Scanned sites / www.studio1rpdance.com

SEO report for www.studio1rpdance.com DR 1

The latest Site Spider scan of www.studio1rpdance.com, with 8 scans on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/www-studio1rpdance-com/2026-10-03-1848.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-10-03 18:48:04 UTC, finished 2026-10-03 19:44:50 UTC. Found on page 1 of brave web search results

Site: https://www.studio1rpdance.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

55/ 100Needs work

On October 3, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 99 pages and 200 assets of www.studio1rpdance.com, starting from https://www.studio1rpdance.com/. It scored 55 out of 100, a result that needs work. 7 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by broken links (86), non-200 responses (86), duplicate content (86); 11 checks passed. Most of the points went to broken links (−20), non-200 responses (−10), duplicate content (−8). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium1 medium, 1 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
99
Assets fetched
200
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
7 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

299 of 299 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 29 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags1 issue
    1 of 12 pages have title issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −0.8 points
  • Meta descriptions4 issues
    4 of 12 pages have meta description issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −2.5 points
  • HeadingsOK
    0 of 12 pages have heading issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
  • Broken links86 issues
    253 internal links point at 86 broken URLs.
    −20 points
  • Links to other sites45 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 6 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 29 destinations checked.
  • Redirects1 noted
    1 redirecting URL, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responses86 issues
    88 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 86 of them are pages, 86 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −10 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 12 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 1 page noindex by design.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 58 image references have no alt attribute. 33 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assetsOK
    0 assets larger than 500 KB among 200 fetched assets.
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage7 issues
    No sitemap found. Tried: https://www.studio1rpdance.com/sitemap.xml (301), https://www.studio1rpdance.com/sitemap_index.xml (503). Add one at /sitemap.xml or list it in robots.txt.
    −3.2 points
  • Internal link counts1 noted
    Internal link counts for 13 pages; 1 worth a look.
  • Thin content1 issue
    1 of 12 pages have fewer than 200 words. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −0.6 points
  • Duplicate content86 issues
    1 group of pages with identical HTML.
    −8 points
  • URL format14 noted
    14 of 99 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 13 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives13 noted
    13 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text32 noted
    32 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure2 noted
    2 of 12 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length6 noted
    6 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 13 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 16 response headers recorded across 299 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 13 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 55 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

What changed since the last scan

-2 points

www.studio1rpdance.com lost 2 points since the previous scan, moving from 57 to 55 out of 100. 349 findings changed. 490 URLs the earlier crawl reached were not reached this time. The crawl reached 204 fewer pages than last time, 99 in total, so some of the change is a change in what was crawled. Across 8 scans on record it is down 2 points overall.

  • Pages: 1 new, 53 gone, 34 not re-checked
  • Broken links: 55 new, 1 gone, 172 not re-checked
  • Page status codes: 2 new, 172 gone, 54 changed
  • Internal links to the page: 11 changed
  • 490 URLs from the earlier crawl were not reached this time
  1. 2026-09-10 06:32:34 UTC57/100329 pages
  2. 2026-09-12 07:51:42 UTC57/100329 pages
  3. 2026-09-12 15:16:55 UTC57/100267 pages
  4. 2026-09-12 15:21:53 UTC57/100267 pages
  5. 2026-09-14 01:57:23 UTC57/100319 pages
  6. 2026-10-03 07:12:52 UTC57/100329 pages
  7. 2026-10-03 11:27:59 UTC57/100303 pages
  8. 2026-10-03 18:48:04 UTC55/10099 pages

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2315 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.studio1rpdance.com scores 55%, higher than 3% of the 2315 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0571140%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 8 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 36 sites67%: 34 sites68%: 35 sites69%: 46 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 68 sites72%: 70 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 86 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 106 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 114 sites83%: 98 sites84%: 107 sites85%: 85 sites86%: 70 sites87%: 74 sites88%: 58 sites89%: 62 sites90%: 35 sites91%: 44 sites92%: 37 sites93%: 23 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 11 sites96%: 9 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 1 site100%: 70 sites55% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis (rules v4). The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

The site has several issues affecting its SEO performance, including numerous broken links and pages returning non-200 responses. Prioritize fixing these along with improving title tags, meta descriptions, and creating a sitemap to enhance site visibility.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: 253 internal links lead to broken (503) URLs, harming user experience and SEO.

    How: Identify the broken links and either restore the content or remove links if the destination is intentionally deleted.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: 88 URLs are not returning 2xx responses, affecting accessibility of your content.

    How: Check the URLs for errors and either fix them or remove references to unreachable content.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Create a Sitemap

    Why: No sitemap found reduces site crawlability and indexing potential by search engines.

    How: Generate a sitemap and list it in the robots.txt file or place it at /sitemap.xml.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

  4. 4

    Improve Title Tags

    Why: 1 page has a long title tag (>60 characters), which may be truncated in search results.

    How: Shorten the title to under 60 characters while keeping it descriptive.

    Checks: titles

  5. 5

    Enhance Meta Descriptions

    Why: 4 pages have issues with meta descriptions, potentially reducing click-through rates.

    How: Edit shorter or missing meta descriptions focusing on relevant keywords and keeping them under 160 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  6. 6

    Address Duplicate Content

    Why: Identical HTML across multiple pages may confuse search engines and affect rankings.

    How: Review and modify duplicate content to make each page unique, improving SEO relevance.

    Checks: duplicate-content

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website lacks essential security headers, which may expose it to potential vulnerabilities. Adding a Permissions Policy and tightening the Content Security Policy is crucial for safety. Moreover, ensuring third-party scripts include integrity checks can enhance security.

  • 0 high
  • 1 medium
  • 1 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Insecure Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: The CSP allows 'unsafe-inline' and 'unsafe-eval', weakening protection against script injection.

    Fix: Update the CSP to remove 'unsafe-inline' and 'unsafe-eval'. Example: Content-Security-Policy: default-src https: data:; script-src 'self'.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  2. 2

    Missing Subresource Integrity for Third-Party ScriptsLow

    Why it matters: Third-party scripts could be compromised, leading to unauthorized code execution.

    Fix: Implement Subresource Integrity (SRI) for all third-party scripts or restrict domains in a stronger CSP.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  3. 3

    Missing Permissions PolicyInfo

    Why it matters: No Permissions-Policy header restricts features like camera and geolocation that could be misused by injected scripts.

    Fix: Add the header: Permissions-Policy: geolocation=(), microphone=(), camera=().

    Evidence: Permissions policy

What the checks found

  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://www.studio1rpdance.com/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.studio1rpdance.com/about/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.studio1rpdance.com/dance-classes/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.studio1rpdance.com/class-schedule/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.studio1rpdance.com/class-attire/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.studio1rpdance.com/classes/classical-ballet/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.studio1rpdance.com/classes/jazz/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.studio1rpdance.com/classes/hip-hop/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.studio1rpdance.com/classes/dance-levels/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.studio1rpdance.com/contact/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.studio1rpdance.com/join/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.studio1rpdance.com/terms-and-conditions/ → no permissions-policy
  • NoteContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, but it allows inline or eval scripts ('unsafe-inline' / 'unsafe-eval'), which removes most of its protection against injected scripts.

    • https://www.studio1rpdance.com/ → default-src 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:;
    • https://www.studio1rpdance.com/about/ → default-src 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:;
    • https://www.studio1rpdance.com/dance-classes/ → default-src 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:;
    • https://www.studio1rpdance.com/class-schedule/ → default-src 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:;
    • https://www.studio1rpdance.com/class-attire/ → default-src 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:;
    • https://www.studio1rpdance.com/classes/classical-ballet/ → default-src 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:;
    • https://www.studio1rpdance.com/classes/jazz/ → default-src 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:;
    • https://www.studio1rpdance.com/classes/hip-hop/ → default-src 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:;
    • https://www.studio1rpdance.com/classes/dance-levels/ → default-src 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:;
    • https://www.studio1rpdance.com/contact/ → default-src 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:;
    • https://www.studio1rpdance.com/join/ → default-src 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:;
    • https://www.studio1rpdance.com/terms-and-conditions/ → default-src 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:;
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • link.msgsndr.com (13 script tags)
11 checks passed, 2 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 13 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 13 HTML pages.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 13 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 13 HTML pages.

  • OKReferrer policy

    referrer-policy is set on all 13 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    The crawl set no cookies, so there are no cookie flags to check.

  • Not applicableForms over HTTPS

    No forms were found on the sampled pages.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of www.studio1rpdance.com

Sites scoring near www.studio1rpdance.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.studio1rpdance.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.studio1rpdance.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.studio1rpdance.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.