Scanned sites / www.tsoralhealth.com / 2026-10-09-0254

www.tsoralhealth.com scan from 10/9/2026, 2:54:16 AM DR 6

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-10-09-0254

Scanned 10/9/2026, 2:54:16 AM, finished 10/9/2026, 2:58:23 AM. Found with openstreetmap overpass

Site: https://www.tsoralhealth.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

82/ 100Good

On October 9, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 43 pages and 91 assets of www.tsoralhealth.com, starting from https://www.tsoralhealth.com/. It scored 82 out of 100, a good result. 9 of 23 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (25), image alt text (5), title tags (8); 7 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−6.7), image alt text (−3.8), title tags (−2.7). 7 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Low2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
43
Assets fetched
91
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
9 of 23
CoverageComplete crawl

134 of 135 discovered URLs were fetched, 1 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 29 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags8 issues
    8 of 29 pages have title issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −2.7 points
  • Meta descriptions25 issues
    25 of 29 pages have meta description issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −6.7 points
  • Headings1 issue
    1 of 29 pages have heading issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −0.2 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites56 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 26 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 29 destinations checked.
  • Redirects15 issues
    13 redirecting URLs, 4 of them chained.
    −2 points
  • Non-200 responses14 noted
    14 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 13 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 29 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 1 page noindex by design.
  • Image alt text5 issues
    5 of 8 image references have no alt attribute. 2 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
    −3.8 points
  • Heavy assets1 issue
    1 asset larger than 500 KB among 91 fetched assets.
    −0.6 points
  • Orphan pages4 issues
    4 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.5 points
  • Sitemap coverage5 issues
    1 sitemap listing 28 URLs: 1 crawled page missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 4 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −1 points
  • Internal link counts1 noted
    Internal link counts for 30 pages; 1 worth a look.
  • Thin content2 issues
    2 of 29 pages have fewer than 200 words. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −0.5 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL formatOK
    All 43 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 30 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives30 noted
    30 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text3 noted
    3 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure16 noted
    16 of 29 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length1 noted
    1 image over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2169 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.tsoralhealth.com scores 82%, higher than 61% of the 2169 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0551090%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 0 sites10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 1 site28%: 0 sites29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 2 sites41%: 2 sites42%: 0 sites43%: 2 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 6 sites47%: 4 sites48%: 4 sites49%: 4 sites50%: 4 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 9 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 8 sites56%: 7 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 16 sites59%: 6 sites60%: 14 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 24 sites64%: 18 sites65%: 37 sites66%: 29 sites67%: 33 sites68%: 33 sites69%: 38 sites70%: 42 sites71%: 66 sites72%: 73 sites73%: 67 sites74%: 60 sites75%: 75 sites76%: 80 sites77%: 91 sites78%: 98 sites79%: 87 sites80%: 103 sites81%: 101 sites82%: 109 sites83%: 91 sites84%: 99 sites85%: 73 sites86%: 68 sites87%: 63 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 57 sites90%: 33 sites91%: 40 sites92%: 27 sites93%: 22 sites94%: 13 sites95%: 7 sites96%: 5 sites97%: 11 sites98%: 2 sites99%: 1 site100%: 62 sites82% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

The website has several SEO issues that require attention, particularly with redirects, meta descriptions, and title tags. Implementing these fixes will improve site visibility and user experience.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Chained redirects can harm SEO and user experience.

    How: Eliminate unnecessary redirect chains, ensuring each URL maps directly to its final destination.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Address Non-200 Responses

    Why: Fixing non-200 responses improves user access and SEO metrics.

    How: Review the URLs that return non-200 responses and ensure they return a 200 status or are removed.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Improve Title Tags

    Why: Optimizing title tags enhances relevance and search visibility.

    How: Revise the eight pages with title issues to comply with recommended length (50-60 characters).

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Enhance Meta Descriptions

    Why: Meta descriptions influence click-through rates from search results.

    How: Create engaging meta descriptions for the 25 pages identified as having issues.

    Evidence: 18 pages have no meta description at all.

    18 pages affected

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Add Alt Text to Images

    Why: Alt text improves accessibility and SEO.

    How: Provide descriptive alt text for the five images missing alt attributes.

    Checks: images-alt

  6. 6

    Link Orphan Pages Internally

    Why: Orphan pages lack visibility and can reduce site authority.

    How: Add internal links to the orphan pages from relevant areas on the site.

    Checks: orphan-pages

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website has some security vulnerabilities related to server information disclosure and the use of third-party scripts. Additionally, sensitive paths are exposed in the robots.txt file. Addressing these issues can enhance overall site security.

  • 0 high
  • 0 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Software Version DisclosureLow

    Why it matters: Revealing server or framework versions assists attackers in identifying known vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Remove or obscure the 'Server' and 'X-Powered-By' headers to prevent version disclosure.

    Evidence: Software version disclosure

  2. 2

    Third-party Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Using external scripts without integrity checks makes the site vulnerable if any third-party source is compromised.

    Fix: Implement Subresource Integrity (SRI) for external scripts or apply a Content Security Policy (CSP) for added security.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  3. 3

    Sensitive Paths in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The exposed '/wp-admin/' path could inform potential attackers about sensitive areas of your site.

    Fix: Consider improving access controls and removing this path from robots.txt or restricting access altogether.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundSoftware version disclosureLow

    Responses reveal the exact server or framework version, which lets an attacker look up known vulnerabilities for it without guessing.

    • server: cloudflare (134 responses)
    • x-powered-by: WP Rocket/3.21.1 (2 responses)
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 4 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (30 script tags)
    • ajax.googleapis.com (30 script tags)
    • www.google.com (31 script tags)
    • form.jotform.com (1 script tag)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
10 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 30 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 30 HTML pages.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 30 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 30 HTML pages.

  • OKReferrer policy

    referrer-policy is set on all 30 HTML pages.

  • OKPermissions policy

    permissions-policy is set on all 30 HTML pages.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    The crawl set no cookies, so there are no cookie flags to check.

  • Not applicableForms over HTTPS

    No forms were found on the sampled pages.

  • Not applicableVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    No recognisable library versions were found in the sampled scripts.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.tsoralhealth.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.tsoralhealth.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.tsoralhealth.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.tsoralhealth.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.
www.tsoralhealth.com scan 2026-10-09-0254 | DIY SEO Hub