Scanned sites / www.studiolotusyoga.com

SEO report for www.studiolotusyoga.com DR 21

The latest Site Spider scan of www.studiolotusyoga.com, with 2 scans on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/www-studiolotusyoga-com/2026-10-01-2052.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-10-01 20:52:08 UTC, finished 2026-10-01 22:37:31 UTC. Found on page 3 of brave web search results

Site: https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

76/ 100Good

On October 1, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 71 pages and 445 assets of www.studiolotusyoga.com, starting from https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/. It scored 76 out of 100, a good result. 11 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (39), title tags (32), meta descriptions (39); 7 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), title tags (−4.6), meta descriptions (−4.5). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
71
Assets fetched
445
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
11 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

516 of 516 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 42 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags32 issues
    32 of 47 pages have title issues. 22 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.6 points
  • Meta descriptions39 issues
    39 of 47 pages have meta description issues. 22 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.5 points
  • Headings24 issues
    24 of 47 pages have heading issues. 22 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.1 points
  • Broken links1 issue
    1 internal link point at 1 broken URL.
    −0.3 points
  • Links to other sites1 issue
    1 destination answered with an error, 35 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 42 destinations checked.
    −0.4 points
  • Redirects1 issue
    2 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.1 points
  • Non-200 responses1 issue
    4 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 2 of them are pages, 1 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.1 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 47 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 22 pages noindex by design.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 264 image references have no alt attribute. 91 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets39 issues
    39 assets larger than 500 KB among 445 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages32 issues
    32 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −1.9 points
  • Sitemap coverage32 issues
    8 sitemaps listing 47 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 32 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −2.8 points
  • Internal link counts22 noted
    Internal link counts for 69 pages; 22 worth a look.
  • Thin content7 issues
    7 of 47 pages have fewer than 200 words. 22 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.8 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format21 noted
    21 of 71 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals22 noted
    22 of 69 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives69 noted
    69 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text22 noted
    22 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure32 noted
    32 of 47 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 22 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length28 noted
    28 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 69 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookies2 noted
    2 cookies set by the site, 2 missing a protective flag; 15 response headers recorded across 516 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 69 pages; 52 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 50 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

What changed since the last scan

Score unchanged

www.studiolotusyoga.com scored 76 out of 100 in both of its last two scans. That is a steady score, not an unchanged site: 23 findings changed between the two scans. 17 URLs the earlier crawl reached were not reached this time. The crawl reached 8 more pages than last time, 71 in total, so some of the change is a change in what was crawled.

  • Pages: 7 new
  • Page status codes: 1 new
  • Redirects: 1 new
  • Internal links to the page: 14 changed
  • 17 URLs from the earlier crawl were not reached this time
  1. 2026-09-12 18:11:57 UTC76/10063 pages
  2. 2026-10-01 20:52:08 UTC76/10071 pages

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2331 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.studiolotusyoga.com scores 76%, higher than 35% of the 2331 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581150%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 7 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 31 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 70 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 107 sites79%: 84 sites80%: 107 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 106 sites85%: 85 sites86%: 70 sites87%: 75 sites88%: 58 sites89%: 64 sites90%: 34 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 11 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 69 sites76% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis (rules v4). The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Some minor technical issues need addressing, including broken links and several issues with meta descriptions. Improving these aspects will enhance user experience and SEO performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Link

    Why: This link leads to a 404 page, impacting user experience.

    How: Update the link on the source page to point to the correct URL.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Address Non-200 Responses

    Why: 4 URLs returning errors can harm SEO and user experience.

    How: Identify the URLs and implement redirects or restore the missing pages.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Add Missing Meta Descriptions

    Why: 39 pages are missing meta descriptions, affecting search visibility.

    How: Create and assign relevant meta descriptions for the affected pages.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  4. 4

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: 32 pages have title issues negatively impacting SEO.

    How: Review and edit titles to ensure they are relevant and within optimal character limits.

    Checks: titles

  5. 5

    Resolve Heading Issues

    Why: 24 pages with heading issues can hinder content hierarchy.

    How: Ensure each page has one H1 and relevant H2s for better structure.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Reduce Heavy Assets

    Why: 39 assets larger than 500 KB can slow down page load times.

    How: Optimize images and scripts to reduce their size, improving performance.

    Evidence: 550 KB of stylesheet, loaded by 47 pages, so every visitor to any of them downloads it.

    47 pages affected

    Depends on: If it is a download rather than part of the page, weight matters less; move it out of the page instead.

    Checks: heavy-assets

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website has several important security issues related to response headers and cookies. Addressing these will help protect your users from potential attacks and data leaks. Focus on securing transport, policies, and cookie settings as outlined in the findings below.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users may be exposed to potential man-in-the-middle attacks when using www.studiolotusyoga.com.

    Fix: Add the following header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing X-Frame-OptionsMedium

    Why it matters: Lack of X-Frame-Options makes your site vulnerable to clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the following header: X-Frame-Options: DENY

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  3. 3

    Cookies missing protective flagsMedium

    Why it matters: Without proper flags, cookies can be more vulnerable to theft and misuse.

    Fix: Set Secure, HttpOnly, and SameSite flags for asp_transient_id and SameSite for wordpress_test_cookie.

    Evidence: Cookie flags

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-OptionsLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers may execute files incorrectly, leading to vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Add the following header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Missing Referrer-PolicyLow

    Why it matters: Absence of a Referrer-Policy can expose sensitive URL information to third-party sites.

    Fix: Add the following header: Referrer-Policy: no-referrer

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  6. 6

    Missing Permissions-PolicyInfo

    Why it matters: A permissions policy can limit features that the site doesn't use, enhancing security.

    Fix: Add the following header: Permissions-Policy: geo-timestamp=(), microphone=(), camera=()

    Evidence: Permissions policy

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/our-classes/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/pricing/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/our-events/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/retreats-2/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/teacher-training/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/private-events/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/about-us/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/faqs/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/studio/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/bown-crossing-yoga/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/contact/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    22 of 69 HTML pages send x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/our-classes/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/pricing/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/our-events/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/retreats-2/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/teacher-training/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/private-events/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/about-us/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/faqs/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/studio/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/bown-crossing-yoga/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/contact/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/our-classes/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/pricing/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/our-events/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/retreats-2/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/teacher-training/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/private-events/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/about-us/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/faqs/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/studio/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/bown-crossing-yoga/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/contact/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    22 of 69 HTML pages send referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/our-classes/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/pricing/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/our-events/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/retreats-2/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/teacher-training/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/private-events/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/about-us/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/faqs/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/studio/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/bown-crossing-yoga/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/contact/ → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/our-classes/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/pricing/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/our-events/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/retreats-2/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/teacher-training/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/private-events/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/about-us/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/faqs/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/studio/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/bown-crossing-yoga/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/contact/ → no permissions-policy
  • FoundCookie flagsMedium

    2 of 2 cookies are missing protective flags. Without HttpOnly a script can read the cookie; without Secure it travels over plain HTTP; without SameSite it is sent on cross-site requests.

    • asp_transient_id (set by https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/robots.txt) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • wordpress_test_cookie (set by https://www.studiolotusyoga.com/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.stud…) lacks SameSite
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 4 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • www.google.com (40 script tags)
    • cdn.trustindex.io (1 script tag)
    • momence.com (2 script tags)
9 checks passed
  • OKHTTPS

    All 69 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set on 22 of 69 pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    7 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of www.studiolotusyoga.com

Sites scoring near www.studiolotusyoga.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.studiolotusyoga.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.studiolotusyoga.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.studiolotusyoga.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.