Scanned sites / www.studiolotusyoga.com / 2026-09-12-1811

www.studiolotusyoga.com scan from 2026-09-12 18:11:57 UTC DR 21

A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.studiolotusyoga.com.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-12-1811

Scanned 2026-09-12 18:11:57 UTC, finished 2026-09-12 19:32:09 UTC. Found on page 5 of brave web search results

Site: https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

76/ 100Good

On September 12, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 63 pages and 442 assets of www.studiolotusyoga.com, starting from https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/. It scored 76 out of 100, a good result. 10 of 26 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (39), title tags (30), meta descriptions (36); 8 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), title tags (−4.8), meta descriptions (−4.6). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 11 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium2 medium and 2 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
63
Assets fetched
442
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
10 of 26
CoverageComplete crawl

505 of 505 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 42 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags30 issues
    30 of 42 pages have title issues. 20 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.8 points
  • Meta descriptions36 issues
    36 of 42 pages have meta description issues. 20 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.6 points
  • Headings24 issues
    24 of 42 pages have heading issues. 20 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.3 points
  • Broken links1 issue
    1 internal link point at 1 broken URL.
    −0.3 points
  • Links to other sites1 issue
    1 destination answered with an error, 36 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 41 destinations checked.
    −0.4 points
  • Redirects1 noted
    1 redirecting URL, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responses1 issue
    3 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 1 of them is a page, 1 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.2 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 42 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 20 pages noindex by design.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 244 image references have no alt attribute. 81 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets39 issues
    39 assets larger than 500 KB among 442 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages29 issues
    29 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −1.9 points
  • Sitemap coverage29 issues
    5 sitemaps listing 42 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 29 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −2.8 points
  • Internal link counts20 noted
    Internal link counts for 62 pages; 20 worth a look.
  • Thin content8 issues
    8 of 42 pages have fewer than 200 words. 20 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format19 noted
    19 of 63 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals20 noted
    20 of 62 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives62 noted
    62 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text19 noted
    19 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure29 noted
    29 of 42 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 20 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length28 noted
    28 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 62 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 14 response headers recorded across 505 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 62 pages; 29 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2332 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.studiolotusyoga.com scores 76%, higher than 35% of the 2332 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581150%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 7 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 31 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 70 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 85 sites80%: 108 sites81%: 104 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 106 sites85%: 86 sites86%: 70 sites87%: 75 sites88%: 58 sites89%: 64 sites90%: 34 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 11 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 69 sites76% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your website has several issues that can be improved, including fixing broken links and enhancing meta descriptions. Prioritize addressing these issues for better SEO performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Link

    Why: Improving user experience and SEO by removing dead links.

    How: Update or remove the broken link on the URL: https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/infrared-saunas-boise/.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Repair Non-200 Responses

    Why: Ensure all pages and assets are accessible for visitors and search engines.

    How: Fix 404 errors on https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/cold-plunge-sauna-pricing/ and the image at https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/wp-content/plugins/modern-events-calendar/assets/packages/owl-carousel/owl.video.play.png.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Edit Title Tags

    Why: Optimizing titles can improve click-through rates from search results.

    How: Rewrite titles for pages with more than 60 characters; e.g., shorten title on https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/about-us/.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: Meta descriptions encourage users to click your links in search results.

    How: Add compelling meta descriptions for pages that are missing them, like https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/asp-products/5-class-card/.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Resolve Heading Issues

    Why: Proper heading structure helps with SEO and user engagement.

    How: Ensure each page has a single, clear H1 tag, particularly for https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Link to Orphan Pages

    Why: Connecting orphan pages improves their visibility and search performance.

    How: Add internal links to orphaned pages like https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/asp-products/single-class/ from relevant sections.

    Checks: orphan-pages

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website has several security issues that need immediate attention. Key missing headers expose users to potential risks like interception and clickjacking. It's important to implement strict transport security, clickjacking protection, and MIME type checking. Additionally, caution is advised with third-party scripts that lack integrity checks.

  • 0 high
  • 2 medium
  • 2 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users typing the address without https:// may be intercepted.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Absence of this header allows pages to be clicked through an invisible frame, posing clickjacking risks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  3. 3

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Lack of this header can lead to browsers incorrectly interpreting file types and executing malicious scripts.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  4. 4

    Third-Party Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from other domains could be compromised, risking your site security.

    Fix: Implement Subresource Integrity (SRI) for external scripts where possible, or use a Content-Security-Policy to control their sources.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/our-classes/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/pricing/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/our-events/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/retreats-2/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/teacher-training/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/private-events/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/about-us/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/faqs/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/studio/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/bown-crossing-yoga/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/contact/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    20 of 62 HTML pages send x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/our-classes/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/pricing/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/our-events/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/retreats-2/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/teacher-training/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/private-events/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/about-us/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/faqs/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/studio/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/bown-crossing-yoga/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/contact/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/our-classes/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/pricing/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/our-events/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/retreats-2/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/teacher-training/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/private-events/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/about-us/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/faqs/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/studio/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/bown-crossing-yoga/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/contact/ → no x-content-type-options
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 4 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • www.google.com (40 script tags)
    • cdn.trustindex.io (1 script tag)
    • momence.com (2 script tags)
9 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 62 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set on 20 of 62 pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    7 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.studiolotusyoga.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.studiolotusyoga.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.studiolotusyoga.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.studiolotusyoga.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.