Scanned sites / www.studio1rpdance.com / 2026-11-01-2201

www.studio1rpdance.com scan from 2026-11-01 22:01:26 UTC DR 1

A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.studio1rpdance.com.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-11-01-2201

Scanned 2026-11-01 22:01:26 UTC, finished 2026-11-03 03:02:43 UTC. Found on page 1 of brave web search results

Site: https://www.studio1rpdance.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

57/ 100Needs work

On November 1, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 329 pages and 409 assets of www.studio1rpdance.com, starting from https://www.studio1rpdance.com/. It scored 57 out of 100, a result that needs work. 10 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by broken links (202), non-200 responses (202), duplicate content (154); 11 checks passed. Most of the points went to broken links (−20), non-200 responses (−10), duplicate content (−8). 12 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium1 medium, 1 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
329
Assets fetched
409
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
10 of 33
CoverageComplete crawl

738 of 738 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 29 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags1 issue
    1 of 24 pages have title issues. 86 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.1 points
  • Meta descriptions9 issues
    9 of 24 pages have meta description issues. 86 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.7 points
  • HeadingsOK
    0 of 24 pages have heading issues. 86 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Broken links202 issues
    207 internal links point at 202 broken URLs.
    −20 points
  • Links to other sites327 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 6 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 29 destinations checked.
  • Redirects17 issues
    18 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.6 points
  • Non-200 responses202 issues
    221 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 219 of them are pages, 202 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −10 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability1 issue
    1 of 24 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 86 pages noindex by design.
    −0.1 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 260 image references have no alt attribute. 213 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets1 issue
    1 asset larger than 500 KB among 409 fetched assets.
    −0.6 points
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage55 issues
    No sitemap found. Tried: https://www.studio1rpdance.com/sitemap.xml (301), https://www.studio1rpdance.com/sitemap_index.xml (503). Add one at /sitemap.xml or list it in robots.txt.
    −3 points
  • Internal link counts86 noted
    Internal link counts for 110 pages; 86 worth a look.
  • Thin content1 issue
    1 of 24 pages have fewer than 200 words. 86 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.1 points
  • Duplicate content154 issues
    2 groups of pages with identical HTML.
    −8 points
  • URL format109 noted
    109 of 329 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 110 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives110 noted
    110 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text226 noted
    226 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure4 noted
    4 of 24 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 86 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length11 noted
    11 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies1 noted
    1 URL answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validation24 noted
    24 of 110 pages have HTML problems: 0 with head tags outside <head>, 0 over 2 MB.
  • hreflangOK
    No page declares hreflang.
  • Structured dataOK
    110 of 24 indexable pages carry structured data: BreadcrumbList (110), ListItem (110), WebSite (110), Organization (110), WebPage (110). 0 pages with errors a rich result would fail on.
  • Near duplicates2 noted
    2 pages in 1 group read almost the same as another page (95% alike or more).
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 110 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positions8 noted
    8 of 24 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
  • PaginationOK
    No page declares rel=next or rel=prev pagination.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 17 response headers recorded across 738 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 110 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • Spelling5 noted
    5 words an English dictionary does not know, on 4 pages. Product names and jargon will appear here too.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2673 sites, median 80%, average 78%

www.studio1rpdance.com scores 57%, higher than 4% of the 2673 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0621230%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 6 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 10 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 7 sites57%: 16 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 39 sites67%: 40 sites68%: 38 sites69%: 49 sites70%: 47 sites71%: 75 sites72%: 74 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 77 sites75%: 86 sites76%: 96 sites77%: 106 sites78%: 121 sites79%: 109 sites80%: 122 sites81%: 120 sites82%: 120 sites83%: 119 sites84%: 123 sites85%: 101 sites86%: 89 sites87%: 91 sites88%: 75 sites89%: 73 sites90%: 50 sites91%: 56 sites92%: 39 sites93%: 28 sites94%: 22 sites95%: 14 sites96%: 17 sites97%: 15 sites98%: 7 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 69 sites57% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Your site has several critical issues, especially broken links and non-200 responses that need addressing to improve performance. Follow the prioritized fixes below for better SEO.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Broken links hinder user experience and SEO rankings.

    How: Review and either remove or update the links pointing to broken URLs as listed in the findings.

    Evidence: https://www.studio1rpdance.com/?post_type=us_testimonial&p=… answers 404, and 3 pages link to it with anchor text such as "<img decoding="async" width="150" heigh…".

    3 pages affected

    Depends on: If the destination was deleted on purpose, remove the links rather than redirecting to an unrelated page.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: Non-200 response statuses affect site accessibility and rankings.

    How: Identify and fix the URLs returning non-200 responses by correcting their structure or ensuring the pages are live.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Create Sitemap

    Why: A sitemap aids search engines in indexing your pages effectively.

    How: Generate a sitemap and ensure it is accessible at /sitemap.xml. Include it in the robots.txt file.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

  4. 4

    Fix Title Issues

    Why: Proper titles improve both user engagement and search rankings.

    How: Update the title on the affected page to be under 60 characters without losing relevance.

    Checks: titles

  5. 5

    Correct Meta Descriptions

    Why: Meta descriptions guide click-through rates from search results.

    How: Add or revise the meta descriptions on pages with issues, ensuring they are concise and relevant.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  6. 6

    Address Thin Content

    Why: Content depth impacts SEO; thin content sites rank lower.

    How: Expand the content on the affected page to meet a minimum of 200 words, focusing on relevant keywords.

    Checks: thin-content

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website has several security issues that may expose it to risks. High-priority findings include the absence of a Permissions-Policy header, which could limit the impact of malicious scripts. A Content Security Policy is present but is weak due to the allowance of inline scripts. Additionally, third-party scripts are running without proper integrity checks.

  • 0 high
  • 1 medium
  • 1 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Weak Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: The CSP allows 'unsafe-inline' and 'unsafe-eval', reducing its effectiveness against XSS attacks.

    Fix: Update the CSP to remove 'unsafe-inline' and 'unsafe-eval'. Example: Content-Security-Policy: default-src https:; script-src https:; object-src 'none';

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  2. 2

    Third-Party Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from an external domain can be compromised, potentially leading to security risks.

    Fix: Implement Subresource Integrity for scripts or limit their use with a stricter CSP. Example for CSP: script-src 'self' link.msgsndr.com;

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  3. 3

    Missing Permissions-Policy HeaderInfo

    Why it matters: No Permissions-Policy header restricts browser features, allowing potential script misuse.

    Fix: Add the header: Permissions-Policy: interest-cohort=() to all HTML pages.

    Evidence: Permissions policy

What the checks found

  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://www.studio1rpdance.com/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.studio1rpdance.com/about/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.studio1rpdance.com/locations/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.studio1rpdance.com/dance-classes/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.studio1rpdance.com/class-schedule/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.studio1rpdance.com/class-attire/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.studio1rpdance.com/classes/classical-ballet/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.studio1rpdance.com/classes/jazz/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.studio1rpdance.com/classes/tap/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.studio1rpdance.com/classes/contemporary/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.studio1rpdance.com/classes/hip-hop/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.studio1rpdance.com/classes/lyrical/ → no permissions-policy
  • NoteContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, but it allows inline or eval scripts ('unsafe-inline' / 'unsafe-eval'), which removes most of its protection against injected scripts.

    • https://www.studio1rpdance.com/ → default-src 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:;
    • https://www.studio1rpdance.com/about/ → default-src 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:;
    • https://www.studio1rpdance.com/locations/ → default-src 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:;
    • https://www.studio1rpdance.com/dance-classes/ → default-src 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:;
    • https://www.studio1rpdance.com/class-schedule/ → default-src 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:;
    • https://www.studio1rpdance.com/class-attire/ → default-src 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:;
    • https://www.studio1rpdance.com/classes/classical-ballet/ → default-src 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:;
    • https://www.studio1rpdance.com/classes/jazz/ → default-src 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:;
    • https://www.studio1rpdance.com/classes/tap/ → default-src 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:;
    • https://www.studio1rpdance.com/classes/contemporary/ → default-src 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:;
    • https://www.studio1rpdance.com/classes/hip-hop/ → default-src 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:;
    • https://www.studio1rpdance.com/classes/lyrical/ → default-src 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:;
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • link.msgsndr.com (40 script tags)
11 checks passed, 2 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 110 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 110 HTML pages.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 110 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 110 HTML pages.

  • OKReferrer policy

    referrer-policy is set on all 110 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    The crawl set no cookies, so there are no cookie flags to check.

  • Not applicableForms over HTTPS

    No forms were found on the sampled pages.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.studio1rpdance.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.studio1rpdance.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.studio1rpdance.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.studio1rpdance.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.