 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.
- OKHTTP Strict Transport Security
strict-transport-security is set on all 248 HTML pages.
- OKClickjacking protection
x-frame-options is set on all 248 HTML pages.
- OKMIME sniffing protection
x-content-type-options is set on all 248 HTML pages.
- OKSoftware version disclosure
The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.
- OKMixed content
No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.
- OKForms over HTTPS
40 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.
- OKKeys and secrets in page code
No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.
- OKExposed files and listings
None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.
- OKSensitive paths in robots.txt
robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.
- Not applicableReferrer policy
This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.
- Not applicablePermissions policy
This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.
- Not applicableCookie flags
This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.
A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.
Earlier scans of dircks.com
No other scans of this site yet.
Sites scoring near dircks.com
Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.
- winnipegbodysugaring.meDR 085/100 · rank 768 · 213 pages
- leagueyyc.comDR 485/100 · rank 768 · 1 page
- tallgrassbakery.caDR 2285/100 · rank 768 · 334 pages
- www.whipstone.comDR 2785/100 · rank 768 · 22 pages
- landscapingcalgary.orgDR 1885/100 · rank 768 · 324 pages
- raybernmotors.comDR 685/100 · rank 768 · 29 pages
DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.
This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling dircks.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.
Own dircks.com?
- Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
- Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming dircks.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.